|
|
PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate
attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't
be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats,
but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other
posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out
how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are
encouraged to read the
complete guidelines.
As entertainment critic Roger
Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue
with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
|
|
"Should Peter have to win twice?"
intocable 30 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Beauty Pageant Celebrity Judge"
|
05-18-05, 03:55 PM (EST)
|
"Should Peter have to win twice?" |
MY question is this. Since Peter was already beat once, then should he have to beat who he is fighting twice? If not then he had the advantage of being in a double elimination tournament and no one else did. (other than Ahmed) So my thing is yes he is a good fighter but I think he should have to win twice, I mean this is a million bucs we are talking about!! I know it wouldn't happen, but does anyone agree with me?
|
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
Wacko Jacko 2434 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Seventeen Magazine Model"
|
05-18-05, 04:05 PM (EST)
|
1. "RE: Should Peter have to win twice?" |
The reason Peter is back is because the majority (almost all) the boxers still in the tourney voted him back in. Peter although losing once will have won the same amount of fights as the Sergio/Jesse winner. I have no problem with it. They had to bring somebody back and if they would've lost no one would've said anything. It was the only thing they could've done. Not sure that Gomez would've been in any condition to fight Peter again anyways.
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
 |
intocable 30 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Beauty Pageant Celebrity Judge"
|
05-18-05, 04:12 PM (EST)
|
2. "RE: Should Peter have to win twice?" |
Well I see what your saying, but I didn't mean that he beat Alfonso twice, I think he should have to beat the other finalist twice.. I know they all voted him back, but it still just seems unfair.. I think what they should have done was bring in a new person, I'm sure they had thousands of boxers trying to get in the show, so maybe they should have done that since it was still the first round. Just my thoughts..
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
 |
|
 |
|
stephs47 68 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Hollywood Squares Square"
|
05-19-05, 02:59 PM (EST)
|
5. "RE: Should Peter have to win twice?" |
I must ask, what is the deal with everyone bashing Peeta everywhere????? It seems like no matter where you go on the internet SOMEONE is bashing him. Let's look at it like this, if Ahmed had won after he was voted on to come back....would everyone still be saying this? Or is everyone jealous of Peeta for some reason? I'm not asking this question to be a smart-a@@, I really don't get it. The boxers voted for him to come back, it wasn't like he begged and pleaded with them to bring him back on the show (although I'm sure he wasn't complaining).I have written on here one other time under the Alfonso post. I am a 26 year-old female who can't get enough of the Contender. I really like Peeta but must say that Gomez showed so much class the other night that it left me speechless. But I really don't understand what everyone has against Peeta. Gomez did beat him once before but just like Gomez said the other night, Peeta won when it counted. And even though I'm a HUGE Manfredo fan, I must say that if those two fighters fight again...it would be a toss up. I could see either winning, depending on who was having the better night and who was connecting their punches (just like the first fight and then the second. Gomez got him the first, then Peeta came back to vindicate himself). Sure glad the people don't get to vote on the winner...Peeta would never win. Go Manfredo, you deserve it all the way!!!!!
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
stephs47 68 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Hollywood Squares Square"
|
05-19-05, 04:25 PM (EST)
|
8. "RE: Should Peter have to win twice?" |
I agree with you, they aren't going to give air time to the guy that loses. I talked with a guy, from Peeta's home state and a friend of Peeta's, he said he can't beleive the editing because the fights are not that close, not by a long shot. But when you think about it, it makes since for NBC to do what they did...who would rather watch a fight that is close rather than to watch some one get their butt kicked like it was no one's business? My point is yes, Peeta may have an advantage, but I don't think it's a good one. Like the last poster wrote, he has fought one more fight than everyone else. And granted they have had 6-8 months to get ready for this. Word is in Rhode Island that Peeta is in the best shape of his life. And if you think that Sergio can even come close...you MUST be mistaken....I think you need to make an appointment to get your eyes examened!!! Manfredo will beat him like he did Gomez, that's my prediction anyways....GO MANFREDO!!!
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
 |
|
 |
stephs47 68 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Hollywood Squares Square"
|
05-20-05, 08:59 AM (EST)
|
10. "RE: Should Peter have to win twice?" |
Ok, do you really think that the producers would've let that happen? That was one of (if not the biggest) fight of the series (the 2nd fight between Alfonso and Peeta)! peeta is not stupid either, he knew what he was doing. He knew that Alfonso could beat Ahmed, then he could fight him in the final four! If you go back and watch the fight between Ishe and Sergio it was a SPLIT decision. Also, if you watch the whole fight, you will notice that neither one clearly one each round (well maybe on round did go to Sergio), but other than that....it was even. The TV show only shows highlights, remember that! Peeta will destroy Sergio, I wish I was gonna be there to watch it live in Las Vegas so I got see it. Peeta will finally get what he deserves.....1 million dollars for his beautiful family!!! Go MANFREDO, all the way!!!!!
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
 |
eeler1 23 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Got Milk? Spokesperson"
|
05-20-05, 01:58 PM (EST)
|
11. "RE: Should Peter have to win twice?" |
As far as I can gather, these guys did the whole tournament in about a month. They had to fight at least three times or almost once a week. Thats hard to do, and could partly explain why the bouts were only five rounds. Manfredo had to fight four times. That extra fight was a huge disadvantage, making it tougher for him to advance, and balances out any critism for the double elimination. I mean a guy that can get beat up in the first one, then come back and fight three more times in three weeks, he deserves to be there. Can you imagine what Gomez face would have looked like if he had to fight one more time?In watching his fights with Gilbert and Espino, the edited versions, it looked like Manfredo was often just covering up so he wouldn't be too beat up for the next fight. He basically let Gilbert flail away at his forarms for two of the five rounds, ropadope comes to mind. I think the loss helped him figure out the format and then adjust to it better than some of the others did. He did just enough to win, but also saved himself so he wasn't too beat up in that last bout. Gomez's style (agressive but taking lots of punches) isn't well suited to this weekly fight format. Put a fresh Gomez in there in that last fight, or limit it to the 5 rounds, and the result might have been different. My $0.02.
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
|
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
|
|