|
|
PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate
attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't
be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats,
but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other
posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out
how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are
encouraged to read the
complete guidelines.
As entertainment critic Roger
Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue
with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
|
|
"SeeBS EYEmail 11/11/02"
George Tirebiter 2982 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Howard Stern Show Guest"
|
11-11-02, 05:54 PM (EST)
|
"SeeBS EYEmail 11/11/02" |
Those bastids at SeeBS. . . they’ve skipped the profile AGAIN this week! They didn’t even bother with a recap of last week’s train wreck with breasts (or whatever those really are. . .)News from home draws sharp responses for one Survivor and may affect that person's future. A group of Survivors renew their vow to one another and concoct a plan to have one of their own infiltrate the other tribe. Meanwhile, other tribal allegiances fall by the wayside as one Survivor vows to "stir things up." Of perhaps more interest, I received an invitation to participate in the Survivor Fan Panel Survey, last week. The questions consisted of the usual: Who do you like? Do you watch every episode? Who do you watch with? Which is your favorite Survivor series? and Who do you think will win? Perhaps someone can derive some deeper meaning in the questions and manner they’re asked—sign up to join the panel and see them for yourself here. (Woo boy—you might win a BUFF. . .) Also, I have noticed that there have been ZERO Survivor: Still Standing newsletters; last season, they had cut them down to two, I believe. Can they really believe these well-picked bones have given us more to chew on than we deserve? PREVIOUS PROFILES: 9/17 Erin Collins 9/24 Jed Hildebrand 10/3 NO PROFILE! 10/7 Ted Rogers, Jr. 10/13 Stephanie Dill 10/22 Clay Jordan 10/28 NO PROFILE 11/5 Again, NO PROFILE PREVIOUS BOOTS: 9/19 John Raymond 9/26 Tanya Vance 10/3 Jed Hildebrand 10/10 Ghandia Johnson 10/17 Stephanie Dill 10/24 Robb Zbacnek 10/31 Shii Ann Huang 11/7 Erin Collins GT Breast size times I.Q. is constant.
|
|
Top |
| |
SurvivinDawg 6816 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
11-11-02, 06:12 PM (EST)
|
1. "RE: SeeBS EYEmail 11/11/02" |
Again, thanks for posting, GT.Seems they're getting a mite lazy over at Survivor HQ. As to the deeper meaning of the questions, I dunno. Looks like they're desperately trying to decide who hasn't turned to Friends yet, and target previews to the audiences.
"Breast size times I.Q. is constant." -- Except where OFG and GT are concerned, then it's exponential! Look out! WOO HOO!Contradictions don't exist. If you are faced with a contradiction, check your premises. You will find that one of them is wrong. -- Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged
|
|
Top |
| |
|
George Tirebiter 2982 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Howard Stern Show Guest"
|
11-11-02, 06:40 PM (EST)
|
2. "RE: SeeBS EYEmail 11/11/02" |
<As to the deeper meaning of the questions, I dunno. Looks like they're desperately trying to decide <who hasn't turned to Friends yet, and target previews to the audiences. Yepper. I neglected to include the most interesting question of all, and you reminded me--the one about "which would you like to see MORE of? Personal interactions? Challenges? Confessionals?" etc. That struck me as a sign they're desperate to give us whatever will keep us tuned in--although I believe they asked something similar, last season, and I don't think they made the most of it (or their respondents weren't the most astute bunch).Now, what they REALLY ought to do is ask for essay-type answers--or maybe someone should give them the link to REAL fan feedback, like the OFG and DK summaries of the actual episodes! THAT might drive home some important points, eh? GT
Hey, you--look up HERE when yer talkin' to me!
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
Kokoro 3899 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Thong Contest Judge"
|
11-12-02, 03:41 PM (EST)
|
4. "RE: SeeBS EYEmail 11/11/02" |
Well, that certainly sucks....anyone still think there may be some kind of jury pattern? ~Could~ this be a "surprise" Clay or Ted boot?Oh, and btw: <<Who do you like?>> Is "none of the above" an option? ----------------------------------- Now let us never speak of S3 again.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
|
|