|
|
PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate
attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't
be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats,
but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other
posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out
how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are
encouraged to read the
complete guidelines.
As entertainment critic Roger
Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue
with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
|
|
"14 out of 16 votes for the winner???"
heymikey 238 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Network TV Show Guest Star"
|
12-22-01, 02:23 AM (EST)
|
"14 out of 16 votes for the winner???" |
I got this from www.survivorfever.netFourteen of the sixteen candidates voted off the "Survivor" TV show had to choose, wednesday december 19th 2001, between the two final candidates of the game, a man and a woman... ------------------ Does that mean that ALL of the people voted off gets to vote for the winner?
|
|
Top |
| |
SurvivorBlows 15230 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
12-24-01, 01:34 AM (EST)
|
1. "RE: 14 out of 16 votes for the winner???" |
LAST EDITED ON 12-24-01 AT 01:35 AM (EST)I doubt it. I think it's clear that based on this and some other "news" that althoguh the Tahiti Press is doing their best, they are getting some of the details wrong. (for example, I'd include their story about one tribe moving and the other not moving in that category, as well as some of their "counts" of the number of voted off folks at a given point in the game.)
|
|
Top |
| |
|
Ruthless 281 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Network TV Show Guest Star"
|
12-30-01, 04:30 PM (EST)
|
4. "RE: 14 out of 16 votes for the winner???" |
Never believe anything you read in the paper. Newspapers are notorious for not letting the truth get in the way of a good story.No doubt the local papers in Tahiti are being fed stories to keep them happy by CBS and they may not necessarily be totally trustworthy. CBS know there are people out there sucking up every bit of news on Survivor 4 they can find. More than a few red herrings are no doubt being spread by CBS. You can bet your bottom dollar that there is someone in CBS who is employed solely to read these forums and report on what direction the speculation is taking. Who knows, some of the posters may even be CBS employees who deliberately post exciting "spoilers" which are not even close to the truth.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
bondt007 3413 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Car Show Celebrity"
|
01-09-02, 05:38 PM (EST)
|
5. "RE: 14 out of 16 votes for the winner???" |
Just a thought, When S-4 starts, maybe we should track (via a thread) the Tahiti Press stories, and watch for any details reported as fact or fiction.
|
|
Top |
| |
Bebo 21083 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
12-26-01, 10:03 AM (EST)
|
2. "RE: 14 out of 16 votes for the winner???" |
14 voters could end in a tie. MB would never want something so anti-climactic to happen.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
Round Robin 2914 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Howard Stern Show Guest"
|
12-26-01, 02:38 PM (EST)
|
3. "RE: 14 out of 16 votes for the winner???" |
Obvious bullcrap. Survivorfever blew it bigtime on this one. They are as full of manure as a cattle barn.
|
|
Top |
| |
Mumbo Jumbo 270 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Network TV Show Guest Star"
|
01-13-02, 09:48 AM (EST)
|
6. "RE: 14 out of 16 votes for the winner???" |
Anyone voted off pre-merger from the "loser" tribe would essentially know next to nothing about the two finalists. All their knowledge would be from IC and RC interaction. It just wouldn't be fair.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
|
|