Amanda had a MUCH better FTC this time than in China. Really, the only votes she could have swayed were Eliza's and Cirie's, and Eliza didn't ask any questions, and Cirie just said in that interview that the answer probably didn't matter.
Amanda should have answered Cirie thus:
Cirie, Parvati DOESN'T deserve the million more than you. I don't even deserve the million more than you. You played the best strategical game out there. The only reason I am sitting here right now and not you is because I won that last IC and you didn't. The only reason Parvati is sitting here right now and not you is because I made an alliance with Parvati on Day 1. Between the two of you, I don't know that I could beat either of you in front of the jury, but I played a loyal game and so I had to bring Parvati with me or I couldn't sit here and say that I played a loyal game.

THAT would have been the perfect answer. However, as I already said above, Cirie herself said she was probably voting for Parv anyway. I am curious as to why. Personally, I have no clue what Cirie is saying about Amanda's answers not being honest. I don't know what answers she is talking about. Amanda said Parvati played a BOLDER game. That isn't true? Seems true enough to me. I think Cirie is just trying to make her vote look better, which is typical post-game revisionist history. But I am really curious as to why Cirie wouldn't vote for Amanda. I hope it is because she honestly feels Parv played the better game. I hope.

>