|
|
|
|
PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate
attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't
be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats,
but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other
posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out
how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are
encouraged to read the
complete guidelines.
As entertainment critic Roger
Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue
with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
|
|
|
"Confirmation of Twist by CBS"
SurvivorBlows 15230 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
11-05-01, 03:45 PM (EST)
 |
|
1. "RE: Confirmation of Twist by CBS" |
I'd hesitate to call this "confirmation." To me it's nothing more than a repeat of the same rumor that they posted before. Until I see a link to the "CBS source," a NAME, or something else along those lines this still nothing more than a rumor. -SB
|
|
|
Top |
| |
MC_Hampster 105 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Blistex Spokesperson"
|
11-05-01, 03:54 PM (EST)
|
|
2. "RE: Confirmation of Twist by CBS" |
I also would like to point out that this "confirmation" of the rumor states that this would be happening at 9 players. The big "twist" is supposed to be next episode when there are 12. Obviously this "confirmation of twist" is neither a confirmation, nor a ... twist. Or something.-MC
|
|
|
Top |
| |
PepeLePew13 26135 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
11-05-01, 04:12 PM (EST)
|
|
3. "RE: Confirmation of Twist by CBS" |
futurizmo.com is also famous for taking rumours and turning it into 'stated facts.' In the month or so leading up the premiere of S3, there were quite a few 'facts' that came from futurizmo stating that, amongst other things, there would be a TC based in a tree and a bunch of other nonsense.I would take anything from futurizmo VERY lightly. 
"Damn you, Carl, for leaving me here with a bunch of misfits."
Frank Garrison, Nov. 1/01
|
|
|
Top |
| |
George Tirebiter 2982 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Howard Stern Show Guest"
|
11-05-01, 05:31 PM (EST)
|
|
4. "RE: Confirmation of Twist by CBS" |
Plus, the article is dated a MONTH ago. . . I'd like to see something more current--and maybe from multiple sources.GT
|
|
|
Top |
| |
 |
zzz 703 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Reality Show Commentator"
|
11-05-01, 05:48 PM (EST)
|
|
5. "RE: Confirmation of Twist by CBS" |
I don't think this is the strongest support because it is not the most reliable website and misidentifies the number of players left at the reallignment. But the fact that it was published a month ago actually adds credibility in my view. That means the article was printed before a bunch of "hoopla" started in which people were trying to figure out what the "twist" will be. It also explains why the reporter may have misunderstood the number and simply got confirmation that about midway they would break into 3 tribes. The reporter then assumed it would be even tribes of 3 rather than even tribes of 4 and misreported that fact. Basically, I find this to be mild support (not strong support) for the three tribe theory.
|
|
|
Top |
| |
|
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
|
|
Email this topic to a friend
Printer-friendly version of this topic
Bookmark this topic (Registered users only)
Will you be coming to China, Mark?
