|
|
PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate
attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't
be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats,
but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other
posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out
how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are
encouraged to read the
complete guidelines.
As entertainment critic Roger
Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue
with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
|
|
"Superbowl preview??"
cowboyroo 590 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Reality Show Commentator"
|
01-29-03, 03:12 PM (EST)
|
"Superbowl preview??" |
Does any one have vidcaps of the preview shown during the Superbowl. It had a lot of quick flashes of faces in the beginning which may have some clues....
|
|
Top |
| |
Krautboy 2750 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Howard Stern Show Guest"
|
01-29-03, 03:43 PM (EST)
|
1. "RE: Superbowl preview??" |
Coyboyroo: Not sure which preview it was, but here's a link to a series of vidcaps that includes the "faces" to which I think you're refering... http://www.survivorfever.net/vc-1-17.html Krautboy
|
|
Top |
| |
|
FSUGUY 447 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Daytime Soap Guest Star"
|
01-29-03, 04:18 PM (EST)
|
2. "RE: Superbowl preview??" |
wasn't the game on ABC? I didn't know we were allowed to watch any other channel.GO BUCS!
|
|
Top |
| |
|
Brownroach 15341 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
01-29-03, 04:36 PM (EST)
|
3. "RE: Superbowl preview??" |
>>wasn't the game on ABC?<<Yes it was, so obviously there were no S6 ads -- but I think this ad aired that same day.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
cowboyroo 590 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Reality Show Commentator"
|
01-29-03, 06:20 PM (EST)
|
7. "RE: Superbowl preview??" |
That's it...Thanks Bungler.... Looks like Daniel, Butch, Rob, Joanna??, Ryan, Jenna, Dave and Janet to me....
Being this is set in the Amazon, I can see MB wanting the women to do well for obvious reasons...Could these be the first 8 booted.... There's already been much speculation about Ryan, Daniel, Joanna, and Janet not lasting long....and there are 5 men, 3 women shown here, giving the women an advantage at the halfway mark.... Just an out there possible thought...
|
|
Top |
| |
SurvivorBlows 15230 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
01-29-03, 04:40 PM (EST)
|
4. "RE: Superbowl preview??" |
>Does any one have vidcaps of the preview shown during the >Superbowl. It had a lot of quick flashes of faces >in the beginning which may have some clues.... The Superbowl as on ABC, not CBS. CBS ran a new promo sometime last weekend with lots of "flashes" and no footage of the actual game, but if I remember right it was lots of wildlife flashes and a scene with Jiffy at the TC. Nothing other than a few forehead/eyes flashes of the castaways that was already in the other promos. There was also a new promo with Rob and Heidi, but it was worthless, just more trash talking, I missed recording the first few seconds of it and haven't bothered with vidcaps of the rest.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
FSUGUY 447 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Daytime Soap Guest Star"
|
01-29-03, 05:06 PM (EST)
|
5. "RE: Superbowl preview??" |
I'm thinking Krautboy has those in the 1/24 vidcap thread. He's combined a couple of promos. those are probably the fluff ones.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
cowboyroo 590 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Reality Show Commentator"
|
01-29-03, 06:15 PM (EST)
|
6. "RE: Superbowl preview??" |
DUH....The Superbowl was sooooo exciting I must have been channel surfing when I saw it.....I did think though with the long series of quick face shots, there may have been some clues there in terms of who was shown in the quick shots and who wasnt' or which order the cast was shown.... it was so quick, there was no way to determine who was who by the naked eye, so thought there may have been some clues there...
|
|
Top |
| |
|
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
|
|