>I have always thought that players
>who cried "Fix" were just
>sore losers, but after last
>night I'm re-thinking my position.
> Tyson's vote simply made
>no sense at all.
>There's no way to slice
>exlpain or understand why he
>voted Parvati.
>
>If Russell was telling the truth,
>then he didn't need to
>vote for Parvati - she
>would have been gone.
>If she had or played
>the immunity idol, then he
>couldn't have gotten her no
>matter what. If Russel
>had or played the idol
>then Parvati would have been
>gone on the re-vote.
>There was ZERO upside to
>switching his vote. NONE.
> It makes no sense.
> I saw no mullets
>at Tribal last night, so
>there was no one there
>stupid enough to throw an
>extra vote at what was
>either a sure thing or
>that had zero chance of
>happening.
>
>It's no secret that Jeff (and
>probably EPMB) love the chaos
>that Russell brings to the
>game. I have little
>problem believing that Tyson was
>pressured or paid to essentially
>vote himself out of the
>game. it makes more
>sense than any other explanation.

I could not disagree with the original poster.....anymore than I do.

Tysons vote made perfect sense....he did not want to be the "puppet"....can not think of the word given on Big Brother. He freaked out. He thought...no way Russell gives his immunity to Paverti and this elimates the need for a revote. Did Tyson know fo sure there'd be a revote? Maybe maybe not.

Also, Russell or Boston Rob? Who provided better ratings? I might argue Boston Rob did. So I see no reason why Survivor would fix things.

Myself, I almost don't feel like watching anymore without Boston Rob. I was rooting for Boston Rob....now who do I root for?