Those bastids at SeeBS. . . they’ve skipped the profile AGAIN this week! They didn’t even bother with a recap of last week’s train wreck with breasts (or whatever those really are. . .)

News from home draws sharp responses for one Survivor and may affect that person's future. A group of Survivors renew their vow to one another and concoct a plan to have one of their own infiltrate the other tribe. Meanwhile, other tribal allegiances fall by the wayside as one Survivor vows to "stir things up."

Of perhaps more interest, I received an invitation to participate in the Survivor Fan Panel Survey, last week. The questions consisted of the usual: Who do you like? Do you watch every episode? Who do you watch with? Which is your favorite Survivor series? and Who do you think will win? Perhaps someone can derive some deeper meaning in the questions and manner they’re asked—sign up to join the panel and see them for yourself here. (Woo boy—you might win a BUFF. . .)

Also, I have noticed that there have been ZERO Survivor: Still Standing newsletters; last season, they had cut them down to two, I believe. Can they really believe these well-picked bones have given us more to chew on than we deserve?

PREVIOUS PROFILES:
9/17 Erin Collins
9/24 Jed Hildebrand
10/3 NO PROFILE!
10/7 Ted Rogers, Jr.
10/13 Stephanie Dill
10/22 Clay Jordan
10/28 NO PROFILE
11/5 Again, NO PROFILE

PREVIOUS BOOTS:
9/19 John Raymond
9/26 Tanya Vance
10/3 Jed Hildebrand
10/10 Ghandia Johnson
10/17 Stephanie Dill
10/24 Robb Zbacnek
10/31 Shii Ann Huang
11/7 Erin Collins

GT

Breast size times I.Q. is constant.

• RE: SeeBS EYEmail 11/11/02,SurvivinDawg, 06:12 PM, 11-11-02
  • RE: SeeBS EYEmail 11/11/02,George Tirebiter, 06:40 PM, 11-11-02
    • RE: SeeBS EYEmail 11/11/02,jkokoj, 10:35 AM, 11-12-02
• RE: SeeBS EYEmail 11/11/02,Kokoro, 03:41 PM, 11-12-02

Again, thanks for posting, GT.

Seems they're getting a mite lazy over at Survivor HQ.

As to the deeper meaning of the questions, I dunno. Looks like they're desperately trying to decide who hasn't turned to Friends yet, and target previews to the audiences.

"Breast size times I.Q. is constant." -- Except where OFG and GT are concerned, then it's exponential! Look out! WOO HOO!

Contradictions don't exist. If you are faced with a contradiction, check your premises. You will find that one of them is wrong. -- Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged

<As to the deeper meaning of the questions, I dunno. Looks like they're desperately trying to decide
<who hasn't turned to Friends yet, and target previews to the audiences.
Yepper. I neglected to include the most interesting question of all, and you reminded me--the one about "which would you like to see MORE of? Personal interactions? Challenges? Confessionals?" etc. That struck me as a sign they're desperate to give us whatever will keep us tuned in--although I believe they asked something similar, last season, and I don't think they made the most of it (or their respondents weren't the most astute bunch).

Now, what they REALLY ought to do is ask for essay-type answers--or maybe someone should give them the link to REAL fan feedback, like the OFG and DK summaries of the actual episodes! THAT might drive home some important points, eh?

GT

Hey, you--look up HERE when yer talkin' to me!