|
|
PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate
attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't
be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats,
but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other
posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out
how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are
encouraged to read the
complete guidelines.
As entertainment critic Roger
Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue
with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
|
|
"No hunks on the new show... What do ya think?"
cambo 286 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Network TV Show Guest Star"
|
05-13-05, 01:56 AM (EST)
|
1. "RE: No hunks on the new show... What do ya think?" |
In a twisted kinda way, I like when they bring in the hunks b/c it just shows you how hypocritical the person is. They sit in front of the camera and say how it's what inside that counts and how they've learned so much from the experience, but at the end of the day, it's hunk they end up choosing.
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
 |
ladro 1168 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Politically Incorrect Guest"
|
05-13-05, 09:53 PM (EST)
|
2. "RE: No hunks on the new show... What do ya think?" |
I agree. The not so hidden agenda of the show is set up the hot chick to expose how hypocritical she is. In the beginning there are quotes from her about how what is inside really matters, looks are not important to me, blah, blah, blah. Then in the end she makes her decision primarily on looks.
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
 |
|
 |
Nathan Griffin 73 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Hollywood Squares Square"
|
05-25-05, 03:19 PM (EST)
|
4. "RE: No hunks on the new show... What do ya think?" |
it is my belief that people should not be faulted for being human. it is true that this show has definitely shown a side of the world that we all see on a regular basis and yet are not necessarily confronted with in such a seductive manner once a week for six weeks.i don't believe it's hypocritical of someone to say that it's "what is on the inside that counts" and six weeks later choose the 'hunky' guy over the 'average' guy... you may at first think i'm insane being that i'm one of the 'average' guys that you will see on the upcoming season but i have support for my ridiculous claim. you have to consider the individual. there are people who truly do believe that it's what is on the inside that counts but even then, we are human. we have differing tastes. we have different goals. we appreciate different things (visually). the human body is like a work of art. some of us are more abstract and a select few lucky ones are comparable to Greek or Roman sculpture. the point is. there may exist someone who is wonderful in every aspect... and yet, if there no physical attraction, regardless of how much you don't want to believe it, i think a person would tend to 'keep looking.' this is not to say that the world is a horrible place. i have seen my fair share of gorgeous women with 'average guys.' obviously my first thought was "he must have money" but the reality is... they probably find each other attractive. so let these women decide what they will. if they are happy... let them be. if they are miserable, maybe we should suggest a small 're-evaluation' ;) i'm pretty sure there is someone for everyone out there. and i think (hope) we all end up with someone that we are attracted to both physically and otherwise.
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
 |
Nathan Griffin 73 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Hollywood Squares Square"
|
05-26-05, 10:36 PM (EST)
|
8. "RE: No hunks on the new show... What do ya think?" |
don't get me wrong, i too believe that the show wouldn't exist were it not for these very issues.
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
BlueLies 398 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Cooking Show Host"
|
06-29-05, 05:25 PM (EST)
|
13. "RE: No hunks on the new show... What do ya think?" |
"Did you watch the show last night? The previews showed hunks and they seemed even more obnoxious then the past hunks."Yes, I watched. I don't know why the so-called hunks have to behave that way. They should be able to handle themselves with a lot more class. "As for the girl choosing the hunks, the girl if you think about it is a female version of the hunks. It is natural that a female 'hunk' chose a male hunk. That is generally how people chose mates in the real world....hunks will be with 'hunks' and nerds will be with 'nerds'. The nerds are being just as hypocrital because they are nerds and they don't want nerds. That is the way it is. The show premise is flawed but it is still entertaining. " That would seem the natural order of things in most cases these days. They say you are initially attracted to your equal either physically or intellectually, and then you see how things go from there. Honestly, who wants a hunk that has nothing intelligent to say, and who wants a "Joe" that continually needs an ego boost/life coach instead of a girlfriend? If the "Joes" could find a lot more confidence and self-esteem, and the "Hunks" could find some self-restraint and dignity, then we might actually have a show with a lot more substance. The girl seems almost too conveniently 'unaware' if you ask me.
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
|
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
|
|