PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate
attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't
be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats,
but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other
posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out
how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are
encouraged to read the
complete guidelines.
As entertainment critic Roger
Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue
with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
AyaK 10426 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
11-05-12, 08:21 PM (EST)
160. "RE: He's more open-minded today!"
LAST EDITED ON 11-05-12 AT 08:22 PM (EST)
I'm afraid that after four more years of Barack Obama's incompetence, there won't be a country.
Not because of the stupid belief in the 2016: Obama's America film that Obama hates America or wants to destroy American values, but just because Obama is so incompetent that he typically makes the biggest blunders possible.
Right now, it seems likely that Democrats will retain the majority in the Senate, though, thanks to Todd Akin and Richard Mourdock throwing away seemingly-certain GOP seats in Missouri and Indiana, respectively. (As cahaya pointed out, not only hasn't Richard Lugar endorsed Mourdock, but neither has Mitch Daniels, and his stupidity cost himself a fair share of their voters). With Bill Nelson preparing to convincingly pound Connie Mack in Florida, there are only four seats left that I see as toss-ups: Massachusetts, Virginia, Wisconsin and (despite the PPP poll) Ohio. Democrats will have 49 seats without winning any of these four (assuming Jon Tester loses in Montana), and they're likely to at least split these four (I give Kaine and Sherrod Brown slight edges), giving them at least 51. . .
. . . which means nothing is going to happen without a bipartisan majority supporting it. As a result, Paul Ryan won't get to run anything except the Senate, because he doesn't seem too good at building such majorities. Instead, Romney will get to see if he really can create Clinton-esque comromises on a national scale. I wish him luck.
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -