URL: http://community.realitytvworld.com/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/rtvw2/community/dcboard.cgi
Forum: DCForumID83
Thread Number: 36
[ Go back to previous page ]

Original Message
"What A B***h!"

Posted by TVJunkietoo on 03-06-05 at 00:11 AM
Can't believe the final. The b***h winning is a bigger disgrace than than the w***e who came in 2nd on Big Brother awhile back. Mitch may have been an egomaniac but Kimberly is blah. I can't imagine anyone wanting to read her book or watch her on TV. She has no talent nor creativity. Can't believe I just wasted all that viewing time on this show. Definitely won't make that mistake again.

Table of contents

Messages in this discussion
"RE: What A B***h!"
Posted by NDNation on 03-06-05 at 04:15 AM
LOL Kimberly won! Get over yourself. The judges finally saw Mitch for what he is. An idea guy...but THAT'S IT! Bobby said it the best. They needed someone who is marketable. Mitch isn't even likeable, let alone marketable.

Kimberly was the right choice.


"RE: What A B***h!"
Posted by flower on 03-06-05 at 04:24 AM
It takes a lot of hard work to be marketable!!! KK is just too lazy and unmotivated to pull anything off!! KK won't last, Mitch will prosper!!

"RE: What A B***h!"
Posted by meme33 on 03-06-05 at 08:14 AM
LAST EDITED ON 03-06-05 AT 08:25 AM (EST)

LAST EDITED ON 03-06-05 AT 08:15 AM (EST)

"Wickedly Perfect"? It should have been called, Wickedly disappointing...

If there is a second season of Wickedly Perfect I hope that the makers will find judges who actually have some talent themselves. At any rate, I won't watch...It was a complete waste of time.

The winner displayed no talent what so ever.
I learned to make ribbon flowers in the third grade and that was the "winners'" strongest point. With a $20,000 budget for the party on the final episode, anyone could have pulled it off.

I won't watch again.

Mitch might have been a bit brazen, but he carried the show and clearly should have won. Any one of the other contestants would have been a better choice.



"RE: What A B***h!"
Posted by Alisons on 03-06-05 at 09:26 AM
I totally agree. Why would anyone want advice from Kimberly? She can't even have decent food at a party with a 20K budget! She couldn't bake an apple pie, she used silk instead of fresh flowers, she spent tons of time working on doors and then just painted them, did a tacky project on the estate sale episode that turned out not to even be registered for her team!

Mitch at least had some real creativity. Kimberly is no more talented than any number of women who teach craft classes at our local community center.

It is a shame because the contests were interesting and there were some very talented people there - they just did not make it to the end. If someone like Mychael had won at least I would feel like I have something to learn from her from a cooking standpoint. With Kimberly I feel - well, I mainly feel relieved that Martha Stewart is out of jail.


"RE: What A B***h!"
Posted by okaychatt on 03-06-05 at 01:16 PM
<Kimberly is no more talented than any number of women who teach craft classes at our local community center.

Exactly. She copies ideas. She doesn't come up with her own.

I will not watch her on the Early Show. I will not watch her own show. I will not buy her magazine.

CBS had a chance to catch me as an early morning viewer. They blew it. I'll stick with CNN.


Everyone is entitled to my opinion.


"RE: What A B***h!"
Posted by TVJunkietoo on 03-06-05 at 11:00 AM
Mitch was just an idea guy??? Riiight! His ideas equaled his talent. He was diversified and could accomplish many tasks. What did KK ever accomplish? Mitch may have been egotistical but he also had the "right stuff". Let's see, have any other "egomaniacs" ever had a TV program or wrote a book.....

Once again, sex sells.


"RE: What A B***h!"
Posted by pandorella on 03-06-05 at 09:49 PM
What a joke!!! Kim was anything BUT warm. How did they miss her lack of talent? Because she had the right "look?" UGH!!!

The object was to find the most diversified talent.What the heck were the judges thinking? Mitch should have won hands down.

It is a shame that talent is over looked for being photogenic.How sad that the judges completely dropped the ball and awarded a person who came off as being arrogant and pompous.

Unfair! The premise of the show was a farce! They weren't looking for wickedly perfect but perfectly wicked.

I'm with you tvjunkie2...........


"RE: What A B***h!"
Posted by collectsdolls on 03-06-05 at 10:13 PM
How quickly the judges for get the bottle orange juice in their drinks. It's a shame to think that marketing overruled talent.

"RE: What A B***h!"
Posted by toddE on 03-07-05 at 11:14 AM
How did they miss her lack of talent? Because she had the right "look?" UGH!!!

You hit the nail on the head. Kimberly won because she is the kind of woman the magazine, etc, is targeted to, so she gets the job.

Unfair, yes. And lets look at the voting: The dumb blonde votes for the dumb blonde, the gay guy votes for the gay guy, leaving the cook to decide and he picked the "marketable" choice, i.e. young(ish) blond(ish) housewife.

Terrible ending, but I still liked the show. The probably should just have eliminated whoever had the WORST individual project, but "voting out" is such a key part of reality TV.



"RE: What A B***h!"
Posted by homeceo1 on 03-07-05 at 09:04 AM
I about DIED!! They finally did see him for what he was..A FAKE!
He had some talent and ideas..but he just wasn't real...I think his speech in the end "GOD gave ME a gift!" did him in...did you see the judges faces? How about his fake rant at the party..."This is the FUNNEST night of my LIFE!" LOL

Score one for the Homemakers...for once!


"RE: What A B***h!"
Posted by mookiemeister on 03-13-05 at 02:51 PM
I agree that Kimberly is the right choice over Mitch. Even though Mitch has more talent, he's a bit too arrogant to be attractive to his housewive audiences.


"As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain; and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality." - Einstein


"RE: What A B***h!"
Posted by nerovh on 03-06-05 at 10:28 PM
I just cannot get over those stupid ribbon flowers. They got Kimberly sent to the rock garden and off the show because the judges didn't like them. Then all of a sudden the judges just loved them?!! WTH? It makes no sense at all. All the judges said they were weak in earlier episodes, now Candace is raving about how she thinks even she could make them. Why would she want to make them? I thought she hated them. Geez, I can't believe how blatantly they just threw away talent and went for looks. And by the way, somebody needs to tell CBS that Kimberly ain't all that great looking. They should have just put in a model or actress as a plant, "I'm not a real domestic guru, I just play one on TV."


"RE: What A B***h!"
Posted by okaychatt on 03-06-05 at 11:55 PM
<Why would she want to make them? I thought she hated them

Just more evidence the judges were under the producers' thumbs.


Everyone is entitled to my opinion.


"RE: What A B***h!"
Posted by Pretty_Kitty on 03-07-05 at 08:45 AM
I thought Mitch was practical while Kimberley lives in a world I do not identify with why would you put a fricken chateau on the front of the magazine cover ? It looks like every other pretentious magazine that has nothing whatsoever to do with the average persons lifestyle The front of Mitches magazine looked like something I would read I am verrry disapointed what a complete farce If Kimberly was so great then why diid she get a bad edit? Mitch was far and away the better person for the job the judges messed up BIG TIME

"Scary!!!"
Posted by okaychatt on 03-07-05 at 09:32 AM
Have you seen her pic on the CBS site? Her eyes look like a special effect makeup job for a horror movie. ACK!

http://www.cbs.com/primetime/wickedly_perfect/#


Everyone is entitled to my opinion.


"RE: Scary!!!"
Posted by ginger on 03-07-05 at 11:47 AM
LAST EDITED ON 03-07-05 AT 03:12 PM (EST)

LAST EDITED ON 03-07-05 AT 12:29 PM (EST)

Not much to add. I thought the ending sucked. If it was going to go to who looked nicest on TV, they could have saved us the time. Mitch kind of self-imploded, it's true, but Kimberly was just a gal who fit the suit. Ugh.

ETA: Martha would NEVER have served food she hadn't tasted and approved first. On that point alone, Mitch should've won.




"Kimberly's "Target Audience"/style"
Posted by weltek on 03-07-05 at 12:55 PM
Kimberly says she wants to offer style without pretentiousness. Um, wasn't that a frickin castle on her magazine cover? Her whole cover screamed "pretentious" to me.


Handcrafted by RollDdice


"RE: Kimberly's "Target Audience"/style"
Posted by LilyMac on 03-07-05 at 03:42 PM
Castle on the cover... come on! This was crazy. And her title, "Lifestyle," YAWN. Aren't there already about 3 media outlets by that name?

No talent + competition who is smarter and more talented than the judges = WINNER. Sad.


"Lifestyles"
Posted by Pretty_Kitty on 03-08-05 at 01:21 PM
HELLO condoms can I say that here?

"RE: What A B***h!"
Posted by kidflash212 on 07-10-16 at 02:48 PM
Such language