PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate
attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't
be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats,
but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other
posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out
how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are
encouraged to read the
complete guidelines.
As entertainment critic Roger
Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue
with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
I appreciate the opportunity to be able to share my opinion and be part of the consensus. I'm glad I shared here!
It really does appear that the Spoiler section has expanded in some way (isn't it natural for things to grow and evolve?) I was trying to get across (for lack of a less linear explanation) that on one side of the spectrum there is "spec" spoiling and on the other there is "source" spoiling. Some people, actually many of the more frequent well-versed posters on here, I believe like to cover the whole gamut of the spectrum. Kudos to them! Other's may like to chill on one side of the spectrum or the either. Neither right or wrong, just is.
Those who view it all may not see a need for identifying the two, or separating forums for the two, but it's respectful to be open to hearing that some may desire this. For to them, it may be a matter of simply enjoying the passtime of contributing to the forum without reading more info than they wish to know.
If any changes would be inconvenient for those who aren't already inconvienced, I get it. No need to rock the applecart. I've already felt inconvienced doing only "spec" spoiling, but I can remain so. I would imagine we are all savvy enough to monitor this on our own. I know I can continue to do so, as I have not yet been "source" spoiled this season.
But since it has been brought up, if there can be something done structurely, based on consensus, that would make this all easier, I'd say go for it.
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -