|
|
PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate
attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't
be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats,
but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other
posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out
how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are
encouraged to read the
complete guidelines.
As entertainment critic Roger
Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue
with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
|
|
"Jane"
pprat 1 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "American Cancer Society Spokesperson"
|
11-01-07, 01:54 AM (EST)
|
"Jane" |
NOt sure about anyone else...I am sick of hearing about Jane and how she can keep up with the 20 year olds....that is because she is filled with plastic...if she was a "TRUE" 55 year old the 20 year olds would dance circles around her.What is up with the goofy grin and cocked up eye....and ALWAYS has a comback to a negative remark from ther judges....go home rock those grandbabies to sleep...and plaster your mask on your face and go night night...she is such a BORE....and phoney.... next to hit the road....pulled a I am sick routine last night..she thought she got the boot....sore loser she is...
|
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
qwertypie 9721 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
11-01-07, 08:54 AM (EST)
|
1. "RE: Jane" |
Well, I am not hatin' Jane as much as you, but the first thing that entered my mind when they announced her illness was that she didn't want to face the red light.
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
 |
|
 |
qwertypie 9721 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
11-02-07, 01:54 AM (EST)
|
6. "RE: Jane" |
Yeah, once you had kids, they just aren't the same anymore are they?
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
 |
keezrfan 127 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Blistex Spokesperson"
|
11-03-07, 05:59 PM (EST)
|
12. "RE: Jane" |
Check out the new edition of People Magazine...there is a story about the work she's had done, and she's talking about all of it. She's had a bit!
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
MasterTech 57 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Hollywood Squares Square"
|
11-01-07, 02:02 PM (EST)
|
3. "RE: Jane" |
Lemme guess: you're still angry that Sabrina is off the show now, and you have to blame it on someone. Nice.
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
 |
qwertypie 9721 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
11-01-07, 09:05 PM (EST)
|
4. "RE: Jane" |
At least it is not yet another duplicate thread with Sabrina or Sabrina and Mark in the title
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
 |
Round Robin 2243 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Roller Coaster Inaugurator"
|
11-02-07, 02:55 AM (EST)
|
7. "RE: Jane" |
Maybe it's not, and that did get a little ridiculous this time, but at the same time the blue peeps IMO are sometimes a little too strict about the duplicate threads thing. There aren't that many threads here that the duplicates push any really good ones off the front page before they've run their course, so unless you have a week like this week when there are a lot of them, I think they should let most of them go.
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
 |
|
 |
mysticwolf 10692 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
11-02-07, 05:14 PM (EST)
|
9. "RE: Jane" |
LAST EDITED ON 11-02-07 AT 05:22 PM (EST)But then, you see, the Mods would open themselves up to determining, on a case by case basis, which, and how many, duplicates get to stay. Which would inevitably lead to posters deciding they get to question the Mod's decisions and argue along the lines of "Why can't mine stay open, too. You're sooooo unfair. You left more open in that forum. That's sooooo unfair." Which would lead to even more upset posters, because arguing with/criticizing a Mod's decision in public is also against the rules. Just as repeatedly starting duplicate threads can lead to a ban, so can this. The Mods volunteer their time to keep this a nice place to play. This isn't their job, and they're not full-time. And, they didn't create the rules. They enforce the rules that Webby, who pays for this place, set up. Believe me, it takes much less of the Mod's time, and makes this a much nicer, and "fairer", place the way it is. They wouldn't have to lock duplicates if posters bothered to read the rules when they sign up.  By the way, you probably shouldn't reply to my explanation. As you probably know, the Mods also prefer that threads stay on topic. In this case, Jane.
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
 |
qwertypie 9721 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
11-02-07, 06:26 PM (EST)
|
10. "RE: Jane" |
I am sure that Jane would follow the board's rules (even though she is not great about rules about lifts)
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
|
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
|
|