|
|
PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate
attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't
be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats,
but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other
posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out
how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are
encouraged to read the
complete guidelines.
As entertainment critic Roger
Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue
with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
|
|
"What A B***h!"
TVJunkietoo 3 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "American Cancer Society Spokesperson"
|
03-06-05, 00:11 AM (EST)
|
"What A B***h!" |
Can't believe the final. The b***h winning is a bigger disgrace than than the w***e who came in 2nd on Big Brother awhile back. Mitch may have been an egomaniac but Kimberly is blah. I can't imagine anyone wanting to read her book or watch her on TV. She has no talent nor creativity. Can't believe I just wasted all that viewing time on this show. Definitely won't make that mistake again.
|
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
 |
flower 97 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Hollywood Squares Square"
|
03-06-05, 04:24 AM (EST)
|
2. "RE: What A B***h!" |
It takes a lot of hard work to be marketable!!! KK is just too lazy and unmotivated to pull anything off!! KK won't last, Mitch will prosper!!
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
 |
meme33 1 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "American Cancer Society Spokesperson"
|
03-06-05, 08:14 AM (EST)
|
3. "RE: What A B***h!" |
LAST EDITED ON 03-06-05 AT 08:25 AM (EST)LAST EDITED ON 03-06-05 AT 08:15 AM (EST) "Wickedly Perfect"? It should have been called, Wickedly disappointing... If there is a second season of Wickedly Perfect I hope that the makers will find judges who actually have some talent themselves. At any rate, I won't watch...It was a complete waste of time. The winner displayed no talent what so ever. I learned to make ribbon flowers in the third grade and that was the "winners'" strongest point. With a $20,000 budget for the party on the final episode, anyone could have pulled it off. I won't watch again. Mitch might have been a bit brazen, but he carried the show and clearly should have won. Any one of the other contestants would have been a better choice.
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
 |
|
 |
okaychatt 2810 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Howard Stern Show Guest"
|
03-06-05, 01:16 PM (EST)
|
6. "RE: What A B***h!" |
<Kimberly is no more talented than any number of women who teach craft classes at our local community center.Exactly. She copies ideas. She doesn't come up with her own. I will not watch her on the Early Show. I will not watch her own show. I will not buy her magazine. CBS had a chance to catch me as an early morning viewer. They blew it. I'll stick with CNN. Everyone is entitled to my opinion.
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
 |
|
 |
pandorella 82 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Hollywood Squares Square"
|
03-06-05, 09:49 PM (EST)
|
7. "RE: What A B***h!" |
What a joke!!! Kim was anything BUT warm. How did they miss her lack of talent? Because she had the right "look?" UGH!!! The object was to find the most diversified talent.What the heck were the judges thinking? Mitch should have won hands down. It is a shame that talent is over looked for being photogenic.How sad that the judges completely dropped the ball and awarded a person who came off as being arrogant and pompous. Unfair! The premise of the show was a farce! They weren't looking for wickedly perfect but perfectly wicked. I'm with you tvjunkie2...........
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
 |
collectsdolls 14 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Got Milk? Spokesperson"
|
03-06-05, 10:13 PM (EST)
|
8. "RE: What A B***h!" |
How quickly the judges for get the bottle orange juice in their drinks. It's a shame to think that marketing overruled talent.
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
 |
toddE 1433 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Beef Jerky Spokesperson"
|
03-07-05, 11:14 AM (EST)
|
14. "RE: What A B***h!" |
How did they miss her lack of talent? Because she had the right "look?" UGH!!!You hit the nail on the head. Kimberly won because she is the kind of woman the magazine, etc, is targeted to, so she gets the job. Unfair, yes. And lets look at the voting: The dumb blonde votes for the dumb blonde, the gay guy votes for the gay guy, leaving the cook to decide and he picked the "marketable" choice, i.e. young(ish) blond(ish) housewife. Terrible ending, but I still liked the show. The probably should just have eliminated whoever had the WORST individual project, but "voting out" is such a key part of reality TV.
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Pretty_Kitty 536 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Reality Show Commentator"
|
03-07-05, 08:45 AM (EST)
|
11. "RE: What A B***h!" |
I thought Mitch was practical while Kimberley lives in a world I do not identify with why would you put a fricken chateau on the front of the magazine cover ? It looks like every other pretentious magazine that has nothing whatsoever to do with the average persons lifestyle The front of Mitches magazine looked like something I would read I am verrry disapointed what a complete farce If Kimberly was so great then why diid she get a bad edit? Mitch was far and away the better person for the job the judges messed up BIG TIME
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
 |
ginger 22512 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
03-07-05, 11:47 AM (EST)
|
15. "RE: Scary!!!" |
LAST EDITED ON 03-07-05 AT 03:12 PM (EST)LAST EDITED ON 03-07-05 AT 12:29 PM (EST) Not much to add. I thought the ending sucked. If it was going to go to who looked nicest on TV, they could have saved us the time. Mitch kind of self-imploded, it's true, but Kimberly was just a gal who fit the suit. Ugh. ETA: Martha would NEVER have served food she hadn't tasted and approved first. On that point alone, Mitch should've won.
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
|
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
|
|