The Amazing Race   American Idol   The Apprentice   The Bachelor   The Bachelorette   Big Brother   The Biggest Loser
Dancing with the Stars   So You Think You Can Dance   Survivor   Top Model   The Voice   The X Factor       Reality TV World
   
Reality TV World Message Board Forums
PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats, but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are encouraged to read the complete guidelines. As entertainment critic Roger Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
"Strength in numbers? or Finding nothing in zero"
Email this topic to a friend
Printer-friendly version of this topic
Bookmark this topic (Registered users only)
Archived thread - Read only 
Previous Topic | Next Topic 
Conferences Survivor Spoilers Forum (Protected)
Original message

sgoogs 32 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Beauty Pageant Celebrity Judge"

02-20-01, 06:05 PM (EST)
Click to check IP address of the poster
"Strength in numbers? or Finding nothing in zero"
This may be nothing, but it does fit with my other theory,
see:
http://community.survivorblows.com/boards/DCForumID2/640.shtml


anyhow,,,,,looking again this week at the CBS web site Castaway photos
I found something very interesting.

*The first number is the # of "show" pictues before boot.
*The second number is the # of "show" pictues after boot.
*Third is the total # of "show" pictures

deb 1 + 1 = 1 (2nd photo is of the TC, thus this = -1)
kel 1 + 1 = 2 (not positive on pre boot # of "show" pictues)
mitchell 1 + 2 = 3
maddog 2 + 2 = 4 (not positive on pre boot # of "show" pictues)


Now for the remaining contestants,,

0 nick
1 rodger
1 liz
2 jeff
2 alicia
4 mike
4 kimmi


0 amber
2 tina
2 jerri
4 colby
4 keith


The already booted castaways have photos in an order,,,,
hmm,, in order 1 2 3 4 ,,, the next logical # in sequence?

`5

Assuming that the # of pictures we are looking for next is "5" then
0 or 1 is far too few as adding 4 or 5 pictures from one episode
is just editing overkill and could have been avoided in the first place.
these folks are Too Low to Go.

For the those with 4, simply adding 1 would not be enough considering
these folks have already already been "played up".
There final episode would require at least 2 more photos.
So they are Too High to Go.
With that said lets take a look at the remaining contestants # of "show" pictues ,

*first the name
*then number is the # of "show" pictues
*the 3nd item is the "indication" of the number
*the 4rd item is anything relevant to the individuals pics

nick 0 Safe too low
rodger 1 Safe too low
liz 1 Safe too low
jeff 2 (1 with alicia)
alicia 2 (1 w/ jeff)
mike 4 Safe too High (all solo)
kimmi 4 Safe too High (all solo)


amber 0 Safe too low
tina 2 (1 w/ maddog -- 1 w/ keith)
jerri 2 (1 w/ colby -- game show , same as Alica)
colby 4 Safe too High (1 w/ jerri)
keith 4 Safe too High (1 w/tina)

#################################
So we get

jeff 2 (1 with alicia)
alicia 2 (1 w/ jeff)

tina 2 (1 w/ maddog -- 1 w/ keith)
jerri 2 (1 w/ colby -- game show , same as Alica)

So if we beleive the "loses 3 in a row" theory then

Kucha Loses the IC

and Kucha Boots either/or

Jeff 2 (1 with alicia)
Alicia 2 (1 w/ jeff)

And further if we believe the "6-4 theory" then

Alicia is the one to go.


I may just be playing with numbers here...
but if we tie this to the air time results I bet we have something.


and one last thing (regarding the 6-4 theory)
the closer you get to "a secret" the more the rumors/truths are said to be false
that's only way to keep your secret............

  Top

  Table of Contents

  Subject     Author     Message Date     ID  
 RE: Strength in numbers? or Findi... Elwood 02-21-01 1
 RE: Strength in numbers? or Findi... MadforMadDog 02-21-01 2

Lobby | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

Messages in this topic

Elwood 93 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Hollywood Squares Square"

02-21-01, 08:30 AM (EST)
Click to check IP address of the poster
1. "RE: Strength in numbers? or Finding nothing in zero"
Heh..why is it every new theory, however logical or wacked out it is, seems to point (as far as I can tell) to either Alicia or Jerri being kicked (btw, the 2 I think are most likely this week).

I'm just looking for something to make me NOT decide Alicia goes.

  Top

MadforMadDog 48 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Beauty Pageant Celebrity Judge"

02-21-01, 04:24 PM (EST)
Click to check IP address of the poster
2. "RE: Strength in numbers? or Finding nothing in zero"
I have looked at the number of photos trying glean a clue. I ignored the ones who were booted but I know that the last two weeks the ones with the most or least photos were not booted. Very interesting analysis!! Good spoiler info I hope it gives us a clue.
  Top


Remove

Lobby | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
about this site   •   advertise on this site  •   contact us  •   privacy policy   •