>You don't have to win
>every challenges; but at least
>give 100%.

Fairly utopic I would say when many Pro athletes don't give 100% every night even when you pay to see them live.

>If everyone gives 100% you will
>still have the social element
>in the game which is
>important. It's just very
>disheartening to have a contestant
>give-up, cop-out, take the lazy
>way out and then be
>rewarded for it.

# of HOH won by Will = 0
# of HOH in which Will gave 100% effort = 0
# of POV Will won = 0
# of eviction decided by Will = all of them except when both nominees suited him.
Best player in the house = Will
I'd say Will proves that strategy is so much more important than winning competitions. He's made this season watchable.

>But the ones really to blame
>are...the other contestants who put
>out full effort but are
>idiotic enough to let these
>loafers get away with it.

What good is a full effort if once you've won a competition you make an idiotic decision? Anyway, keeping an inept player isn't necessarily a bad strategy. Will has kept Chicken George and Erika this far and despite 1 win each, they were probably the most inept players at the start (besides Howie but that is another matter). Those players are the disposable ones and why not keep them if you control them.