PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate
attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't
be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats,
but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other
posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out
how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are
encouraged to read the
complete guidelines.
As entertainment critic Roger
Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue
with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
>This? > >I knew there was nothing weak >or incompetant about Randal, nothing >what so ever. > >Has EVERYTHING to do with the >topic of this thread and >nothing to do with what >you supposedly just addressed. The >point is that you say >you knew there was nothing >weak about Randal...the question remains...how >do you know? > >Since you say you have no >connection to The Apprentice or >anyone on the show then >it is a fair statement >that you are basing this >on the editing. Strange...isn't it? >
I think she is basing her statement on Randal's education, experience, personality and the fact that he won every one of his 4 PM challenges, of which the first 3 no one disputes. Some things are debatable, some things are indisputable.
While I witnessed negative editing, positive editing and 'creative' editing, I do not think anyone feels that ALL the editing was biased toward one candidate or against another. And in my viewing based on these 3 types of editing, I came to the same conclusion as Singer: I knew there was nothing weak or incompetent about Randal, nothing what so ever.
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -