And wouldn't it be shocking (for SeeBS anyways) if Amber won 4-3, and the winning vote was from the very Bostonian she "betrayed!"

Heck, I could see Amber convincing Rawb that she wants to win (as a competitor), and feels that she cannot beat Rawb, but can beat Jenna, especially with his vote (and influence) on the jury.

I was originally going for a Jenna win all the way, but the recent spate of negative editting has me convinced (like Shakes) that she is F2 loser.

<begin Friday afternoon rant>
The only way Jenna's editting could not be geared towards a win is if she made one heck of a speech at the final TC. I always look for a player who was an a$$ to point out that they did it for specific reasons, to make people dislike them, to get themselves farther along. It would refreshing to see someone come out and say "Of course you hated me. That's what I was going for. I'm standing here in the final 2, so obviously you overlooked something. Sorry if I offended you with my dishonest play and constant betrayals, but that's what the game is about. You can take your integrity and console yourself with it, I'll take the million dollars instead." Of course, the only person I see pulling this for a speech would be Rawb. Which is why for some strange reason (well, actually due to my own decision that Romber and Jenna are a lock for the final 3 because of T/J/Rups collective game-wise stupidity) I'm cheering for Rawb.
<end Friday afternoon rant>

MEmacmur