>If he had used veto to
>take Zach off the block,
>Jess would have nominated Dani.
> But how would that
>have helped -- how would
>he have explained to Jess
>his vote to oust Amber
>under those circumstances, which in
>fact would have led to
>Amber's ousting by a 3-1
>vote (Eric, D!ck, Zach v.
>Jameka)?
>
>

Couldn't Eric have then saved Amber and kept Zach on the block? He mission was to get her nominated which he did - where was it written he couldn't then use the POV to save her? Doesn't America vote after the POV ceremony for who Eric should get out? Then America may have told Eric to oust Dani and Eric would have accomplished his 2 tasks - get Amber nominated and vote out Dani by a 3-1 vote (Amber, Jam, Eric vs. #####). Eric proclaimed he wanted ED/Dani gone but he could not do it because of America. I say he could have done it easily while still accomplishing his tasks. Am I missing something here?