>But lying about one another goes
>along with lying to one
>another, so where do you
>draw the line.

Easy: When the lie is addressed to production.

>Kind of an amazingly brilliant lie
>if it was an intentional
>lie, you have to put
>yourself in the lawyer huddle
>as they try to sort
>it out. "Well, if
>she's telling the truth and
>they had an agreement they
>both should be expelled, but
>if she's telling the truth
>and she didn't say yes
>to the agreement then there
>was no agreement so no
>rule was broken and they're
>both still playing the game,
>there's no right answer here,
>we're in trouble, you got
>any ideas?"

Only if they didn't have a crew covering Jane at all times which they always do.

>It's Sash's
>problem that his game was
>vulnerable to being scuttled that
>way,

Everyone could have been vulnerable to such a lie, even Tom.

>No wonder they decided to batten
>down the hatches and try
>to plug all the spoiling
>leaks, let's hope they also
>decided from now on to
>strictly enforce their own rules
>on the game.

You told me that they identified the source but you really think this trivial matter would be a bigger reason to stop a source than preventing boot lists from being revealed?????

Come to think of it, this could have been a great way to identify missyae's source. If you have it narrowed down to one or two possibilities, feed each a different lie similar to this and see which "news" gets revealed. Maybe this was how the dumbass was busted!