The Amazing Race   American Idol   The Apprentice   The Bachelor   The Bachelorette   Big Brother   The Biggest Loser
Dancing with the Stars   So You Think You Can Dance   Survivor   Top Model   The Voice   The X Factor       Reality TV World
   
Reality TV World Message Board Forums
PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats, but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are encouraged to read the complete guidelines. As entertainment critic Roger Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
"pretty makes the rules"
Email this topic to a friend
Printer-friendly version of this topic
Bookmark this topic (Registered users only)
Archived thread - Read only 
Previous Topic | Next Topic 
Conferences The Apprentice General Discussion Forum (Protected)
Original message

gman 9 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "American Cancer Society Spokesperson"

01-31-04, 02:01 PM (EST)
Click to EMail gman Click to send private message to gman Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
"pretty makes the rules"
it seems the less attractive contestants are being eliminated;week two being the exception.also they have to be PC so that may save some for awhile.lets see how it plays out for the women.how come there are no over weight or unattrictive aspiring business women in america? what a country!!
  Top

  Table of Contents

  Subject     Author     Message Date     ID  
 RE: pretty makes the rules RealityRyan 01-31-04 1
   RE: pretty makes the rules gman 01-31-04 3
 RE: pretty makes the rules HyperTyper 01-31-04 2
   RE: pretty makes the rules PepeLePew13 01-31-04 5
 RE: pretty makes the rules Big Slick 01-31-04 4
   RE: pretty makes the rules gman 01-31-04 6
       RE: pretty makes the rules Big Slick 01-31-04 7

Lobby | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

Messages in this topic

RealityRyan 218 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Network TV Show Guest Star"

01-31-04, 02:58 PM (EST)
Click to EMail RealityRyan Click to send private message to RealityRyan Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
1. "RE: pretty makes the rules"
You have to remember, this is a TV show... Burnett and co. are all about the ratings and as the women have showed week after week, sex appeal sells to the masses.

Kathy must win !!! Down with THE RUPERT!
I heart America's Next Top Model

  Top

gman 9 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "American Cancer Society Spokesperson"

01-31-04, 05:29 PM (EST)
Click to EMail gman Click to send private message to gman Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
3. "RE: pretty makes the rules"
i agree with you,merit may have even less to do with this competition than i naively thought.
  Top

HyperTyper 63 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Hollywood Squares Square"

01-31-04, 05:22 PM (EST)
Click to EMail HyperTyper Click to send private message to HyperTyper Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
2. "RE: pretty makes the rules"
Because Burnett lives in a bubble - he wouldn't know a real situation if it bit his face off. These shows end up also being about how much the producers don't know.

Actually, DT makes the rules, and he's not pretty!

  Top

PepeLePew13 26135 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"

01-31-04, 08:17 PM (EST)
Click to EMail PepeLePew13 Click to send private message to PepeLePew13 Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
5. "RE: pretty makes the rules"
You can bet that if it were "The Donalda" (a female with a humungous ego that runs Mr. Universe), it'd be the other way around -- all of the guys would be eye candy and the females would range from attractive to average.



  Top

Big Slick 85 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Hollywood Squares Square"

01-31-04, 08:03 PM (EST)
Click to EMail Big%20Slick Click to send private message to Big%20Slick Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
4. "RE: pretty makes the rules"
LAST EDITED ON 01-31-04 AT 11:51 PM (EST)

>it seems the less attractive contestants
>are being eliminated;week two being
>the exception.also they have to
>be PC so that may
>save some for awhile.

I couldn't disagree with you any more. Clearly, the weakest of the men have been eliminated thus far. Forgive me if I can't remember names but the guy eliminated in week one was just a complete nerd, albeit freakishly smart...but a nerd, no people skills whatsoever. I wouldn't have had a problem if The Donald would have gotten rid of Sam in this one. The guy in week two had to be eliminated because he made a boneheaded decision. In the "Real World" he would have met with the client...no question. But here I think the clock got into his head, hence the "it's a waste of time" decision. In week three, Sam had outworn his welcome, this one was a no-brainer. If there is a bias here, I think week four would be your strongest arguement, but I ask you this:

Of the five remaining men, who would you keep if you could only retain four?

Bill? Yes, very good organizer and manager.

Troy? Yes, Not afraid to voice his ideas and think outside "the box".

Nick? Unsure.

Kwame? Unsure.

Bowie? Unsure.

So what separates these three? One, Kwame is the only one of the three (of the five for that matter) who has been PM.

I WAS WRONG: Troy was PM in week one.

Although he has failed (miserably I might add), he is the only one with the courage (if not confidence) to step up and give it a shot...so he stays, at least until someone else proves they can do a better job. So that leaves Nick and Bowie. Two, although Nick did quit (mentally if not physically) on the team, he did take a stand (I think artificially) for what he believed in during the "scam". When Bowie was approached with the question of whether or not he "went along" with it, he waffled and tried to straddle the fence...wrong move. You're either for it or against it, and you need to let it be known upfront. So Bowie's indecision is what ultimately cost him. Not the poor excuse of "lack of sales in merchandising" as Trump tried to use.

If the "unattractive" people have been excused early, I believe it is merely a coincidence and not a bias.

SLICK

  Top

gman 9 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "American Cancer Society Spokesperson"

01-31-04, 09:01 PM (EST)
Click to EMail gman Click to send private message to gman Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
6. "RE: pretty makes the rules"
SLICK,you make good points,however,remember the final decision in the boardroom is subjective.and,so far ,mostly,DT has eliminated the nerdy,the heavy,and the wierdo.they were interesting people,but far from being hunks.
lets see who will be the first women to go.my guess is that raccoon eyes will be one of the first.
  Top

Big Slick 85 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Hollywood Squares Square"

01-31-04, 09:54 PM (EST)
Click to EMail Big%20Slick Click to send private message to Big%20Slick Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
7. "RE: pretty makes the rules"
LAST EDITED ON 01-31-04 AT 10:00 PM (EST)

Who would you say that's "pretty" deserves to go before "raccoon eyes?"

The first one that comes to mind is Jessie.

Heidi and Tammy are the least attractive of the bunch, but Tammy came up with the phallic ad campaign so I'd keep her for sure.

Heidi needs an Extreme Makeunder.


SLICK

  Top


Remove

Lobby | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
about this site   •   advertise on this site  •   contact us  •   privacy policy   •