|
|
PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate
attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't
be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats,
but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other
posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out
how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are
encouraged to read the
complete guidelines.
As entertainment critic Roger
Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue
with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
|
|
"Celebrity Mole to return"
evanakm 250 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Network TV Show Guest Star"
|
03-14-03, 07:18 PM (EST)
|
2. "RE: Celebrity Mole to return" |
Isn't this what killed shows like the Weakest Link? Yes, celebrities are fun to watch, but you stop caring after a while.
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
|
OKCRay 64 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Hollywood Squares Square"
|
03-14-03, 11:36 PM (EST)
|
4. "RE: Celebrity Mole to return" |
From what I've heard, due to the very real threat of international conflict, there have been concerns regarding production taking place overseas (not to mention the heightened risk of traveling abroad nowadays). Since part of the intrigue of The Mole is placing the contestants in foreign countries (especially the effect it has on the challenges), that may have contributed towards putting "The Mole" on hold in favor of having another celebrity edition. I'm just as disappointed as anyone else (as I'm chomping at the bit to audition for the next Mole installment!), but I was pleasantly surprised with the first Celebrity Mole and I'm glad both ABC and Stone-Stanley seem to be committed to keeping The Mole alive, in one form or another!
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
|
OKCRay 64 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Hollywood Squares Square"
|
03-18-03, 04:00 PM (EST)
|
10. "RE: Celebrity Mole to return" |
Chakachakachakachaka Khan... Chaka Khan, Chaka Khan... need I say more???!!! <G>
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
|
OKCRay 64 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Hollywood Squares Square"
|
03-27-03, 07:15 PM (EST)
|
13. "RE: Celebrity Mole to return" |
It would also be fun to see Courtney Love as a contestant; she wouldn't be boring, that's for sure!
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
mikey 1136 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Politically Incorrect Guest"
|
03-18-03, 04:32 PM (EST)
|
11. "RE: Celebrity Mole to return" |
I think they can go through a whole bunch of editions of celebrity mole before they run out of Baldwin brothers to appear. Or maybe Stephen could keep coming back in cameos -- he really didn't want to leave.
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
tvgeek401 1615 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Peanut Festival Grand Marshall"
|
07-01-03, 05:58 PM (EST)
|
15. "RE: Celebrity Mole to return" |
Hmmm... Well, at least its the mole in some form. I certainly liked regular mole better than "celebrity" mole, but at least i get to watch some kind. At least theres still hope for regular mole...and maybe then we can get Anderson back instead of that other guy...Amaad or whatever his name is. BTW...does anybody know when Celeb Mole will be on? smiles the tvgeek
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
CVLspaz 109 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Blistex Spokesperson"
|
07-13-03, 01:10 PM (EST)
|
16. "RE: Celebrity Mole to return" |
I had given up hope on any more mole. i haven't checked the boards for almost 6 months. i came and saw all this enthusiasm and talk of CM2 and it gave me hope for more regular mole!!!! thanks everyone for making my day
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
|
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
|
|