LAST EDITED ON 09-20-16 AT 06:53 PM (EST)

>The jury certainly thought she was
>the vilest one since they
>voted for him.

The Jury voted for the most proactive and best game player. It’s ludicrous to believe the jurors thought Danielle was more “vile” than Evil D!ck. LOL

>But that's simply another sign of
>his ignorance. Nicorey DIDN'T
>stay loyal to him so
>why would he even think
>of staying with them?

The FOUR weeks either Nicole or Corey was HOH, James (and Natalie) were never nominated. James said several times in the DR that Nicorey never targeted him or his partner so he had all the intention of staying loyal to them.

>But Paul and Victor worked in
>symbiosis: Paul had the
>strategy, Victor the challenge skills.
>
>
>Jordan was simply a parasite, a
>very, very cute parasite but
>still a parasite. She
>totally used Jeff's infatuation/love for
>her to her advantage.
>
>Nicole isn't a total parasite but
>she cetainly used Corey's infatuation/love
>to her advantage as a
>shield.

Jeff/Jordan’s love for each other went both ways. Nicole and Corey feel similar about each other also. Actually by my observation I would say Corey was carried a little more than Nicole throughout the season in that arrangement. Nicole was HOH twice; Corey was HOH twice. Nicole won POV twice; Corey won POV three times. At any rate it was NOT a case of a pathetically inappropriate sore-losing crybaby remark that some piece of trash would actually say to a female HG that she “F---ed her way to the end.”

>In the jury house, no, he
>didn't but in the BB
>house he definitely did.

There were times Paulie threw the gauntlet. But for the record that Paulie/Natalie confrontation blew up when Zakiyah came back to Paulie to say Natalie was filling her head with information that Paulie has no real feelings for her other than gameplay insinuating nothing will materialize outside the BB House. Paulie then flipped out. As I stated before, he handled and reacted to Natalie sticking her nose in their business extremely poorly, but Natalie initiated that confrontation by saying what she said to Zakiyah.

>But he didn't even try.
>An intelligent person would have
>found a way to make
>connections, use mnemonics, write things
>down...

My biggest point of contention with James this season is his lack of effort in the challenges. So your point is valid about not putting out optimum effort; but it wasn’t just for a memorization game, it was pretty much for everything all season. Even so, NO WAY any silly made-up crash course would have helped James in that challenge.

>In the jury vote a select
>few have ONE vote each
>and they usually put a
>lot of care into it
>even if it's based on
>their feelings.
>
>In the AFP vote, trolls and
>Fantards have unlimited access to
>the voting booth and they've
>probably made their mind in
>the first week or so
>because someone was funny, cute
>or given a bad hand
>to play. It's
>meaningless as far as a
>player's abilities to play the
>game. It rewards the
>entertainer more often than not.

A viewer voting multiple times for their favorite player does NOT apply to just ONE HG. It’s a process that occurs across the board for many more than just one HG. Some jurors put “a lot of care” into their votes...many, many do not. All too often the Bitter Bettys constitute a majority and end up voting AGAINST the player who strategically played the best game. It doesn’t get more “meaningless” than that. And if you’re going to counter that popularity IS a strategic way of playing the game, then it clearly adds more credence to the AFP vote.