>I would be amazed if it
>went to trial.

I know..it's just wishful thinking to get an actual ruling on whether or not that's something that you can actually win a suit for.

>With some TV shows, an unknown
>outcome may be a big
>part of what drives the
>ratings. That's true of
>Survivor. There are probably
>going to be fewer people
>who watch if the boot
>list is out before it
>premieres, but OTOH the show
>has enough diehard fans that
>watch to see the spoilers
>materialize.

I know...I'm just not happy with Survivor suing someone who they don't apparently have a contract or NDA with for releasing info.

>So I would think that the
>person DBJ wants to sue
>is the person under contract,
>and not someone who posts
>spoilers. To get to
>the unknown person under contract,
>they sue the spoiler, which
>allows them to conduct discovery,
>which gives them access to
>emails and other communications that
>identify the leak.

But, if they were able to identify missyae, I wonder how they were able to do that without tracking how the info got there. I assumed that the Kimbo Slice thing was a bit thrown out to track down who the leak was...so, I'd think they knew who had that info, and could go from there.