"What an outrage: Sara was eliminated." - Reality TV World Message Board Forums

Reality TV World Message Board Forums PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats, but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are encouraged to read the complete guidelines. As entertainment critic Roger Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."

"What an outrage: Sara was eliminated."

Conferences America's Next Top Model Forum (Protected)
Email this topic to a friend Printer-friendly version of this topic Bookmark this topic (Registered users only)		Previous Topic \| Next Topic
Original message

amazonophile 2 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "American Cancer Society Spokesperson"	05-10-06, 09:14 PM (EST)
"What an outrage: Sara was eliminated."
What an outrage Sara was eliminated. She is so beautiful. What were they thinking?
Alert	Edit \| Reply \| Reply With Quote \| Top

Table of Contents

Lobby | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

Messages in this topic

male_supa_model 6 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "American Cancer Society Spokesperson"
05-10-06, 10:49 PM (EST)

1. "RE: What an outrage: Sara was eliminated."

Yes Sara is pretty but a model a ANTM has to be able to look good, take good pics, be flawless in person, and be a spokes model. Sara was shy and ackward and not comfortable in her self/skin. I was taught when different people all say the same thing it's true. Alot of people said she wasn't comfortable in herself all these people didn't say it at once and they were seperate individuals at different times. So it has to make you think.

Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

nazpink 1058 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Politically Incorrect Guest"
05-10-06, 11:20 PM (EST)

2. "RE: What an outrage: Sara was eliminated."

Considering the level of the other girls Sarah deserved to go. If she wants to model then she is going to need to work on it back home to get herself to the level Danielle, Jade and Joanie got themselves to on the show. It would have been unfair and ridiculous to see one of those three walk over Sarah, who is awkward and not quite there. I agree with the judges decision and that's not always easy for me to say.
As for Jade being a skank well I don't think so. Where I live the definition of skank is a short way of calling someone a dirty ho and I don't see Jade as that. Yes, Jade is b!tchy, at times, and a bit arrogant but I think she is just one of those people who comes off the wrong way. I don't think she's a bad person. Even Nigel admitted to seeing a whole different side to Jade.

Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

puppyupper 13 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Got Milk? Spokesperson"
05-15-06, 01:27 PM (EST)

15. "RE: What an outrage: Sara was eliminated."

>Where I live the definition
>of skank is a short
>way of calling someone a
>dirty ho and I don't
>see Jade as that.
Where I live, a skank is any woman who looks like a dirty ho.
If it looks like a duck.....

Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Magnolia_Rocker 2139 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Roller Coaster Inaugurator"
05-15-06, 01:39 PM (EST)

16. "RE: What an outrage: Sara was eliminated."

"Where I live, a skank is any woman who looks like a dirty ho.
If it looks like a duck....."
*snort*

Siggy thanks to Syren!

Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Twinkles 324 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Cooking Show Host"
05-11-06, 05:46 AM (EST)

4. "RE: What an outrage: Sara was eliminated."

They were thinking... she doesn't know how to model?
Nigel had to tell her what to do step by step and she still couldn't get her face to change. She had the same problem with her walk at the go-sees. After they told her her walk was too stiff she couldn't correct it on the spot or at the subsequent ones. She needs longer term practice.
She is beautiful. They all are at this point. (especially on camera)
It's getting down to the wire *bites nails*

Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

MsDeeVeeAns 112 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Blistex Spokesperson"
05-11-06, 08:39 AM (EST)

5. "RE: What an outrage: Sara was eliminated."

Sara had no business being there and she knew it. Yes Sara is beautiful but she was not there out of personal aspirations or motivations.She is a step away from law...she will do well in that profession I am sure, she si very smart.
But in all fairness to the other girls who WANT to be the choice...Sara had to go.It is not Sara's fault as some would say as she was picked at the mall.There really are no losers as even Sara got to see parts of worlds she may never have seen otherwise.

Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

ettuT 77 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Hollywood Squares Square"
05-12-06, 11:31 PM (EST)

12. "RE: What an outrage: Sara was eliminated."

"Sara got to see parts of worlds she may never have seen otherwise." You think that? Sara was at a top tier law school, her boyfriend was an aid to a US Senator. She was chased down at a mall. She has a very unique face. Her body and size, her speaking abilities... She did not have repertoire of poses the other girls have but those are easily learned. I look at the final three and all I see are bad choices. Sara was never sweating it, she had the least to lose, she was in it this long because of her competitiveness, unlike the other girls, where this could be a life changing or bettering experience. I would not be surprise if an agency signs her.

Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

MsDeeVeeAns 112 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Blistex Spokesperson"
05-14-06, 10:08 PM (EST)

13. "RE: What an outrage: Sara was eliminated."

ettuT: you seem to be debating me then you are agreeing with me...I am confused...

Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

scota 6 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "American Cancer Society Spokesperson"
05-11-06, 03:46 AM (EST)

3. "RE: What an outrage: Sara was eliminated."

I was not sad to see Sara go, she was nice but I didn't think she was very pretty at all. She is too gawky and awkward. I wouldn't look at her pictures and want to be like her and IMHO I think that is part of being a top model.

Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

ANTMGirl4Life 57 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Hollywood Squares Square"
05-11-06, 01:43 PM (EST)

6. "RE: What an outrage: Sara was eliminated."

Yes Sara is pretty but she can't pose, walk, model to save her life. She definitely needs a lot of training and the show isn't long enough for that. She might be able to come back on a future cycle and win if she learns those things. She needs to 1st get comfortable with her height which is a major issue with her.
I was routing for her in the beginning but she didn't deliver so I was glad she left. The other girls are on another level.

Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

reealiteefan 103 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Blistex Spokesperson"
05-12-06, 12:13 PM (EST)

9. "RE: What an outrage: Sara was eliminated."

I always thought Sara was a bit of a zero. It could have been that unflattering haircut but her face never had any allure. Just goes to show it takes more than being taller than average to be a model. Scouts should have left Sara in the mall where they found her.

Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Das Mole 2364 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Seventeen Magazine Model"
05-11-06, 06:13 PM (EST)

7. "RE: What an outrage: Sara was eliminated."

She was pretty, but the way I see it, they made the right choice.
First of all, her pictures weren't really phenomenal or anything.
Secondly, I found her walk to be terrible.
And her desire to be there was questioned rather early on anyway.
The fact that she was as stiff as a piece of wood was probably the icing on top of the elimination cake for the judges.

Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

BRE_IS AWINNER 53 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Hollywood Squares Square"
05-11-06, 06:21 PM (EST)

8. "RE: What an outrage: Sara was eliminated."

whta were they thinking? this wasnt at all a surprise to me she never fit in and the judges hate dher and for the most part she didnt even want to be a model so if she would have won it wouldnt hav ebeen fear to the girls who wanted this so bad.

Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

RockGoddess420 15 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Got Milk? Spokesperson"
05-12-06, 05:35 PM (EST)

10. "RE: What an outrage: Sara was eliminated."

First off I'd like to say I think Sara is beautiful, and I can see a lot of potential there, but in all honesty I am suprised she lasted as long as she did. There are at least 2 or 3 that should have outlasted Sara imo. But the judges really WANTED her to "WOW" them and she never did. Her heart was never 100% committed to modeling, that to me, was totally obvious.

Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

capcomguy 38 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Beauty Pageant Celebrity Judge"
05-12-06, 08:46 PM (EST)

11. "RE: What an outrage: Sara was eliminated."

Neena, Furonda, and maybe Molly Sue.

Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

MsDeeVeeAns 112 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Blistex Spokesperson"
05-14-06, 10:11 PM (EST)

14. "RE: What an outrage: Sara was eliminated."

exactly RG.....

Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Lock | Archive | Remove

Lobby | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -

about this site • advertise on this site • contact us • privacy policy •