|
|
PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate
attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't
be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats,
but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other
posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out
how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are
encouraged to read the
complete guidelines.
As entertainment critic Roger
Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue
with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
|
|
"(SPOILERS) The Reason for That Thing in the Latest Preview"
ashleigh j 9 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "American Cancer Society Spokesperson"
|
10-07-03, 10:25 PM (EST)
|
"(SPOILERS) The Reason for That Thing in the Latest Preview" |
Okay, it said 200 characters before I post any possible spoilers, so I'll take a second to introduce myself.. Ashleigh is in fact my name, though I am in no way rich.. The other part of the phrase? Debatable. =P Okay, ummmm..Is it 200 yet? How about now? la la la la la... Okay, should be safe now. All the evicted housemates are coming back, as shown on the preview. But why?? To vote off the remaining cast members! Think about the math.. Let's say Matt votes for Ashleigh. The producers want to get rid of Brian. Brian and Ashleigh can't vote for themselves. So what happens? Hutch and Ashleigh both vote for Brian, and Brian can either vote for Hutch or Matt, since we don't need to explain a tie. And since Hutch or Matt would have immunity, that makes it even more difficult to rig the vote without it being obvious. And then once you're down to three housemates, both actors would have to vote for the Producer's Choice, but what if Matt votes for Ashleigh and they want Hutch gone? Let's say Matt has immunity, and Hutch can't vote for himself so he HAS to vote for Ashleigh, and Boom! Matt dictates the outcome. It's too hard to rig the voting at this point of the show, so the evictees shall take over that role. ;) Anyone have a better theory?
|
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
 |
ashleigh j 9 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "American Cancer Society Spokesperson"
|
10-07-03, 10:33 PM (EST)
|
2. "RE: (SPOILERS) The Reason for That Thing in the Latest Preview" |
True, but Matt might want to take Ashleigh to the Final Two instead of Brian, if he thinks he has a better chance to win the money against her. I don't think he would, but I doubt the producers would want to take that chance. He's already proven himself somewhat unpredictable, as shown with the hands on the hooker game.
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
 |
erikman 324 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Cooking Show Host"
|
10-07-03, 10:37 PM (EST)
|
3. "RE: (SPOILERS) The Reason for That Thing in the Latest Preview" |
so what she makes f3 no problem as long as hutch wins
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
 |
ashleigh j 9 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "American Cancer Society Spokesperson"
|
10-07-03, 10:43 PM (EST)
|
5. "RE: (SPOILERS) The Reason for That Thing in the Latest Preview" |
The "so what" is that the producers don't care who Matt votes for, they want to call the shots. And it's too hard for them to believably rig the outcome with only 4 people voting, one of whom is immune. Then it's even worse for them when there's 3 people voting and one of them immune.
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
 |
OceansAngel16 172 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Blistex Spokesperson"
|
10-07-03, 10:47 PM (EST)
|
6. "RE: (SPOILERS) The Reason for That Thing in the Latest Preview" |
That is probably why they have brought in the the people who were evicted from the house, because with four, its as you said, difficult to rig. But it could still be rigged with only 4 people, with 3 it would be even more difficult. But with 4, Hutch will probably have immunity, Matt will probably vote once again for Ashleigh, and then Brian has to vote for her, and they could get Hutch to vote for her too.
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
 |
OceansAngel16 172 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Blistex Spokesperson"
|
10-07-03, 10:43 PM (EST)
|
4. "RE: (SPOILERS) The Reason for That Thing in the Latest Preview" |
I don't think Matt would rather take Ashleigh to the final two instead of Brian, you could tell he was getting incredibly fed up with her and how she was acting, and how she would always talk bad about Molly. Though now that Molly is gone, she will probably tone down a little, though she will still probably carry on about things Matt wants nothing to do with. I believe he thinks he has a better chance with Brian in the final few, because with Ashleigh, she could always backstab him, and he knows Brian wouldn't do something like that
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
Danno 8 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "American Cancer Society Spokesperson"
|
10-07-03, 10:51 PM (EST)
|
7. "RE: (SPOILERS) The Reason for That Thing in the Latest Preview" |
Everything you said sounds right. It has to be that way to keep control over the outcome.Also, for the record (and I'm not being a wiseguy here) A THEORY you have, or something you think MIGHT happen, is NOT considered a "spoiler" A spoiler would be....well, a SPOILER! LOL Information that would spoil it for the rest of us that aren't privy to the info you have. If I say "I THINK Hutch will be kicked off next because..." That's NOT a spoiler If I say "Here's what's going to happen in the last episode. The secret will be revaealed to Matt, he gets REALLY angry at first, but is relieved when he finds out that he's not only the winner of the fake show, but he's in fact won FIVE hundred thousand dollars..." THAT would be a spoiler. Anything that I state as FACT. Like inside source type stuff. ;) I just wanted to save you time from having to use all that filler before making your post. -Danno
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
 |
ashleigh j 9 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "American Cancer Society Spokesperson"
|
10-07-03, 11:00 PM (EST)
|
8. "RE: (SPOILERS) The Reason for That Thing in the Latest Preview" |
I thought I was supposed to mark it because I was talking about the preview of the next episode that some people might not have seen yet? *shrugs* Better safe than sorry. *nods* Thanks for the clarification.
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
 |
|
 |
Danno 8 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "American Cancer Society Spokesperson"
|
10-08-03, 00:45 AM (EST)
|
11. "RE: (SPOILERS) The Reason for That Thing in the Latest Preview" |
The "one-post poster"???You're right, I couldn't POSSIBLY have ANY IDEA what I'm talking about because I've only made one post here, right? And of course I've probably NEVER posted to ANY other message board before in my life, right? A spoiler, the definition of a spoiler, and the etiquette regarding a spoilers, is NOT unique to JUST THIS message board. What I stated would apply to ANY message board. How to handle a spoiler may differ, but what is and isn't a spoiler wouldn't change. What she posted simply wouldn't be considered as such. What doesn't change from message board to message board are post-counters like yourself who look down on people who don't have a thousand posts, so they can't belong to your little "clique" My post to her was thoughtful, respectful, informative, and had a light-hearted tone to it. Her response to me was equally respectful and thankful. You just HAD to follow it up by putting me down because I "only have one post" Congrats! Your insult-post to me is yet another to add to your growing count and superiority of others. Thanks very much for the warm welcome. Danno
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
erikman 324 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Cooking Show Host"
|
10-08-03, 00:56 AM (EST)
|
13. "RE: (SPOILERS) The Reason for That Thing in the Latest Preview" |
well i looked at spike the 21 will be the GQ awards so it looks like this show is only 9ep's unless the 28's ep is 2 hours half live. so we get to f2 next week.
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
 |
erikman 324 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Cooking Show Host"
|
10-08-03, 04:36 AM (EST)
|
16. "RE: (SPOILERS) The Reason for That Thing in the Latest Preview" |
all the pre season pub said there will be 10 ep's how much does it cost to do a live show not much. and since they only paid him 10,000 so far they need to give him his check. this show has money look at all the sponcers it had and how much viacom put into it.
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
Rabies 79 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Hollywood Squares Square"
|
10-08-03, 10:58 AM (EST)
|
19. "You're right, but also..." |
Also, don't forget they are spoofing just about everything other Reality TV shows have done, and the idea of bringing back cast-out members to votes on remaining players has been done on the "real" shows. (Though as far as I know, it's usually only on the last episode??)
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
 |
|
 |
rtrui2t 9 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "American Cancer Society Spokesperson"
|
10-09-03, 06:04 AM (EST)
|
21. "RE: You're right, but also..." |
What I think would be the best way for then to reveal the truth to Matt is if the final 2 are Matt and Hutch, then they have the 'evicted' members vote, and have Hutch win with all the votes. Matt can't believe that they all voted for Hutch, they all string him on with lame excuses like, Hutch deserves it for making it so far with immunity, etc. Then just when Matt is about to blow, say, oh just kidding, this is all fake, everything was rigged, then see how long it takes for Matts head to explode!!!
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
|
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
|
|