>What I don't sympathize with is
>people who want to stay
>pure so that they can
>have a track record for
>picking based on editing, trying
>to shape the rest of
>the forum.
If this is addressed to me (and it sure looks that way because there's practically no one else posting in the editing thread at the moment), I'll have you note that I never said anything about any other thread than the editing. Knowledge from Source Spoiler was being passed as analysis so I called it for what it was.
The rest of the forum, I enter or not at my own risk. In THIS thread, I simply mentioned that vidcap analysis should be...vidcap analysis but I didn't demand anything, just suggested.
BTW, I don't give a damn about track records, I do it for fun.
As for the effort of writing a warning, I think it's much worse to have a season wasted than to write a simple warning.
>Maybe we should look at Veruca's
>behavior as a model.
>Many moons ago, she announced
>that she was going to
>stay unspoiled, and because of
>that, she would NOT BE
>READING other topics. Not
>the interviews, the vidcaps, the
>blog, the voting, the clues,
>nada.
But that was her choice. Are you imposing it on others? Anyway, that's what I've had to do this season. (And when I announced I wouldn't be reading your posts, you jumped all over me!!!!)
Still, I should point out that this does't quite match with "to Each his Own"?
Georgianna had a great post that should be read again.