The Amazing Race   American Idol   The Apprentice   The Bachelor   The Bachelorette   Big Brother   The Biggest Loser
Dancing with the Stars   So You Think You Can Dance   Survivor   Top Model   The Voice   The X Factor       Reality TV World
   
Reality TV World Message Board Forums
PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats, but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are encouraged to read the complete guidelines. As entertainment critic Roger Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
"Elizabeth, try harder."
Email this topic to a friend
Printer-friendly version of this topic
Bookmark this topic (Registered users only)
Archived thread - Read only 
Previous Topic | Next Topic 
Conferences The Apprentice General Discussion Forum (Protected)
Original message

Olympic 168 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Blistex Spokesperson"

10-29-04, 01:35 PM (EST)
Click to EMail Olympic Click to send private message to Olympic Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
"Elizabeth, try harder."
Elizabeth probably had the very best credentials coming into Apprentice, but somehow she just wasn't made to be in front of the camera. I got a hint early on that whenever the camera faces her that somehow she doesn't seem to be herself....Albeit, a nice women; I think the media/producer focus too much on her downside....Do they realize that they're ruining someones reputation?
  Top

  Table of Contents

  Subject     Author     Message Date     ID  
 RE: Elizabeth, try harder. Out4Blood 10-29-04 1
   RE: Elizabeth, try harder. Olympic 10-30-04 4
       RE: Elizabeth, try harder. Olympic 10-30-04 5
 RE: Elizabeth, try harder. Kelly_Smith 10-29-04 2
 It's rather daunting.... What 10-29-04 3
   Resume jae 10-30-04 6

Lobby | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

Messages in this topic

Out4Blood 52 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Hollywood Squares Square"

10-29-04, 01:52 PM (EST)
Click to EMail Out4Blood Click to send private message to Out4Blood Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
1. "RE: Elizabeth, try harder."
How does she have the best credentials? She worked at P&G and her firm does marketing surveys.

Pamela has by far a better resume. Penn and HBS. I-banking and consulting. She's started two very successful firms, Blazent (with offices in many cities) and CrimsonHoldings, she manages an investment fund, and is raising money for a second.

Kelly also has a better resume. As does Chris.

  Top

Olympic 168 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Blistex Spokesperson"

10-30-04, 00:41 AM (EST)
Click to EMail Olympic Click to send private message to Olympic Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
4. "RE: Elizabeth, try harder."
>How does she have the best
>credentials? She worked at P&G
>and her firm does marketing
>surveys.
>
>Pamela has by far a better
>resume. Penn and HBS. I-banking
>and consulting. She's started two
>very successful firms, Blazent (with
>offices in many cities) and
>CrimsonHoldings, she manages an investment
>fund, and is raising money
>for a second.


I did say the word "probably"....not "definitely" or "obviously".


Elizabeth excelled in Univ. with a 4.0 GPA and she does own and run Pulse40, Inc., ...etc....


I check out Pamela, but theres no access to 'about me'....but I'll take your word on her background.


Between them whose better? I can agree with you on a tie....


BUT by age comparison, I would have to say Elizabeth by far, because she's only 26 and has better credentials than Pamela when she was 26 awhile back.

  Top

Olympic 168 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Blistex Spokesperson"

10-30-04, 00:46 AM (EST)
Click to EMail Olympic Click to send private message to Olympic Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
5. "RE: Elizabeth, try harder."
>BUT by age comparison, I would
>have to say Elizabeth by
>far, because she's only 26
>and has better credentials than
>Pamela when she was 26
>awhile back.
>


delete that!

Elizabeth, 30 not age 26 today
Pamela, 32

  Top

Kelly_Smith 169 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Blistex Spokesperson"

10-29-04, 02:12 PM (EST)
Click to EMail Kelly_Smith Click to send private message to Kelly_Smith Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
2. "RE: Elizabeth, try harder."
I think Elizabeth is probably a very nice girl but as a leader she wasn't convincing at all. I thought maybe on her 2nd chance she'd do better but she repeated all the same mistakes and made some more. And she kept saying "I'm scared" in every sentence whenever discussing something. Something a leader should never say to his people!
  Top

What 209 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Network TV Show Guest Star"

10-29-04, 06:06 PM (EST)
Click to EMail What Click to send private message to What Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
3. "It's rather daunting...."
to be in front of the camera ALL the time. It's a task in and of itself. You have to be extremely focused and self assured. Experience helps..... and a good coach. She'll be fine.
  Top

jae 412 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Daytime Soap Guest Star"

10-30-04, 09:48 AM (EST)
Click to EMail jae Click to send private message to jae Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
6. "Resume"
I thought Jennifer Massey had the best resume, followed by Pamela and, trailing by quite a bit, Kevin and Elizabeth.
  Top


Remove

Lobby | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
about this site   •   advertise on this site  •   contact us  •   privacy policy   •