The Amazing Race   American Idol   The Apprentice   The Bachelor   The Bachelorette   Big Brother   The Biggest Loser
Dancing with the Stars   So You Think You Can Dance   Survivor   Top Model   The Voice   The X Factor       Reality TV World
   
Reality TV World Message Board Forums
PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats, but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are encouraged to read the complete guidelines. As entertainment critic Roger Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
"Unfair challenge"
Email this topic to a friend
Printer-friendly version of this topic
Bookmark this topic (Registered users only)
 
Previous Topic | Next Topic 
Conferences Mad Mad House Forum (Protected)
Original message

nerovh 67 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Hollywood Squares Square"

04-30-04, 08:57 AM (EST)
Click to EMail nerovh Click to send private message to nerovh Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
"Unfair challenge"
I don't think Art's challenge was really fair to Nichole. I like Jamie, and I think she needed to win, but they were saying how she pulled a miracle winning that challenge. It wasn't a miracle, it was more of a set-up. Why was it fair that Nichole had to hold double the weight of what Jamie was holding? If she hadn't had double the weight, Nichole might have won that challenge, and Jamie and Eric would have gone up against each other for elimination. Jamie might not have won against Eric, and then Nichole might have beaten Eric in the finals. Heaven forbid Eric should have won the whole thing, I can't stand that smug idiot. Just imagine how Eric would have whined if he had had extra weight during a challenge. I'm not upset that Jamie won, she was one of the ones I liked, but it bothers me that it may not have been a fair win.
  Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

  Table of Contents

  Subject     Author     Message Date     ID  
 RE: Unfair challenge Deonna 04-30-04 1

Lobby | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

Messages in this topic

Deonna 2425 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Seventeen Magazine Model"

04-30-04, 09:28 AM (EST)
Click to EMail Deonna Click to send private message to Deonna Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
1. "RE: Unfair challenge"
I believe that if the weight had been put on Jamie instead of Nichole, Jamie would have caved immediately. Art going into the challenge, had to know that either Jamie or Eric would go out first based on previous challenges. He also had to have known that either one of them would have put the extra weight on Nichole. He (or the producers) intentionally setup the challenge that way. Why I donít know.

I was pleased that Jamie and Nichole were the final two. Jamie had a strong finish. I thought that she gave the perfect answer when asked why should Alts not pick Nichole to win. As the Alts stated at the dinner table, you donít build yourself up, by tearing someone else down. Nichole on the other hand, was strong throughout the show. In the challenges that she didnít win, at least she was a strong contender. I would have given the money to Nichole, base on her performance throughout the show. But I really donít know what was going on, that I didnít see. There had to some reason that almost all the TOPs disliked Nichole so much.

Deonna

  Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top


Lock | Archive | Remove

Lobby | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
about this site   •   advertise on this site  •   contact us  •   privacy policy   •