|
|
PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate
attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't
be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats,
but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other
posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out
how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are
encouraged to read the
complete guidelines.
As entertainment critic Roger
Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue
with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
|
|
"AyaK: Why did you lock my thread?"
ankerdosh 47 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Beauty Pageant Celebrity Judge"
|
04-22-04, 11:13 AM (EST)
|
"AyaK: Why did you lock my thread?" |
My thread -- "The Judges Should Blame Themselves" was not about bashing John Stevens. Not every thread is about bashing John Stevens. This thread was about the judges.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
ankerdosh 47 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Beauty Pageant Celebrity Judge"
|
04-22-04, 11:50 AM (EST)
|
4. "RE: Not the appropriate way to ask" |
Actually, I spent 10-15 minutes looking for a way to e mail Ayak before I posted that thread. It would be very nice if she had provided a link to that guideline. All I got a message saying "the ipos are locked."
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lisapooh 12664 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
04-22-04, 11:20 AM (EST)
|
3. "RE: AyaK: Why did you lock my thread?" |
not to speak for AyaK or anything, but there's still plenty of other threads your comments about the judges could have gone into. As a matter of fact, I posted the exact same thing (practically verbatim) about the judges needing to blame themselves last night. I just put it in an existing thread. We really like to keep the boards contained. We welcome and encourage new posters - we want to read your opinions, we don't want people to feel unwelcome or unwanted, but please folow the established guidelines of the community. You don't have to jump up and down and scream look at me to get attention or input on these boards.
|
|
Top |
| |
Ricky 1106 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Politically Incorrect Guest"
|
04-22-04, 12:00 PM (EST)
|
7. "I'm for creating even more threads..." |
Personally, I see nothing wrong with opening a new thread to discuss a specific topic, even if the topic is discussed somewhere else. The problem is that threads tend to go off topic and become 100+ entires long, making it difficult to follow all of the discussions. And then someone usually says someting like "oh that's being discussed in the "Spolier thread" and closes a perfectly legitmate new thread. It is difficult to come to this board and just read the topics you are interested in by the looking at the thread name since there are sidetracks and mini-discussions in also every one. I'm all for creating more threads. Just my two cents.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AyaK 10426 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
04-22-04, 02:56 PM (EST)
|
15. "Reply -- and relocking" |
I unlocked this thread to reply to ankerdosh. Here's why I locked your thread:If you had started a thread asking, "Do the judges really care who wins?" -- that wouldn't have been locked. It's a new topic. But to say that the judges should blame themselves because John Stevens is still around presupposes (1) that John Stevens shouldn't still be around and (2) that there is blame to be assessed because he is still around. I think there are plenty of other threads dealing with both of those issues. Don't you? If you want to discuss this further, please e-mail me.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
|
|