>Although Danielle was not popular, I
>would not classify her as
>“vile.” Like I said, NO
>ONE in the history of
>BB was even a close
>second to Evil D!ck in
>that department. The jury certainly thought she was the vilest one since they voted for him.
>Spin all you want, James did
>not waver from his loyalty
>to Nicorey. Granted he had
>no way of knowing they
>would finish as strong as
>they did (hence some luck
>factor,) but I give him
>credit for sticking to his
>guns and thus able to
>reap the benefits.
But that's simply another sign of his ignorance. Nicorey DIDN'T stay loyal to him so why would he even think of staying with them?
>Working with your partner so you
>can both advance in the
>game is not “f---ing your
>way to the end.” Victor
>being a much bigger target
>helped Paul advance as well.
>Did Paul “f--- Victor to
>the end.” That’s the “relevant”
>point being made.
But Paul and Victor worked in symbiosis: Paul had the strategy, Victor the challenge skills.
Jordan was simply a parasite, a very, very cute parasite but still a parasite. She totally used Jeff's infatuation/love for her to her advantage.
Nicole isn't a total parasite but she cetainly used Corey's infatuation/love to her advantage as a shield.
>Just as I appropriately included others
>along with Paulie needing Anger
>Management, yes I agree others
>also would have benefitted from
>“grandpa’s” advice as well. Clearly
>Paulie handled and reacted to
>confrontations poorly, but he did
>not initiate all the confrontations
>either.
In the jury house, no, he didn't but in the BB house he definitely did.
>Not every human being’s aptitude for
>memorization and recall is the
>same. Some are flat our
>horrible. So all the prior
>preparation or knowledge of such
>a possible future comp would
>not have necessarily helped James.
But he didn't even try. An intelligent person would have found a way to make connections, use mnemonics, write things down...
>Whether it’s a Jury VOTE or
>an AFP VOTE, voting is
>a subjective process. Fantards and
>trolls are involved in BOTH
>processes.
In the jury vote a select few have ONE vote each and they usually put a lot of care into it even if it's based on their feelings.
In the AFP vote, trolls and Fantards have unlimited access to the voting booth and they've probably made their mind in the first week or so because someone was funny, cute or given a bad hand to play. It's meaningless as far as a player's abilities to play the game. It rewards the entertainer more often than not.