Squid: Thanks for posting this EW interview with Jiffy. I especially like what Jiffy said here...

Abi is the wild card. Will she drive people nuts enough to vote her out or can she annoy her way to the final three? It’s a great ending — two more eps!

With this in mind, I went back to see what Jiffy may have said toward the ending of Survivor: One World, and I found this post by Squid, located here, which btw, was also from an EW interview! Here is what it said:

EW: For viewers, the debate often seems to boil down to whether to root for the most deserving player — which at this point appears to be Kim — or to root for unpredictability and a tribal shake-up. As a producer, what’s more important: to have a great winner (like Tom in Palau or Boston Rob in Redemption Island) or to have lots of big shake-ups along the way (like in Survivor: Amazon)?
JP: Great question. Hard to answer that other than to say — you want the ending to be satisfying. Though Boston Rob dominated the entire game, for most people his win was satisfying. Had there been a crazy shake up at the end and the lovely young Natalie won, not sure it would have been satisfying. The perfect ending gives you great drama at TC but the person you want to win.

So, if Jiffy thinks that "it's a great ending" to the next episode, what could that possibly mean? So a great ending would perhaps mean that the most deserving player makes it through, OR, that there is a big shake up? One thing we know about the next episode is that from Jiffy's perspective, it will be satisfying, and perhaps it will lead to great drama at TC. Hmmmm?