Well yeah, that makes sense. If Monet gets a little more face time or a quasi-saboteur edit tonite, there will be a stronger case for her. As for Andrew, he has put a target on his back and that might be misdirection, but I just can’t get past his unhesitating willingness (per the edit) to volunteer to be the weenie without (supposedly) his knowing that it meant he would be immune for one week. I think it’s a good bet that either he had been let in on the secret or he was blindly following producer’s instructions, and that he is the saboteur. Don’t forget, he is the prime suspect (he was the nearest off couch hamster to the locked door when the lights came on) in the locked pantry door caper.

I think I caught a lie by Monet. In the background of one of the shots while detailing who was where during the blackout she says she (wild paraphrase) “You were next to me, she was there, and I was here all the time”. But according to the stills, she is lying about her own position, she clearly wasn’t there all the time. The fact that there two (or more?) blackouts might explain that, but it did seem as if she was trying to establish a false alibi for herself.

Wish-washy fellow that I am, I’m reversing my order. First guess is Andrew, second is Monet. After Tuesday’s show I may change it again.