Oh Michel, what would my Reality TV enthusiasm be without you…

>Sorry but the game is won
>by the actions of the
>players starting on day 1.
> If you wait for
>the F2 then you will
>not convince anyone.

Not all the time. Andy (BB15 winner) was a virtual “ghost” (as confirmed by Zingbot) for the first two-third’s of the season before he kicked it in gear at the end.
Natalie (S29 winner) did very little noteworthy at the beginning of the season before earning her win at the end.
Same with Jun winner of BB4…and the list goes on.
Hayden specifically noted his competition wins to the Jury. Even the HOH he won on “Day One.”
Rachel did the same when addressing the Jury in BB13. OH, she also won HOH on “Day One.”
HMMM, maybe there IS something to your claim of winning the Jury over on “Day One.”

>I'm glad that you brought this
>up again because it enables
>me to show you this:
>
>
>

Bringing that up it enables ME to show you THIS

>According to many, many fans, Sandra
>is the greatest winner ever
>because she did it twice.
> And how may comps
>did she win?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

How bizarre you claim “many, many fans” regard Sandra as so great when the voting results proved many, many, MORE acknowledged Hantz better than Sandra in their season…an acknowledgement not shared by the bitter betty, sore-losing disgruntled Jury.
In any event, for every champion who did not win a comp, I can list a dozen or more who DID win competitions en route to their victories.
In the first half of a Survivor season tribe challenges are essential to avoid TCs and advance in the game. Whereas Sandra did not win individual challenges allowing her after the merge to get carried to the end by being appropriately regarded as a non-threat, to get to the merge the tribes she was fortunate to be part of performed very well in challenges.

>It was clearly shown in the
>live feeds that Austin AND
>Liz had made up their
>minds and that it would
>be Jmac vs Vanessa on
>the block.

Sakes Alive! Are you now going to replace your edit and conspiracy cards with “Live Feed” cards??? What exactly are these Live Feeds? Is this something you subscribe to so you can watch these Bozos 24/7? Or is it some written transcript posted by Production or fans?
If it’s the former than I must admit I am insanely jealous you would have enough disposable income to waste watching these idiots more than three hours a week.
If it’s the latter, then you REALLY don’t have a leg to stand on, because Production (as you stated numerous times) is “BS,” and fans/viewers will incorporate their own slant or bias in an written transcript…much like posters on these Boards.

>In the context of that whole
>paragraph, it is clear I
>meant that she laid the
>groundwork for their alliance IN
>CASE he returned.

Johnny winning his way back into the game had nothing to do with Vanessa’s “groundwork.” Vanessa is far from the only one. Pretty much every HG layed “groundwork” for a returning juror. We heard James repeatedly lay “groundwork” for a Jackie return. Liz/Julia were looking forward to a Shelli return who would most certainly have targeted James. It was just fortunate for Vanessa that Johnny was the one who won his way back in…reinforcing what Kingfish so accurately noted in his list citing Vanessa’s good fortune thus far.

>Lame response. It is the players
>duty to know how their
>words will be perceived.
>Saying "I have unfinished business"
>is a direct threat.
>That is an extremely dumb
>thing to do.

It’s even more lame to criticize a player for not having the foresight to mind-read another HG’s paranoia. And Austin’s reaction to Johnny’s statement was just that—paranoia. Furthermore, I believe Johnny’s intent was not to throw any gauntlet but to explain why he would not accept Vanessa’s deal and thwart any suspicion that they are working together. So far it appears mission accomplished. Well done, Johnny Mac!

>She certainly doesn't know that they
>had a formal 5 person
>alliance, that it even had
>a lame name.

As you stated yourself, prior to this week no alliance has been secret or safe this season. And the lame alliance formed to propose a Vanessa backdoor was no exception. Bottom line: Vanessa would have been told nothing she didn’t already know.

>James stole Liz's hat because it
>reminded him of his cat.
> If he is so
>homesick, you'd think he'd mention
>his 5 year old daughter.
> As for Chicken George,
>you had to go a
>long way back!!! Pretty
>sure his children were old
>enough to take care of
>themselves (if he had any
>that is. I barely
>remember him, let alone his
>family!)

So because Liz brought a cat hat into the House instead of a baby rattle or pacifier, let’s feed the accusation of a “deadbeat dad.” *snort*
I wouldn’t be the least bit surprised due to some Judge’s decision he sadly gets to see his cat a lot more than his own daughter. Of course I’m probably wasting my time here because I say this to someone who believes the Jury is ALWAYS right…so I would suspect you believe a Judge is always right as well.
The fact you’re not sure if George had any kids or family proves my point all the more. George appeared in Season 1 and All-Stars. Will (whose butt you blow enough sunshine up to melt the arctic ice shield) appeared in Season 2 and All-Stars. Pretty similar timeframes. And it was your boy Will who said this about George (and I quote) “He’s a bad ass player!”