The Amazing Race   American Idol   The Apprentice   The Bachelor   The Bachelorette   Big Brother   The Biggest Loser
Dancing with the Stars   So You Think You Can Dance   Survivor   Top Model   The Voice   The X Factor       Reality TV World
   
Reality TV World Message Board Forums
PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats, but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are encouraged to read the complete guidelines. As entertainment critic Roger Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
"That's it"
Email this topic to a friend
Printer-friendly version of this topic
Bookmark this topic (Registered users only)
Previous Topic | Next Topic
Conferences The Apprentice General Discussion Forum (Protected)
Current Message

tinkerer 90 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Hollywood Squares Square"

03-27-06, 06:16 PM (EST)
Click to EMail tinkerer Click to send private message to tinkerer Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
42. "RE: Helpers vs Candidates"
I remember when Kwame and Bill were in the finals on the first Apprentice. When Omarosa sabatoged Kwame Donald Trump said Kwame should have fired her.

I did not see the first or second season. But did Omarossa do this sabotaging in the final task? Because if she did, then she was no longer a candidate, but simply a helper sent to aid one of the final two candidates.

I remember Tana saying in the Season Three finals that she would fire any helper who was messing up-both she and Kendra were laughing about the people the show sent to help them. They have since changed that policy, and now the final two candidates hire their own helpers from that season.

The status of a helper is not the same as a candidate. Just as the status of outside temporary help is not the same as an employee the boss hired.

For instance, suppose the owner of a company wants to move the operation into a new office. He sends several of his empolyees down to accomplish the move, and also hires several outside day laborers to help accomplish the move. Once in the office, the employee in charge of the move sees the day laborers are throwing things around, broke some things, and generally were messing up. So he steps up and sends the day laborers home, and decides to work several hours overtime to make up the slack. That is not a usurpation of the boss' authority.

Now, if the same employee was dissatisfied with the performance of one of his fellow coworkers, the ones the boss hired, he would NOT be in the position to fire them. He might reprimand them, he might change their tasks, but unless there was a prior understanding that he could fire people, that employee could not fire the coworker without being in trouble with the boss.

Same thing goes on the Apprentice. These candidates were selected by Trump's organization, and the other candidates have to work with them. That is part of the task. Moreover, the Project Manager is expected to meet a certain professional standard in dealing with any of the other candidates, just as an employee is expected to deal in a professional manner with any other employees the boss tells him to work with. If a Project Manager does not like a candidate he can give them a small, inconsequential job. But if he loses the task, the Poject Manager has to justify to Trump why he gave them that job and would not allow the candidate to help out more. And Trump better like the answer.

  Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Table of Contents
  Subject     Author     Message Date     ID  
 That's it   prosecutor     03-21-06       
   RE: That's it   newsomewayne     03-21-06     1  
     RE: That's it   Wacko Jacko     03-21-06     2  
   RE: That's it   LisaPles     03-21-06     3  
     RE: That's it   dafnaf     03-21-06     10  
     RE: That's it   RonReports     03-21-06     12  
         RE: That's it   seahorse     03-23-06     28  
   RE: That's it   singer     03-21-06     4  
     RE: That's it   LisaPles     03-21-06     5  
     RE: That's it   Wacko Jacko     03-22-06     14  
         RE: That's it   singer     03-23-06     25  
             RE: That's it   Wacko Jacko     03-23-06     26  
             RE: That's it   LIVEURBESTLIFE     03-25-06     30  
                 RE: That's it   Wacko Jacko     03-27-06     31  
   RE: That's it   jackandjill     03-21-06     6  
   Why was Brent even ON this show   mjpj2000     03-21-06     7  
     RE: Why was Brent even ON this show   Estee     03-21-06     8  
     RE: Why was Brent even ON this show   prosecutor     03-21-06     9  
   RE: That's it   tinkerer     03-21-06     11  
     RE: That's it   newsomewayne     03-22-06     15  
         Disagree without bashing, Wayne   Bebo     03-22-06     20  
     RE: That's it   saranita     03-22-06     18  
     RE: That's it   dafnaf     03-22-06     21  
   RE: That's it   ItsyBitsy     03-22-06     13  
   RE: That's it   nomadic_mouse     03-22-06     16  
     RE: That's it   LakerLuv     03-22-06     17  
         RE: That's it   big brutha     03-22-06     19  
             RE: That's it   LakerLuv     03-22-06     22  
                 RE: That's it   big brutha     03-23-06     23  
                     RE: That's it   LakerLuv     03-23-06     29  
             RE: That's it   tinkerer     03-23-06     24  
                 RE: That's it   Backster     03-23-06     27  
                     RE: That's it   Wacko Jacko     03-27-06     32  
                     RE: That's it   tinkerer     03-27-06     33  
                         RE: That's it   Backster     03-27-06     34  
                             RE: That's it   tinkerer     03-27-06     35  
                                 RE: That's it   Backster     03-27-06     36  
                                     Backster and Tinkerer, I'm enjoying...   singer     03-27-06     37  
                                     RE: That's it   LIVEURBESTLIFE     03-27-06     38  
                                         RE: That's it   Backster     03-27-06     39  
                                             Brent's firing   tinkerer     03-27-06     40  
                                             RE: Brent's firing   LIVEURBESTLIFE     03-27-06     41  
                                             RE: Helpers vs Candidates   tinkerer     03-27-06     42  

Lobby | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
about this site   •   advertise on this site  •   contact us  •   privacy policy   •