The Amazing Race   American Idol   The Apprentice   The Bachelor   The Bachelorette   Big Brother   The Biggest Loser
Dancing with the Stars   So You Think You Can Dance   Survivor   Top Model   The Voice   The X Factor       Reality TV World
   
Reality TV World Message Board Forums
PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats, but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are encouraged to read the complete guidelines. As entertainment critic Roger Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
"SCOTUS: Corporations may hold and ..."
Email this topic to a friend
Printer-friendly version of this topic
Bookmark this topic (Registered users only)
Previous Topic | Next Topic
Conferences Off-Topic Forum (Protected)
Current Message

Estee 57126 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"

07-01-14, 06:51 AM (EST)
Click to EMail Estee Click to send private message to Estee Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
14. "RE: SCOTUS: People may hold and ex..."
LAST EDITED ON 07-01-14 AT 06:53 AM (EST)

Nice to meet you, Speakup. Shall I now insult you by saying it's about time you did your own thinking instead of letting a group of bigots two to six thousand years dead do it for you? Or would you just take that as a compliment? How much of a fight would you like to have? Shall we both get ourselves banned here? Let's find out what the limits are before we go any farther, because you just crossed a line or two and I am more than capable of following. Personally, I'd ask you to explain the vasectomy/IUD divide, but I have no confidence that you'd answer it. Insult me for asking, yes. Answer, no.

In short form as I see it: you think you won. And you're right. Where I feel you're failing to see reality: you seem to think you're the only one who won. There are more faiths than just yours, and every one of them gets to try applying this. Legally, they now get to make that attempt.

You may feel you have the one true faith. So does everyone else.

So tell me why a Calvinist can't say 'My god's limited mercy does not apply to you' and express it as a canceled policy. That's the faith, Newsome: a recognized one with a good deal of seniority. Your death was predetermined by that deity. Can't argue with the decision of the deity. You never seem to, so why should they?

Also, about that 'illegal to inquire' question above. How does any prospective employee know what their coverage will be? How do you ask without breaking the law? What obligation does the corporation have to tell you?

Or just keep going with your current track and slap me in the face again.

That's part of the faith too, isn't it?

  Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Table of Contents
  Subject     Author     Message Date     ID  
 SCOTUS: Corporations may hold and ...   Estee     06-30-14       
   RE: SCOTUS: Corporations may hold ...   kingfish     06-30-14     1  
     RE: SCOTUS: Corporations may hold ...   Estee     06-30-14     2  
   SCOTUS: Persons who own Corporatio...   newsomewayne     06-30-14     3  
     RE: SCOTUS: Persons who own Corpor...   Estee     06-30-14     4  
         RE: SCOTUS: Persons who own Corpor...   newsomewayne     06-30-14     5  
             RE: SCOTUS: Persons who own Corpor...   Estee     06-30-14     6  
                 RE: SCOTUS: Persons who own Corpor...   newsomewayne     06-30-14     8  
                     RE: SCOTUS: Persons who own Corpor...   Estee     07-01-14     9  
   RE: SCOTUS: Corporations may hold ...   dabo     06-30-14     7  
     RE: SCOTUS: Corporations may hold ...   Estee     07-01-14     11  
         RE: SCOTUS: Corporations may hold ...   snidget     07-01-14     25  
   Well, that was quick.   Estee     07-01-14     10  
   Pascal Incorporated.   Estee     07-01-14     12  
     RE: Pascal Incorporated.   kingfish     07-01-14     18  
   RE: SCOTUS: People may hold and ex...   newsomewayne     07-01-14     13  
     RE: SCOTUS: People may hold and ex...   Estee     07-01-14     14  
         RE: SCOTUS: People may hold and ex...   dabo     07-01-14     15  
             RE: SCOTUS: People may hold and ex...   kingfish     07-01-14     16  
             RE: SCOTUS: People may hold and ex...   cahaya     07-01-14     17  
         RE: SCOTUS: People may hold and ex...   newsomewayne     07-01-14     28  
             RE: SCOTUS: People may hold and ex...   dabo     07-01-14     30  
                 RE: SCOTUS: People may hold and ex...   kingfish     07-02-14     32  
                     RE: SCOTUS: People may hold and ex...   cahaya     07-02-14     33  
                         RE: SCOTUS: People may hold and ex...   dabo     07-02-14     38  
                 RE: SCOTUS: People may hold and ex...   newsomewayne     07-05-14     45  
                     RE: SCOTUS: People may hold and ex...   cahaya     07-05-14     46  
                         RE: SCOTUS: People may hold and ex...   newsomewayne     07-05-14     47  
                         RE: SCOTUS: People may hold and ex...   starshine     07-05-14     48  
             RE: SCOTUS: People may hold and ex...   bondt007     07-02-14     34  
             RE: SCOTUS: People may hold and ex...   Estee     07-02-14     36  
   Hobby Hypocrites   dabo     07-01-14     19  
     RE: Hobby Hypocrites   kidflash212     07-01-14     22  
         RE: Hobby Hypocrites   dabo     07-01-14     24  
     RE: Hobby Hypocrites   newsomewayne     07-01-14     29  
         RE: Hobby Hypocrites   dabo     07-01-14     31  
         RE: Hobby Hypocrites   snidget     07-03-14     39  
   RE: SCOTUS: Corporations may hold ...   bondt007     07-01-14     20  
     RE: SCOTUS: Corporations may hold ...   Estee     07-01-14     21  
     RE: SCOTUS: Corporations may hold ...   kingfish     07-01-14     23  
         RE: SCOTUS: Corporations may hold ...   newsomewayne     07-01-14     27  
             RE: SCOTUS: Corporations may hold ...   Estee     07-02-14     37  
   Rick Santorum, future multi-million...   Estee     07-01-14     26  
   Here we go.   Estee     07-02-14     35  
     RE: Here we go.   snidget     07-03-14     40  
         RE: Here we go.   Estee     07-03-14     41  
             RE: Here we go.   kingfish     07-03-14     42  
                 RE: Here we go.   cahaya     07-04-14     43  
   First Hobby Lobby, now Wheaton Coll...   cahaya     07-04-14     44  
   By Christian definition, they're a ...   Estee     07-28-14     49  
     RE: By Christian definition, they'r...   cahaya     07-28-14     50  
     RE: By Christian definition, they'r...   dabo     07-31-14     51  

Lobby | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
about this site   •   advertise on this site  •   contact us  •   privacy policy   •