|
|
PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate
attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't
be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats,
but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other
posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out
how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are
encouraged to read the
complete guidelines.
As entertainment critic Roger
Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue
with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
|
|
"Sleek28's "boot list""
Brownroach 15341 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
01-26-04, 05:53 PM (EST)
|
"Sleek28's "boot list"" |
Okay, this should be taken with a huge bucketful of salt for now, but I'm posting it *just in case* we want to refer back to it later.A poster named Sleek28 put this up on Sucks as the definitive boot list, claiming to have inside information. The poster's m.o. aroused skepticism since he twice said he would come back to elaborate and then didn't. The posts were apparently deleted when he didn't return -- however, the list has been discussed extensively on Sucks (in the Chill One thread) as a more logical alternative to the C1's intel, especially in that the F7 switches Jenna and Tom (making for an all-Chapera F3), and switches Shii Ann and Alicia (getting Saboga pagonged consecutively). So, FWIW, Sleek28's order is: Tina Rudy Jenna M (leaves, not voted out-symbolic tribal council) Rob C Jerri Sue Ethan Richard Colby Lex Kathy Shi-Ann Alicia Jenna L Rupert Tom Amber and Rob M final 2 As I said, for now put this in category of "more stuff that's floating around out there" -- BUT, it may turn out to be worth another look as the game progresses...
|
|
Top |
| |
Subject |
Author |
Message Date |
ID |
yes, but... |
idiotcowboy |
01-26-04 |
1 |
RE: yes, but... |
Brownroach |
01-26-04 |
3 |
RE: yes, but... |
idiotcowboy |
01-26-04 |
4 |
Special Tribal Council |
Krautboy |
01-26-04 |
5 |
RE: Sleek28's "boot list" |
tribalwatcher |
01-26-04 |
2 |
RE: Sleek28's "boot list" |
munson |
01-26-04 |
6 |
RE: Sleek28's "boot list" |
Brownroach |
01-27-04 |
7 |
RE: Sleek28's "boot list" |
Blow by Blow |
01-27-04 |
8 |
RE: Sleek28's "boot list" |
Brownroach |
01-27-04 |
9 |
RE: Sleek28's "boot list" |
idiotcowboy |
01-27-04 |
10 |
RE: Sleek28's "boot list" |
udg |
01-27-04 |
11 |
RE: Sleek28's "boot list" |
Brownroach |
01-27-04 |
12 |
RE: Sleek28's "boot list" |
Scarlett O Hara |
01-31-04 |
61 |
RE: Sleek28's "boot list" |
dabo |
01-27-04 |
19 |
RE: Sleek28's "boot list" |
ihavturtlduvluv |
01-27-04 |
13 |
RE: Sleek28's "boot list" |
Brownroach |
01-27-04 |
14 |
RE: Sleek28's "boot list" |
ihavturtlduvluv |
01-27-04 |
15 |
RE: Sleek28's "boot list" |
Brownroach |
01-27-04 |
16 |
RE: Sleek28's "boot list" |
ihavturtlduvluv |
01-27-04 |
17 |
RE: Sleek28's "boot list" |
speedyforme |
01-27-04 |
18 |
RE: Sleek28's "boot list" |
dabo |
01-27-04 |
20 |
RE: Sleek28's "boot list" |
Milan23 |
01-27-04 |
21 |
RE: Sleek28's "boot list" |
dabo |
01-27-04 |
22 |
RE: Sleek28's "boot list" |
Brat2u |
02-05-04 |
70 |
RE: Sleek28's "boot list" |
dabo |
02-06-04 |
78 |
it's great fiction |
idiotcowboy |
01-27-04 |
23 |
WHAT PEOPLE WITH ACCESS WILL SPOIL ... |
forestforest |
02-11-04 |
138 |
RE: WHAT PEOPLE WITH ACCESS WILL SP... |
Get Bent |
02-11-04 |
139 |
RE: WHAT PEOPLE WITH ACCESS WILL SP... |
forestforest |
02-11-04 |
140 |
RE: WHAT PEOPLE WITH ACCESS WILL SP... |
Get Bent |
02-11-04 |
141 |
RE: WHAT PEOPLE WITH ACCESS WILL SP... |
okaloosajohn |
02-12-04 |
142 |
RE: WHAT PEOPLE WITH ACCESS WILL SP... |
forestforest |
02-12-04 |
143 |
RE: WHAT PEOPLE WITH ACCESS WILL SP... |
dabo |
02-12-04 |
147 |
RE: WHAT PEOPLE WITH ACCESS WILL SP... |
forestforest |
02-13-04 |
152 |
RE: Sleek28's "boot list" |
okaloosajohn |
01-28-04 |
29 |
Q? |
Krautboy |
01-28-04 |
30 |
RE: Q? |
okaloosajohn |
01-28-04 |
31 |
Episode 1 Post-Mortem |
Bebo |
02-02-04 |
62 |
RE: Episode 1 Post-Mortem |
munson |
02-02-04 |
63 |
RE: Episode 1 Post-Mortem |
kykate |
02-06-04 |
92 |
RE: Episode 1 Post-Mortem |
okaloosajohn |
02-06-04 |
94 |
RE: Sleek28's "boot list" |
LozengeofLove |
01-27-04 |
24 |
Switch Tribe Breakdown That Works |
Brad Lascelle |
01-28-04 |
25 |
RE: Switch Tribe Breakdown That Wor... |
LozengeofLove |
01-28-04 |
26 |
RE: Switch Tribe Breakdown That Wor... |
speedyforme |
01-28-04 |
27 |
Unclecameraman is back |
idiotcowboy |
01-28-04 |
28 |
RE: Unclecameraman is back |
Brownroach |
01-28-04 |
32 |
RE: Unclecameraman is back |
idiotcowboy |
01-28-04 |
33 |
Boot List Comparisons |
Krautboy |
01-28-04 |
34 |
RE: Boot List Comparisons |
idiotcowboy |
01-28-04 |
35 |
Please lock this thresd already! |
shakes the clown |
01-28-04 |
36 |
RE: Please lock this thresd already... |
lovetowatch |
01-28-04 |
38 |
shakes is right |
TeamJoisey |
01-28-04 |
41 |
RE: Boot List Comparisons |
Blow by Blow |
01-28-04 |
37 |
RE: Sleek28's "boot list" |
Brad Lascelle |
01-28-04 |
39 |
RE: Sleek28's "boot list" |
Krautboy |
01-28-04 |
40 |
RE: Sleek28's "boot list" |
pmspml5 |
01-29-04 |
42 |
Latest update |
Krautboy |
01-29-04 |
43 |
RE: Latest update |
Brownroach |
01-29-04 |
44 |
Sleek28's Stuff - A couple of thoug... |
crayZoZ |
01-29-04 |
45 |
Fuhgeddaboudit... |
Brownroach |
01-29-04 |
46 |
RE: Sleek28's Stuff - A couple of t... |
Krautboy |
01-29-04 |
47 |
RE: Sleek28's Stuff - A couple of t... |
Brownroach |
01-29-04 |
48 |
RE: Sleek28's Stuff - A couple of t... |
Krautboy |
01-29-04 |
49 |
RE: Sleek28's Stuff - A couple of t... |
Brownroach |
01-29-04 |
51 |
IS MARK BURNETT A FOOL? |
forestforest |
02-12-04 |
150 |
RE: IS MARK BURNETT A FOOL? |
dabo |
02-13-04 |
151 |
RE: Sleek28's Stuff - A couple of t... |
Griffe |
01-29-04 |
50 |
Three Options |
idiotcowboy |
01-29-04 |
52 |
Agree |
dabo |
01-29-04 |
53 |
RE: Three Options |
okaloosajohn |
01-29-04 |
56 |
RE: Sleek28's Stuff - A couple of t... |
crayZoZ |
01-29-04 |
54 |
RE: Sleek28's Stuff - A couple of t... |
dabo |
01-29-04 |
55 |
RE: Sleek28's "boot list" |
Brad Lascelle |
01-30-04 |
57 |
RE: Sleek28's "boot list" |
CaptainP |
01-30-04 |
58 |
The latest from sleek28 |
munson |
01-31-04 |
59 |
RE: The latest from sleek28 |
kelli_blue |
01-31-04 |
60 |
Tina's CBS Web Chat |
Get Bent |
02-02-04 |
64 |
RE: Tina's CBS Web Chat |
okaloosajohn |
02-02-04 |
65 |
RE: Tina's CBS Web Chat |
Blow by Blow |
02-02-04 |
66 |
RE: Tina's CBS Web Chat |
munson |
02-02-04 |
67 |
Janitor! |
JLude |
02-05-04 |
68 |
RE: Janitor! |
dabo |
02-05-04 |
69 |
can we please lock this NOW! |
shakes the clown |
02-05-04 |
71 |
RE: can we please lock this NOW! |
munson |
02-05-04 |
72 |
RE: can we please lock this NOW! |
okaloosajohn |
02-05-04 |
73 |
RE: can we please lock this NOW! |
Brad Lascelle |
02-05-04 |
74 |
RE: can we please lock this NOW! |
Brad Lascelle |
02-05-04 |
75 |
yet another reason why its BS |
shakes the clown |
02-06-04 |
89 |
RE: yet another reason why its BS |
GetMeOuttaHere |
02-06-04 |
99 |
RE: yet another reason why its BS |
Brownroach |
02-06-04 |
100 |
RE: yet another reason why its BS |
GetMeOuttaHere |
02-06-04 |
102 |
RE: yet another reason why its BS |
okaloosajohn |
02-07-04 |
113 |
RE: yet another reason why its BS |
tribephyl |
02-06-04 |
101 |
RE: yet another reason why its BS |
GetMeOuttaHere |
02-06-04 |
103 |
RE: yet another reason why its BS |
Brownroach |
02-06-04 |
104 |
I was not insulting Shakes. Do you ... |
GetMeOuttaHere |
02-06-04 |
105 |
RE: yet another reason why its BS |
theking0075 |
02-09-04 |
126 |
Unlocked for now |
AyaK |
02-05-04 |
76 |
RE: Unlocked for now |
dabo |
02-06-04 |
80 |
RE: can we please lock this NOW! |
SurvivorBlows |
02-06-04 |
79 |
RE: can we please lock this NOW! |
dabo |
02-06-04 |
81 |
Rudy WAS lied to |
mavsfan |
02-06-04 |
85 |
RE: Rudy WAS lied to |
allstarr |
02-06-04 |
91 |
RE: Rudy WAS lied to |
PepeLePew13 |
02-07-04 |
118 |
RE: can we please lock this NOW! |
MDSkinner |
02-06-04 |
86 |
RE: can we please lock this NOW! |
Raistlin212 |
02-06-04 |
87 |
RE: can we please lock this NOW! |
SurvivorBlows |
02-06-04 |
88 |
SLeek28's Stuff - No Clowning aroun... |
crayZoZ |
02-05-04 |
77 |
RE: SLeek28's Stuff - No Clowning a... |
Get Bent |
02-06-04 |
82 |
RE: SLeek28's Stuff - No Clowning a... |
Brad Lascelle |
02-06-04 |
83 |
RE: SLeek28's Stuff - No Clowning a... |
Get Bent |
02-06-04 |
84 |
RE: SLeek28's Stuff - No Clowning a... |
Brownroach |
02-06-04 |
93 |
RE: SLeek28's Stuff - No Clowning a... |
lovetowatch |
02-06-04 |
90 |
RE: SLeek28's Stuff - No Clowning a... |
GetMeOuttaHere |
02-06-04 |
106 |
sleek on E3 |
munson |
02-06-04 |
95 |
RE: sleek on E3 |
KObrien_fan |
02-06-04 |
96 |
RE: sleek on E3 |
MDSkinner |
02-06-04 |
97 |
RE: sleek on E3 |
VerucaSalt |
02-06-04 |
98 |
RE: sleek on E3 |
okaloosajohn |
02-07-04 |
114 |
RE: sleek on E3 |
MDSkinner |
02-08-04 |
125 |
RE: Sleek28's "boot list" |
Raistlin212 |
02-06-04 |
107 |
RE: Sleek28's "boot list" |
munson |
02-06-04 |
108 |
RE: Sleek28's "boot list" |
Raistlin212 |
02-06-04 |
109 |
RE: Sleek28's "boot list" |
Brad Lascelle |
02-07-04 |
117 |
RE: Sleek28's "boot list" |
Raistlin212 |
02-07-04 |
119 |
RE: Sleek28's "boot list" |
Brad Lascelle |
02-07-04 |
121 |
RE: Sleek28's "boot list" |
Raistlin212 |
02-07-04 |
122 |
RE: Sleek28's "boot list" |
dabo |
02-07-04 |
123 |
RE: Sleek28's "boot list" |
Brownroach |
02-09-04 |
127 |
RE: Sleek28's "boot list" |
volsfan |
02-06-04 |
110 |
RE: Sleek28's "boot list" |
Raistlin212 |
02-06-04 |
111 |
RE: Sleek28's "boot list" |
volsfan |
02-07-04 |
120 |
RE: Sleek28's "boot list" |
Cuauhtewatemoccajava |
02-06-04 |
112 |
RE: Sleek28's "boot list" |
okaloosajohn |
02-07-04 |
116 |
RE: Sleek28's "boot list" |
okaloosajohn |
02-07-04 |
115 |
RE: Sleek28's "boot list" |
fredscott |
02-08-04 |
124 |
Update |
munson |
02-09-04 |
128 |
RE: Update |
dabo |
02-10-04 |
129 |
RE: Update |
munson |
02-10-04 |
136 |
RE: Update |
strid333 |
02-10-04 |
130 |
RE: Update |
dabo |
02-10-04 |
132 |
RE: Update |
okaloosajohn |
02-10-04 |
133 |
RE: Update |
TeamJoisey |
02-10-04 |
131 |
RE: Update |
munson |
02-10-04 |
134 |
RE: Update |
dabo |
02-10-04 |
135 |
RE: Update |
munson |
02-10-04 |
137 |
RE: Update |
Naked |
02-19-04 |
184 |
RE: Update |
Brad Lascelle |
02-12-04 |
149 |
The latest and the last? |
munson |
02-12-04 |
144 |
Lame... |
Blow by Blow |
02-12-04 |
145 |
RE: Lame... |
Brownroach |
02-12-04 |
146 |
Sleek Poll |
dabo |
02-12-04 |
148 |
RE: Sleek Poll |
forestforest |
02-13-04 |
153 |
RE: Sleek Poll |
Get Bent |
02-13-04 |
154 |
RE: Sleek Poll |
pmspml5 |
02-13-04 |
155 |
Episode 3 Post-Mortem |
Brownroach |
02-13-04 |
156 |
RE: Episode 3 Post-Mortem |
okaloosajohn |
02-13-04 |
162 |
RE: Sleek Poll |
forestforest |
02-13-04 |
160 |
RE: Sleek Poll |
Get Bent |
02-13-04 |
163 |
Exactly! |
shakes the clown |
02-13-04 |
164 |
Crawling out of the woodwork |
munson |
02-13-04 |
157 |
New Silverstarz thread please? |
Krautboy |
02-13-04 |
158 |
Sure, KB |
munson |
02-13-04 |
161 |
RE: Crawling out of the woodwork |
buckeyegirl |
02-13-04 |
159 |
Last minute spoiling = lame |
Blow by Blow |
02-13-04 |
166 |
No more posts in this thread, pleas... |
Brownroach |
02-13-04 |
165 |
RE: Sleek28's "boot list" |
KeithFan |
02-16-04 |
167 |
RE: Sleek28's "boot list" |
dabo |
02-17-04 |
168 |
RE: Sleek28's "boot list" |
erickman |
02-18-04 |
169 |
RE: Sleek28's "boot list" |
okaloosajohn |
02-18-04 |
172 |
RE: Sleek28's "boot list" |
RealityRyan |
02-18-04 |
170 |
RE: Sleek28's "boot list" |
VerucaSalt |
02-18-04 |
171 |
RE: Sleek28's "boot list" |
okaloosajohn |
02-18-04 |
173 |
RE: Sleek28's "boot list" |
buckeyegirl |
02-18-04 |
174 |
RE: Sleek28's "boot list" |
Loree |
02-18-04 |
175 |
RE: Sleek28's "boot list" |
pmspml5 |
02-18-04 |
176 |
Looks like Sleek's run is over. |
I_Got_Nutn |
02-18-04 |
177 |
RE: Looks like Sleek's run is over. |
Brownroach |
02-18-04 |
178 |
Lock, Please. |
dabo |
02-18-04 |
179 |
RE: Lock, Please. |
westgirl98 |
02-19-04 |
180 |
As usual, I was right |
shakes the clown |
02-19-04 |
181 |
RE: As usual, I was right |
Blow by Blow |
02-19-04 |
182 |
RE: As usual, I was right |
ginger |
02-19-04 |
183 |
|
idiotcowboy 1135 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Politically Incorrect Guest"
|
01-26-04, 06:34 PM (EST)
|
1. "yes, but..." |
Ok it fits in nicely with the Patagonia stuff (which was early info), and the known Jenna M departure (though I thought she was leaving a little later like E4 OR E5). The Jerri and Sue boots look a little suspicious though I suppose tribal/alliance shuffling could make that work. Coupled that with the complete Mogo Mogo pagoning in the middle??? I dunno...Also, it doesnt map with the early snewser (wingedmonkeys) post that final 3 was 2 girls and guy (but then he messed up the binocular thingie and the tribal colors too). I guess if might work, but if I dont need any backing to support my claims I bet I could make one up that looks reasonable too! -ICB let see Tina 1st, Ethan 2nd... no make that Ru...
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
tribalwatcher 56 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Hollywood Squares Square"
|
01-26-04, 06:53 PM (EST)
|
2. "RE: Sleek28's "boot list"" |
I don't think it really matters, but the original post wasn't deleted, it was just moved to the dump at Sucks.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
Brownroach 15341 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
01-27-04, 11:09 AM (EST)
|
7. "RE: Sleek28's "boot list"" |
LAST EDITED ON 01-27-04 AT 11:11 AM (EST)hard to call this revised list "more" logical Hey, I didn't say it, it was the folks at Sucks. I agree, does "logical" happen anymore? But I think the idea is that C1's intel -- and Snewser's scorecard such as it is now -- have an F4 of Rupert and Jenna (both Sabogas) and Rob and Amber (both Chaperas), with Tom getting kicked out 5th. *Theoretically* that would engender a tie vote at F4. Wouldn't Rob/Amber/Tom vote out one of Jenna and Rupert at F5 to prevent that? By the same token, Alicia going before Shii Ann wouldn't make sense, as C1 has it -- if Shii Ann is immune, why not get rid of Rupert ? Whatever...
|
|
Top |
| |
|
Blow by Blow 895 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Fitness Correspondent"
|
01-27-04, 12:42 PM (EST)
|
8. "RE: Sleek28's "boot list"" |
It's entirely possible that Amber/Rob/Rupert/Jenna form a post-merge f4 pact. I believe three of those people could be trusted to stick with it (Rob might ditch). I can see Amber getting her act together and forcing Rob to stick with the deal if he proposed breaking it. Or, she could let him think they're breaking it, but stick to a vote against Tom. Doing so, she's shown loyalty to Rupert and Jenna, which will help her get to f3, and she can also tell Rob, "c'mon back to our twosome" and try to reach f2 with him. Sure, if Tom does get booted the crew goes into f4 with a 2vs2 split, but they might openly acknowledge this conundrum and agree that MB can unveil whatever lame tie breaker he wants and they'll take their chances. After all, at that point you'd have a 25% chance of winning the mil, so why not take the gamble? Does that make sense? -BbB
|
|
Top |
| |
|
Brownroach 15341 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
01-27-04, 01:31 PM (EST)
|
9. "RE: Sleek28's "boot list"" |
LAST EDITED ON 01-27-04 AT 01:32 PM (EST)Well, I'd rather know for sure that I'll have a 33.33% chance of winning the mil. Frankly, I've been wondering about Rupert -- how would he manage to get that far this time? He'd have to be more tuned in to alliances. Also, he may try to downplay his challenge-hogness. These JP comments were posted on Sucks this morning: WishICouldTell Registered User Posts: 146 (1/27/04 6:43 am) Reply JP -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I heard JP on Bob & Tom. He said, among other things, that he was very curious to see if the contestants who had "played a high note", such as Richard, Rob C., and Rupert would change their strategy in ASS, because if they didn't, they were toast. He said Rupert did just that. Rupert came in as a "mule", as in, "Load me up with work, I am the strong one", and Rupert just worked and stayed out of the limelight, which was a "great strategy". --------------------------------------------------- It does appear that Saboga loses the first IC -- maybe Rupert doesn't give it quite everything he's got? The rest is also interesting (from the same post): Also, Rupert was the only player in which no one knew much about, as they only saw the first 5 episodes of PI. So, they TOLD THEM that Rupert did not win PI, out of fairness, so that Rupert wouldn't get voted out on a "maybe he won" theory. JP said that Jon would have definitely been cast if they had known that he would become such a villain. But at the time of casting, they hadn't seen that develop yet. Also, the theme is "familiarity", thus a repeat location, and we will see popular challenges revisited. ------------------------------------------------------- It sounds like they knew the winners would be targeted early. I'd have expected Rupert to make sure everyone knew he didn't win, but it didn't occur to me that MB/JP would tell them. I don't understand the comment about Jon. They'd have known what a weasel Jon was by the time S7 was over.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
|
udg 3381 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Car Show Celebrity"
|
01-27-04, 02:01 PM (EST)
|
11. "RE: Sleek28's "boot list"" |
LAST EDITED ON 01-27-04 AT 02:03 PM (EST) >JP said that Jon would have >definitely been cast if they >had known that he would >become such a villain. But >at the time of casting, >they hadn't seen that develop >yet.
>I don't understand the comment about >Jon. They'd have known >what a weasel Jon was >by the time S7 was >over. I don't think JP & MB realized how bad people would think Jon was. I don't think they saw it as truly evil or "crossing the line." After all, JP has said all along that he'd lie his butt off if he were a contestant. I think the backlash was much stronger than even they expected. --- UDG Edited to delete a bunch of stuff that I meant to delete but forgot to delete when I was deleting the stuff that was supposed to be deleted.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
|
dabo 26942 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
01-27-04, 10:02 PM (EST)
|
19. "RE: Sleek28's "boot list"" |
The other ASS players hadn't seen Jon in his full villainous glory. They had seen Rupert being who he is.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
speedyforme 228 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Network TV Show Guest Star"
|
01-27-04, 08:34 PM (EST)
|
18. "RE: Sleek28's "boot list"" |
THIS IS WHAT HE SAID ON SUCKS:The boot order and YES in exact boot order is: Tina: Tina did not want to do this show- the media says different, but she was very hesitant and did not seem to be very positive from the beginning- She is the first booted player and while i cannot tell you the vote count (Q knows why) she seems to feel doomed from the start- The tribe does get along well, and even Jerri is kind (at the beginning) In confessionals Jerri does talk about seeing the ouster of Tina and Colby as her main priority- Tina is one you will see that defends her position in survivor history and dismisses this game as a true measure of "survivor"- Jenna and Jerri seem to persuade at least one other to vote off Tina Rudy-- This tribe does not start off well, and that is obvious- Rudy has lost a few steps since survivor one, Rupert does lie to Rudy- whether or not the final editing shows this or not remaiins to be seen- i just laugh because Rupert is seen as a hero but he is just as bad as those he Criticized in PI- Rudy thinks he is Ok but easily is the second boot- Rupert justifies the boot afterward (as usual) Jenna (leaves, not voted out-symbolic tribal council) Jenna leaves game, and i guess that is already known- Originally they were not going to make this a huge part of the episode, BUT the overwhelming feelings of the whole cast were evident- Just to make you Jenna fans feel better- She and Colby were going to be targeted anyway- if they had lost i think Jenna would have been the first boot anyway (we will never know for sure) Rob Cesternino- Rob is well liked by his tribemates- believe it or not this tribe really is the love tribe- they all are very respectful of each other- i thought there would be more friction early on in this tribe and it turned out to be just the opposite- In their confessionals- they are mean and dirty- especially ROBM.- he does this the whole game- If things go as orginally planned, alot of this episode talks about Rob C's strategy and i have to admit that he does not see it coming- the editing starts to show the true tribel leader, Rob M as the leader Jerri-- Swap time- Jerri is the obvious boot in her new living environment- she is one of the very few that leaves with class- she pretty much knows she is going home-nothing too exciting with her Sue-- Sue thinks she is in a position of power, she is not however Lex and Shi Ann lead to her dismissal Ethan-- Ethan acts like a jackass pretty much the whole time he is there- he complains alot, on camera and off- he feels that the set up put him in a tough situation- he knows he is going as well- he threatens to quit the show but does not- voted out easily (he really is a pansy) He also talks alot about how the switch put him in a group of people he does not know that well- i dont know if in the end they focus on that Richard-- Richard loses the most respect of any of the former survivors- his strategy seemed very odd- he wanted to immediately try and minimize his S1 success by acting bizarre- he and Kathy have a huge blowup and the rest join in to vote Richard out- This is the episode where Jeff yells at many of the contestants and they show some of this in this episode- Rich leaves with Rupert calling him "pathetic shell of the survivor 1 champion" Colby-- this is really where the backstabbing gets bad- Jenna Lewis turns her back on her "new" alliance that includes Lex, Cathy, Shi-ann and Rupert- To me Colby seemed like the life of the party on the outback- he really does not do a whole lot on this- He is not the leader, purposely, but his alliance building was not that strong- he has the whole "marked man" complex and is not surprised that someone has turned their back on him- he exits gracefully merge time Lex--- Lex is really cool on this show, but alot of this episode focus's on he and Tom's relationship- Lex is convinced that Tom, Kathy, Shi-Ann, and Rupert are sticking together- Tom specifically talks about the Ethan- Lex final 2 pact and that he has no loyalty- Tom is smart enough to see that he can win by sticking with his original group- Needless to say Lex is chapped on this Kathy-- Shi jumps ship and votes Kathy- this episode is pretty boring- Kathy focuses on persuading the "older" crowd to stick together and form a new alliance- the editing shows it might work but we all know better than that Shi-Ann- Shi thinks she has convinced Alicia and Jenna to vote with her- no shock when Shi goes- I cant stand this girl- she spends the whole game playing to the cameras and bragging as if she is a great manipulator- she also gets bad edit which makes here America's new Jerri- Alicia-- Alicia and Jenna are good friends- Amber and Rob vote Alicia out in a scheme that leaves Alicia in shock- RobM, Amber, Alicia, and Tom all agreed to vote Rupert Jenna L-- Here it gets tricky- lots of changing deals- the voting block focuses on Jenna, Tom, Rupert voting out Rob M-Someone changes their mind ( i would guess Tom) Read between the lines when i say that i have no access to the actual votes Rupert- Tie here- GREAT episode- Amber and Rob vote Rupert, Tom and Rupert vote Rob M (while i cannot tell you for sure, it is obvious through confessionals) Rob M makes deal with Tom at tribal council to change vote and take to final 2- Tom takes deal- just like in PI Rupert actually was pretty cool during this, but just like in Pi his bad moments are not shown Tom- Amber knows exactly what Rob was doing and they discussed before hand what they would do in that event- Rupert was too well liked- Tom is very loved- Rob wins immunity and takes Amber- Tom is livid Amber and Rob M final 2 I do not know final vote- Rob is hated because of his cockiness and backstabbing- Rob also promised on his life he would not betray Tom- Amber is not just flying under the radar during allstars- she is not well like either- I really think it might be closer vote than people would think it would be- I think the players that would vote based on gameplay were booted before Jury- BUT here is the predicted upset- I think Rob's Jury performance is one of the best, if not the best ever- he specifically talks about how great the booted members are; Amber does not do as well- although Rob is hated i think he wins a close vote (just my opinion) He explains in jury every step of every decision
|
|
Top |
| |
|
dabo 26942 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
01-27-04, 10:10 PM (EST)
|
20. "RE: Sleek28's "boot list"" |
How would he know that Rupert's bad moments aren't shown? Has the whole thing been edited together already?
|
|
Top |
| |
|
Brat2u 93 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Hollywood Squares Square"
|
02-05-04, 12:05 PM (EST)
|
70. "RE: Sleek28's "boot list"" |
I always thought the "wedding" was the merging of Drake and Morgan...(still mad that they never showed us any footage of the Outcasts camp.)I recall Jeffie on the Sharon Osbourne Show talking about the Big Lie a while before it actually aired. He sits in during the editing. I tend to agree with you, they probably tweek the episodes before they go on the air.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
dabo 26942 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
02-06-04, 00:08 AM (EST)
|
78. "RE: Sleek28's "boot list"" |
The wedding was a mock wedding held for Christa to commemorate the day on which her wedding had originally been planned but which she had set back in order to be on Survivor. That was advertised by CBS and in TV Guide but in the end the only people who got to see it were those who subscribed to the online Yahoo Survivor Insider (as reported by markopolo100).
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
|
forestforest 28 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Beauty Pageant Celebrity Judge"
|
02-11-04, 11:11 PM (EST)
|
138. "WHAT PEOPLE WITH ACCESS WILL SPOIL AND WHAT THEY WON'T" |
There's a great deal of wisdom in the speculation that anyone with really terrific access would not be likely to post good info in this forum. HOWEVER, I spoiled two ancillary facts for Survivor 7 -- the fact that the finale had been moved to L.A., for example -- but I would never put in writing a boot list. My credentials for spoiling: I've been friends with Al Berman for years (he executive-produces the finale), and I'm married to someone who attends the weekly Friday meeting (the "11:00 o'clock") that all bigwigs at CBS attend, whether in person or by conference call, including, during Survivor's season, Mark Burnett. At these meetings, lips are surprisingly loose and the info always accurate. What I have to lose should be obvious. If I posted anything as potentially harmful to the CBS pocketbook as the boot order, I'd be five million dollars in the hole. The confidentiality agreements have TEETH. FF
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bebo 21083 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
02-02-04, 10:50 AM (EST)
|
62. "Episode 1 Post-Mortem" |
Tina: Tina did not want to do this show- the media says different, but she was very hesitant and did not seem to be very positive from the beginning- This point could be disputed. She is the first booted player and while i cannot tell you the vote count (Q knows why) she seems to feel doomed from the start- She did sense her doom. The tribe does get along well, A relative term - There was quite a bit of sniping going on. and even Jerri is kind (at the beginning) Compared to Jenna, yes. She was toned down this ep. In confessionals Jerri does talk about seeing the ouster of Tina and Colby as her main priority- Did she? She seemed focused on getting rid of the prior winners, although not as focused as Jenna. Tina is one you will see that defends her position in survivor history and dismisses this game as a true measure of "survivor"- TC comments support this. Jenna and Jerri seem to persuade at least one other to vote off Tina We were shown them trying to persuade Rupert, who did vote with them. Whether they persuaded Rudy or Rupert told him who to vote for doesn't matter - statement holds up. Snarky, smart, S7 Anti-Bootee Champ
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
|
|
LozengeofLove 1060 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Politically Incorrect Guest"
|
01-27-04, 11:39 PM (EST)
|
24. "RE: Sleek28's "boot list"" |
LAST EDITED ON 01-27-04 AT 11:51 PM (EST)He claims Sue leaves because Shii and Lex lead to her demise. So that makes one tribe with Shii Ann, Lex and Sue on it. Rich leaves and he and Kathy have a fight, so they must be on a tribe together, right? Colby leaves because Jenna L. turns her back on the alliance of Colby, Lex, Shii Ann, Rupert and Kathy. So the six of them have to be on a tribe together. Add Rich and Sue to that mix, and we discover the "swapped" tribes leave a tribe of 8 vs. a tribe of 6 -- Lex, Shii Ann, Sue, Kathy, Rupert, Colby, Rich, and Jenna L. vs. Tom, Rob M., Amber, Ethan, Jerri and Alicia. It doesn't make sense.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
Brad Lascelle 26 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Beauty Pageant Celebrity Judge"
|
01-28-04, 04:20 AM (EST)
|
25. "Switch Tribe Breakdown That Works" |
Thought I'd repost my views from SSucks over here for kicks...I'll second the argument that if someone was really out to ruin Survivor (and/or the spoiling community as well), the right idea would be to follow Chill1's lead by going after the mainstream media. Spilling your guts in here is pretty moot... we've already been flooded by all the leaks in CBS' plumbing. Thought I'd whip together a switch tribe breakdown scenario that seems to fall in line with sleek's intel. Prior efforts to poke holes into it throughout this thread haven't jived with me given how the tribes all merge together with Colby's departure and we've seen countless instances of old alliances being 'temporarily inconvenienced' by switch scenarios only to re-establish themselves at the official merge (Africa and Amazon being the best examples). TRIBE 1 Alicia {C} Amber {C} Colby {M} Ethan {S} Kathy {M} Richard {M} Rupert {S} TRIBE 2 Jenna L. {S} Jerri {S} Lex {M} Rob M. {C} Shii Ann {M} Susan {C} Tom {C} EP5 - Weaker Tribe 2 loses first challenge after the switch. Chapera has the numbers/strength advantage. Shii Ann is protected by Lex. Lex/Tom restore old alliance ties. Jerri gets deemed the weakest link of the 2 Sabogas and tossed. EP6 - Lex/Shii Ann broker deal with Jenna L. to ensure they don't get swallowed up by the Chapera blockade if they keep losing challenges. Lex works old alliance with Tom to pull Robfather in and avoid tiebreaker. Susan gets snuffed despite 'thinking she's in a position of power'. EP7 - Ethan flames out. Can't trust Rupert or Rich. Lex/Tom on opposing tribe. EP8 - Rich & Kathy have their blowout. Rupert's there to ensure Rich goes down as a 'pathetic shell'. EP9 = Merge ... Jenna's 'new alliance' would be with Lex/Shii Ann (who used her vote to save their own skin) who reunite with Kathy/Colby The Loner and her former Saboga-mate Rupert. Lex's gut may tell him that Tom's on board with him as well, but that isn't necessarily the case. Jenna bolts to Alicia/Amber and Chapera to have young females to hang with now that Jerri's gone and Colby gets outgunned. (Yeah, I realize Chapera+Jenna L. would only make it 5-5... maybe Tom brings in Lex temporarily to toss the Colby immunity threat and avoid a tie. Thus setting Lex up for his surprise downfall in the next episode.) Lex, Kathy and the double-crossing Shii Ann follow. Rupert wins a bunch of immunities and Alicia gets taken down with her new buddy Jenna L. after Rob M./Amber work their eventual F2 powerplay. This is just spec work based on sleek's intel, but I don't see how his boot description theories are 'sketchy' based on post-switch tribe breakdowns 'cause the above suggestion makes plenty of sense to me. I welcome people to poke holes in it, though. == Brad Lascelle <blascelle@gto.net>
|
|
Top |
| |
|
LozengeofLove 1060 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Politically Incorrect Guest"
|
01-28-04, 08:40 AM (EST)
|
26. "RE: Switch Tribe Breakdown That Works" |
I think you're right. i was assuming the Merge was in Episode 10, because 'merge time' was written after the Episode 9 synopsis. However, thinking about it all, you're probably right. i guess I was just hoping this guy didn't turn out to be legit.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Brownroach 15341 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
01-28-04, 12:13 PM (EST)
|
32. "RE: Unclecameraman is back" |
LAST EDITED ON 01-28-04 AT 12:14 PM (EST)Well, the thread is still open on Sucks, as KB noted above, and Griffe and others have been pummeling Sleek with questions. He's been trying to drop hints as to who he is and Wezzie seems to have figured it out. Anyway, I thought all the comments about the editing were strange, as Dabo observed above, but Sleek28 wrote this by way of explanation: Two people do not quit -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Overall the cast is a big group of babies- Two people do not quit- Jeff does ask two players during the game (other than Jenna of course) if they are ready to quit- Ethan IS one of them- Ethan talks about quitting in his confessionals- Anyone that knows survivor knows that editing is a rolling thing and tons of footage needs to be edited first- what makes it in the show is not finalized all the way through- a more behind the scenes approach-
------------------------------------------------- From this and his other posts it appears that Ethan would be the second quitter that Jeff Varner was referring to; but he doesn't quit like Jenna, he ultimately gets voted out.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
Krautboy 2750 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Howard Stern Show Guest"
|
01-28-04, 02:22 PM (EST)
|
34. "Boot List Comparisons" |
From the Sleek28 Thread at SSucks:MarinaSiena MESS member Posts: 903 (1/27/04 8:10 pm) Reply ezSupporter Re: Interesting ... -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Okay, just for the hell of it since I'm sitting here this Tuesday nite twiddling my thumbs... SLEEK-----SNEWS-----CHILLONE Tina------- Rudy------- JennaM----- RobC------- Jerri-------- Sue-------- Ethan------ Rich-------- Colby------ Lex--------Lex Kathy------Kathy Shii-------Alica--------Alica Alica-------Shii--------Shii JennaL-----Tom--------Tom Rupert------Rupert-----Rupert Tom--------JennaL-----JennaL Amber------Amber------RobM RobM-------RobM------Amber Yeah, I know, Snews isn't set in stone And as Griffe points out, non-jury is in alphabetical order so N/A...(yep!) Just for quick comparison because I know it's gonna come up. Edited to remove non-jury Snews picks... ----------------------------------------------------------------- The curious thing is how close these lists are. They either all have a source or they are all the product of shared information and speculation... Snewser has said his list is just a best guess, Chillone's is from "the man", and Sleek28 is a disgruntled employee who was their...but Snewsers list was first? Snewser post at SS in the ChillOne Thread... ------------------------------------------------------- Snewser Registered User Posts: 480 (1/21/04 12:25 pm) Reply ezSupporter Re: Griffe rules -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- You need my avatar, Orange. Actually I was surprised as anyone to see CO's F7 order match the scorecard. That really was best educated guess, and didn't come from the same sources, according to his descriptions. Info for that part of the game almost always turns out to be wrong. It would truly be a first if it turns out to be right. I drew up the list of F9 on the scorecard based on a completely different avenue, and I've changed it once already. In fact, it's kind of bizarre and would make you laugh. I don't think the people CO spoke to could have arrived at the same conclusion the same way. In fact the meshing of conclusions is all very freaky to me now. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Sure sounds like Snewser's list is unsourced...so shouldn't that cause us to question the amazing similarities of the three boot lists?? Krautboy
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
|
shakes the clown 3366 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Car Show Celebrity"
|
01-28-04, 03:30 PM (EST)
|
36. "Please lock this thresd already!" |
...here we go again. It's so obvious that this is total Boolsh!t.First of all, lets look at the disgruntled CBS employee angle. There is no doubt that MB employs a large crew when filming survivor. But, that is the on-location crew. The crew gets much smaller in post production. There are very few people that actually have access to the editing decisions once the show is done filming. For instance, on Love Cruise, there were a grand total of 3 editors, plus a couple of post production producers. Granted, LC is a much smaller in scale show than Survivor, but I don't see how that number could be more than 10-20 for Survivor. You have MB, a handful of producers, story editors, film editors, music editors and that's about it. The reason I bring this up is because in order for Sleek to be correct he would havde to be in this limited circle of post-production people. And if that was the case then he would be one of a small group. Therefore, since there would only be 10-20 people with this info it wouldn't be too hard for MB to figure out who the leak is. And that would lead to a huge lawsuit, plus a total blackballing in the industry. NO WAY someone would risk that to post his info on a spoiler board that has essentially NO IMPACT on mainstream opinion. Total BS! Not to mention the obvious facts that the shows are not edited that far in advance so there is no way he would know what confessionals are used later on in the show. Also, this post is guilty of one of the many "tells" of a liar....the writer supplies way too much factual information than is necessary. Bleu people, feel free to lock this soon, before the newbies start to proclaim the greatness of this info. I'm having S2 deja vu
|
|
Top |
| |
|
lovetowatch 123 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Blistex Spokesperson"
|
01-28-04, 05:53 PM (EST)
|
38. "RE: Please lock this thresd already!" |
Is it actually a spoiler if the "spoiler" is a post production crew member? IMHO a spoiler is vidcap evidence and the like. This board is the best for real spoiler information. This SLEEK guy picked the Sucks board because they thrive on that kind of stuff. Look how long his thread has become. Just my .2
|
|
Top |
| |
|
TeamJoisey 3558 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Thong Contest Judge"
|
01-28-04, 11:10 PM (EST)
|
41. "shakes is right" |
Shakes is right. The people with real info this detailed will not share it, for it will unmask them and ruin their careers. Please, let's not spend any more time inventing scenarios that make this work, because it fails to pass the first test of credibility. This is complete fabrication. Either: a) Someone wants to be talked about for a week or two, and so they run to Sucks, which latches on to any and all lame-ass theories. b) ChillOne is posting as Sleek to make himself look credible, which he is not. c) Someone (EPMB) is having a laugh at Sucks expense. d) All of the above. These reality show contestants need a reality check!
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
Brad Lascelle 26 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Beauty Pageant Celebrity Judge"
|
01-28-04, 06:37 PM (EST)
|
39. "RE: Sleek28's "boot list"" |
LAST EDITED ON 01-28-04 AT 06:40 PM (EST)LAST EDITED ON 01-28-04 AT 06:39 PM (EST) LAST EDITED ON 01-28-04 AT 06:38 PM (EST) There are a couple compelling elements at work here. Is sleek a CBS plant? Well, yeah, he most definitely could be part of their misinformation task force... but then logically he would have reached a different Final Two than all of the other spoilers who have 'sourced' intel. CBS leaks legit detailed episode events to hook people and make them discount the sourced leaks, tosses them a bone and then wham, the spoilers get hosed for falling for a Lex-Shii Ann Final 2 (as an example). A plant that reaches the same conclusion as the sourced intel doesn't serve much purpose... unless the intel is wrong. Are Rob and Amber not F2-bound? Well, it's pretty unusual for a season to have so many independently sourced boot lists all match up with one another preseason. For them ALL not to be accurate would be pretty damned impressive. It either ensures we have a lot of spoiler pretenders out there all seeking glory who will fall on their faces or a concerted disinformation campaign on the part of CBS... either to snowjob all the spoilers or just by introducing 'Sleek The Plant' into the fold to support the incorrectly sourced intel. What if Sleek isn't a plant? This spoiler will be proved questionable pretty quick if some of the clues don't add up even if the bootlist remains accurate. There's just TOO much specific episode details. Once we hit Episode 6 territory when 'Sue thinks she is in a position of power, she is not however Lex and Shi Ann lead to her dismissal', we'll have a good read on whether Sleek is providing mere guesswork or concrete info. He references a LOT of stuff that can't simply be explained away by being edited out and left on the cutting room floor. Nor can Burnett exclude some of Sleek's details from the show edits without sacrificing critical elements of the storyline. If legit, at that point we'll know it's either the real deal or planted info supported by 'initial accurate details' before a 'gotcha' down the road. Is Sleek a disgruntled CBS employee? Has he been fired? Is he one of the team of 10-20 music/footage editors? Is he in casting? Or does he just KNOW one of these 10-20 people and has an inside connection? I don't buy the whole 'I want to ruin Survivor' mantra because he would be putting more of a concerted effort into sharing this intel with radio shock jocks, other online forums, the newswire, newspaper tabloids and other mass media outlets if he really wanted to rock the boat. Posting this intel in cynical Sucksland when the F2 is already known doesn't exactly destroy much. Maybe he's got legit intel via connections, feels he's being vague enough to remain untraceable (or for his contact to remain untraceable), and he's simply hopping on the whole 'praise me as your new god' bandwagon that online Survivor forums have largely deteriorated into since Survivor 'spilling' became the rule and not the exception after Snewser leaked Vecepia winning Marquesas in 2002. Plenty of folks out there get kicks out of adopting aliases and new personas and going online to fill a void of appreciation that they don't get elsewhere in their lives. Survivor fandom is hardly atypical as you'll see this trend in any fan community. Or maybe he's just following ChillOne's lead. Using largely borrowed intel from other spoilers and creating a fiction surrounding them to spice them up and garner attention. Ultimately, this is what all spoilers strive to achieve regardless of whether they're providing concrete facts or complete BS fabrication. If they get attention from folks online, they've accomplished their goal. Right now, Sleek is getting plenty of attention... whether he's right on the money or simply spinning inventive fiction or a plant designed to do BOTH of those things will be determined in short order. == Brad Lascelle <blascelle@gto.net>
|
|
Top |
| |
|
Krautboy 2750 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Howard Stern Show Guest"
|
01-28-04, 07:15 PM (EST)
|
40. "RE: Sleek28's "boot list"" |
Brad, nice summary of the possible scenarios. You've laid it all out very nicely. Now we can all sit back and watch the first few episodes and then decide if we should view this as a complete list or not...I still can't get past the fact that Snewser posted a self proclaimed "best guess" bootlist first, after which ChillOne and Slick28 follow with almost identical lists. Snewser admitted that we would laugh at how he went about assembling the final nine, AFTER ChillOne came up with his matching list. Look back at last season's original Scorecard and compare it to the actual boot order...not even close. The odds are very high against Snewsers Scorecard and the actual boot order matching as closely as Slick28 makes it appear they will... Krautboy
|
|
Top |
| |
|
pmspml5 3263 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Car Show Celebrity"
|
01-29-04, 07:56 AM (EST)
|
42. "RE: Sleek28's "boot list"" |
I agree Krautboy - from the beginning everyone was speculating that Darrah was going to win and she didnt. I love this board but have a hard time believing this one "boot list"
|
|
Top |
| |
Krautboy 2750 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Howard Stern Show Guest"
|
01-29-04, 08:28 AM (EST)
|
43. "Latest update" |
These posts are excerpts from Sleek28's thread at sucks. Sleek promised to send a private E-mail to Griffe (a well respected poster there), explaining why he can't say any more than he already has. These are her posts after she received those e-mails...------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Griffe Registered User Posts: 1899 (1/29/04 4:23 am) Reply ezSupporter Re: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Roadfinder, why are you hostile towards Sleek? He posted only one boot list... he posted it twice but it was the same list. My suggestion to Sleek is to walk away from this. If he's telling the truth, it's not worth getting into trouble over. As to whether his information is accurate or not, my suggestion is to not give up on analysing Survivor episode by episode through vidcaps, storylines, etc. to determine boots. Nothing is ever 100% accurate. Never happened and probably never will. Idislikeeverything Registered User Posts: 422 (1/29/04 4:30 am) Reply Re: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hey Griffe... is there anything else you've been given permission to tell us? I just read 30 pages of build up. Now I want some pay-off! Griffe Registered User Posts: 1900 (1/29/04 4:43 am) Reply ezSupporter Re: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- LOL...what kind of payoff are you looking for, Idislikeeverything? There isn't much I can add to what has already been posted. Sleek has pretty much posted everything he wants to say. All I can do is offer my opinion which is only worth anything to me...lol I don't think it's a hoax but nor do I think that the information and boot list is 100% correct. I wouldn't press him for anything more though because if he's telling the truth, then I don't want him getting into trouble. Spoiling Survivor is something we do for fun... getting someone into trouble because of it is way too serious. Edited by: Griffe at: 1/29/04 5:51 am ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Looks like we will be referring back to Sleek's boot list all season...and comparing it to Snewser's scorecard, and ChillOne's list from "The Man". As I've said before...like it or not, "Spoiling the Spoilers" has become an integral part of spoiling Survivor. Krautboy
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
crayZoZ 29 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Beauty Pageant Celebrity Judge"
|
01-29-04, 05:03 PM (EST)
|
45. "Sleek28's Stuff - A couple of thoughts" |
LAST EDITED ON 01-29-04 AT 05:10 PM (EST)I held my breath when I first read Sleek28's stuff - It got me - I was thinking Sh*t I know the whole freaking story and it hasn't even started on the Teev. Whats in a name - "sleek28" could stand for "Survivor leak to hate". I wonder what VerucaSalt comments on this would be. Does this have any connection to the details sleek has provided. Another thought is that the information appears to come only from someone having access to the confessional time. This would need to include the final confessional comments after each contestant is eliminated and also the one liners that are said when they show who voted for who. It seems that there is no detail on RC or IC winners or episode story lines. If sleek had access to all the confessionals he/she would be able to provide all the details released to date, but would not know if parts would be included/edited into a specific episode. Much like Jeff Varner the conclusions are known but not the detail of what will be edited in, I think Jeff has said - look if CBS don't include it I will spill the beans later. In my view the editing process as indicated by Shakes will not be finalised till just before viewing release. If sleek is a CBS plant for misinformation purposes wouldnt the details released cover a broader range of area's i.e. RC story ars etc Seems to me that sleek28's stuff is probably legit - or perhaps not - Boy I confuse myself somtimes Cheers CrayZoZ
|
|
Top |
| |
|
Brownroach 15341 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
01-29-04, 05:29 PM (EST)
|
46. "Fuhgeddaboudit..." |
Here's the very latest from Griffe, who was trying to pin down Sleek28's credentials:Griffe Registered User Posts: 1903 (1/29/04 2:00 pm) Reply ezSupporter Re: Sleek -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Back. That email last from Sleek came in really late my time. I should have waited until the morning to comment on it since I was very tired...lol Anyway, re-reading his email and trying to find anything in it that can prove one way or the other that Sleek is telling the truth is next to impossible. Nothing in the email can be verified so for all I know this can be one big elaborate hoax. I did ask Sleek one last question last night that could have at least given me some idea if it was possible he was telling the truth about what he did for Survivor and I didn't get a reply. So Q was right in that Sleek avoids and ignores specific questions. So about his boot list... if something looks too good to be true then it usually is. I highly doubt the boots will turn out to be exactly how Sleek layed them out. So I say we ignore this whole thing. If it turns out to be true, then as Q says, we can come back to this thread and say "well fancy that". ---------------------------------------- There you have it. If any of Sleek28's info pans out, chalk it up to a happy coincidence. It's already showing some cracks: Rob Cesternino- Rob is well liked by his tribemates- believe it or not this tribe really is the love tribe- they all are very respectful of each other- i thought there would be more friction early on in this tribe and it turned out to be just the opposite- Compare with the Daily News reporter, who saw half of Episode 1: A second team, Chapera, doesn't have any former winners, but does have a lot of whiners: Susan Hawk, Alicia Calaway and Rob Mariano. and Alicia breaks a land speed record rubbing teammates the wrong way. One kind of contradicts the other, no?
|
|
Top |
| |
|
Krautboy 2750 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Howard Stern Show Guest"
|
01-29-04, 05:34 PM (EST)
|
47. "RE: Sleek28's Stuff - A couple of thoughts" |
LAST EDITED ON 01-29-04 AT 05:44 PM (EST)Crayzoz: Great observations! Based on your observations, we might conclude that Sleek28 is one of the people involved in the editing of the confessionals. Perhaps MB has got the various editors compartmentalized so as to limit the number of people that know the whole story and plotline. The confessional editor theory would also explain why Sleek can't tell us the vote tally...he may not have access to TC footage, but he would be able to surmise who gets voted out by the absence of confessionals for a contestant the following week. Sleek has mentioned that something will hit the media in about three weeks, we'll have to wait and see if that sheds more light on who this is and how much he knows... Krautboy
|
|
Top |
| |
|
Brownroach 15341 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
01-29-04, 06:17 PM (EST)
|
48. "RE: Sleek28's Stuff - A couple of thoughts" |
LAST EDITED ON 01-29-04 AT 06:20 PM (EST)Dammit, KB, just when I'm ready to junk this, you and Crayzoz suck me back in! I reread the whole post and Crayzoz is right, almost all of it sounds descriptive of confessional info, with a few exceptions. Okay. That's certainly an original way to write a hoax. What do you make of all this, though? A couple pre show things: Brian was asked to be on Survivor Allstars and gave no response through his agent- yes Brian had made it clear that any communication from survivor to him would only be through his agent- my opinion is that he was the only winner smart enough to realize he was in a no win situation- for that i will say while i think he is an ass, he realized that by not doing the show, he maintained his pride- there is no way that anyone can look back on all-star and say that the truly best survivor would win- Mark Burnett knows that and had to twist arms to get several to do this, including: Tina, Ethan, Richard, Colby, and to a degree Sue Hawk- the rest were eager in their willingness to do the show-Mark realized that the show could not be pulled off w/o at least some of the former players that were successful- Looking back every single previous winner is going to wish they took the route that Brian did- even i could have predicted that this would be bad news- A couple other things that i am assuming that you might not know- Mike and Rodger were both slated to be on allstars- Originally Rudy was hesitant- Rodger had his spot- Mike had the spot that was given to Rupert- While Coleen and Lis were approached, it was well known that there was no chance they would do the show- Many former survivors were asked if they wanted to do the show and many of those took that to mean that they were being extended an invitation- one perfect example of that is Heidi- feelers were sent out to her, but she was not asked- anyway i could go on and on about casting but you might not even care about that- if you have any ?'s on that then let me know- since i have rambled and not talked about the game i will go ahead and do another thread RIGHT NOW on the game itself- i could write books on this but ill try to keep it brief The one thing i can absolutely swear to -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The one thing i can absolutely swear to is that Brian WAS asked to participate- Yes he is not liked, BUT he was a winner that people would want to see- Mark did less arm twisting, but keep in mind that they were having a VERY hard time getting the better players to agree to do this show- Brian was the only winner asked that ended up not participating- Tina was the last that agreed to do the show, Brian was a NO from day one and Mark did not push it Why would a confessional editor (or any kind of editor) know all of this detail? The casting process is entirely unrelated to production. He also wrote: I had heard of this website, some from previous survivor contestants and some talk from Mark himself- Several times in these posts he implies he knows MB. Maybe this really is disinformation? kind of wants this to go away now...
|
|
Top |
| |
|
Krautboy 2750 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Howard Stern Show Guest"
|
01-29-04, 06:56 PM (EST)
|
49. "RE: Sleek28's Stuff - A couple of thoughts" |
> >Why would a confessional editor (or >any kind of editor) know >all of this detail? >The casting process is entirely >unrelated to production. He >also wrote: I don't know much about what goes on behind the scenes, but I would imagine that before the filming and editing starts, there would be planning sessions and meetings. Wouldn't MB sit doen with his team of editors and discuss the contestants being considered? It seems MB would be foolish not to get input from the editors who see all the raw footage and know which contestants being considered provide the best opportunities for good quality sound bites... Krautboy
|
|
Top |
| |
|
forestforest 28 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Beauty Pageant Celebrity Judge"
|
02-12-04, 11:58 PM (EST)
|
150. "IS MARK BURNETT A FOOL?" |
Krautboy suggests that it would be foolish for Mark Burnett to pass up an opportunity to consult with his editors concerning which contestants give good good sound bite.I'm pretty blown away that Krautboy has so much faith in MB's essential humanity. MB does not doubt or need consultations. He's a self-proclaimed genius who loves to toot his own horn and make people uncomfortable. MB would take his own word on anything. So, I'd ixnay any pre-shoot consults with the folks in the editing bays. I'll also bet you $4,675.37 that Sleek is NOT a MB plant. I can't see MB handing out the assignment: "Sleek, my boy, I want you to go on the internet and put a cork in some of those online blabbermouths with too much time on their hands. Here's what I want you to type . . ." Burnett wouldn't stoop to conquer. And, even if he did, he'd use a less-bumbling tool than Sleek. So who is Sleek? No doubt he/she'll bide his/her time and tell us a bedtime story when good and ready. NOTHING that Sleek has done has the pizz-azz of a Mark Burnett Production. Sleek's production values are very low. I wonder how "pizz-azz" is really spelled. FF
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
idiotcowboy 1135 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Politically Incorrect Guest"
|
01-29-04, 09:29 PM (EST)
|
52. "Three Options" |
There are exactly three options here.#1. This guy is a LIAR. Taking whatever piece-meal information he might have gotten and concocted it into a story for his amusement and our expense. In which case he is not there to help the people interested in spoiling the show, in fact he is there only to mock and laugh his ass off at us. #2 This guy is telling the complete and total truth. In which case he is the biggest DUMBASS that EPM ever hired. He will in all likelihood get himself sued for more money than he will ever be worth and run out of the industry to the point he will never ever work in it again AND in the wild event that he does not get caught? He will likey cost not only himself a job, but the entire group of people he works a job as well, as Mark Burnett does strike me as a man who would tolerate a snake in his organization. So for his amusement he will have ruined not only his own livelihood but potentially others too, making him not only a DUMBASS but an WHOLEASS as well. #3 He is part of the DISINFORMATION campaign. Planted by EPM to leak certain select information, some of which will be correct, and some complete fabrication for the direct purpose of misleading us. I suppose we should be honored if this is it, but the bigger honor would be exposing it! Meaning of course he is either a LIAR, a DUMBASS, or a PLANT, and while I dont discount what he said I will never respect his method or his motive. -ICB not a fan of Uncle Cameraman either...
|
|
Top |
| |
|
dabo 26942 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
01-29-04, 09:41 PM (EST)
|
53. "Agree" |
I just cannot fathom any reason why anyone in a position to know these things would reveal that knowledge in this fashion, not even for revenge.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
|
crayZoZ 29 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Beauty Pageant Celebrity Judge"
|
01-29-04, 10:03 PM (EST)
|
54. "RE: Sleek28's Stuff - A couple of thoughts" |
The details about casting seem to be said secondhand to me they are presented as if someone told someone who overheard something. I would not be suprised if the crew involved were not all given an overview of who was wanted by MB and the part he wanted them to play - each team is constructed with at least one eye candy male and female,an older male and female,a nerdie person ( I dont know if thats a word so eg skinny ryan/jon fairplay type ) and a out there person ( eg Rich, Alicia Shi-ann) It looks like Sleek28 info comes directly from some one involved in the editing - KB idea that the editors may be compartmentalised seems good to me. Some info would still pass from group to group through the tea room etc Sleeks comment in the last paragragh about he absolutely knows for fact that Brian blah blah blah..... Gives the impression that the other details above might only be at a gossip level. I'd guess Sleek is a partner of an editor who socialises with others in the production crew. The conviction of the statements fron the boot list is completely different from the casting stuff The comment that he could write a whole book on the subject I also thought interesting. Cheers crayZoZ
|
|
Top |
| |
Brad Lascelle 26 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Beauty Pageant Celebrity Judge"
|
01-30-04, 00:21 AM (EST)
|
57. "RE: Sleek28's "boot list"" |
(I posted the following observations in another forum to counter the popular theory that Sleek's boot order is obviously wrong due to Richard getting tossed 8th. I wanted to play Devil's Advocate, so here's what I came up with.)The prevailing logic behind Hatch getting ousted before Jerri is the infamous Patagonia spoiler... which, ironically enough... didn't actually place Rich in the immediate company of Sleek's 1st, 2nd and 4th boots (Tina, Rudy and Rob C.). It was Snewser that pegged Rich in Patagonia with the other pre-merge boots with the other early boots trekking off to Mexico City. It's being presumed right now that both groups were shipped out of Panama in sequence. Thus, if Rich did indeed head to South America and not Panama... he MUST be booted 5th and not 8th. But no spoiler has outright said it must be so. It's just a common presumption. It's quite possible that Tina, Rudy and Rob ventured off to South America on their own and Rich headed down to meet up with them instead of sticking around Panama for an eventual trip to Mexico City with Jerri, Ethan (who, according to Sleek', behaved like a royal ass and may have been booted courtesy of Rich), Sue and Colby. I know that if I was Rich and given the company and locale, I'd prefer the Patagonia trip. It's not like CBS couldn't afford to fly him out on his own. They did whisk Jenna to the States and back (albeit under tragic circumstances), after all. Maybe the original intention was to have the first 4 ejections from the game head to Patagonia and the second group of 5 head to Mexico City and Jenna's departure threw a curve in the scheduling. Or maybe both groups were shipped out of Panama at the same time and the fact that consecutive boots Tina-Ruby-Rob C. decided to travel together is simply due to having spent the most time together in Loser Lodge... and NOT because their group left before the Mexico group. It's just coincidence and Rich chooses to tag along. Finally, if Sleek is indeed getting much of his intel from confessional footage and/or a contact in editing, botching the order of a Rich-Kathy blowup NINE days early is hard to fathom. You're talking about significant facial hair growth. Not to mention the absence of confessionals from Jerri, Sue and Ethan... one of whom (most likely Ethan but possibly also Jerri) would be on Rich's reshuffled tribe and would likely comment on the incident and/or be involved in voting Hatch out of the game. If Sleek's legit and not a plant or a kid with a clever imagination, I find it terribly unlikely that he'd 'miss calling the Rich boot' by a 9-day margin. Just doesn't seem likely unless he's getting third-hand information. Just my two cents. == Brad Lascelle (blascelle@gto.net)
|
|
Top |
| |
|
CaptainP 55 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Hollywood Squares Square"
|
01-30-04, 10:49 AM (EST)
|
58. "RE: Sleek28's "boot list"" |
LAST EDITED ON 01-30-04 AT 03:15 PM (EST)Hehe. I'm a Rich fan, and I'm kinda hoping that Sleek's Boot Order is correct. I find it funny that the guy with the biggest target on his back would somehow make it to just before the final merge. Sleek even says that his tribe's two biggest targets if Mogo Mogo was to go to TC were Jenna and Colby, indicating that Rich somehow formed some sort of alliance there w/ Kathy, Lex, and Shi Ann. It seems that the disolution of his alliance would also lead to his ouster with the blow-up between himself and Kathy. Like all of you, I'm kind of taking this list with some caution. It does seem like it could be misleading information given the fact that just about EVERYBODY has the same kind of boot order, even JV. At the same time though, little clues are kind of indicating that it could be correct in some way, hence all of the Amber mentioning before the show to hype up her role. Well, we knew going in to this that some of our favorites would be gone early. Still, the show should make for some very interesting tv!
|
|
Top |
| |
munson 1314 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Beef Jerky Spokesperson"
|
01-31-04, 05:38 PM (EST)
|
59. "The latest from sleek28" |
sleek28 had returned for another post and run. In the lastest he addresses motive and how he arrived at the boot list.sleek28 Registered User Posts: 16 (1/31/04 3:00 am) Reply Quick message -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- .....One thing i want to make absolutely clear- I CANNOT GET INTO A MOTIVE OF WHY I DID WHAT I DID- I THINK YOU WILL ALL UNDERSTAND IN 3-4 WEEKS FROM NOW - It also kills me to not be able to talk about intimate details of the show- i think that most of you can read between the lines on the facts surrounding my situation I will say that there are issues with several contestants as well as MANY involved with the show- who knows what could happen- Griffe understands the issues surrounding this and when it is all said and done she should feel free to use discretion with that information I am writing this wanting to answer 100's of questions, talk about the survivor family, behind the scenes, etc, but i just can't do it- one day i will I can also feel safe in saying that no one, including Mark, knows the complete story from minute to minute- even crew, production, editing, can speak of maybe 10% of being on scene or viewing- it takes alot of work and effort to bring the team together to tell the ultimate story- literally 24 hours a day- I could go on about this, but i will say that while i feel comfortable with my knowledge on what took place, some of it does come second hand- deductive reasoning around facts are what puts me at ease with the vote-off order- to answer the big question- YES, there is alot of second hand information that goes into what my analysis says, but the end results are what i feel certain about- I realize it is irritating as hell to try and see exactly what i am saying, but it will eventually make sense- maybe Griffe can word it better for me.... griffe mentioned she will be looking for notice of legal filings following the 3 to 4 week period mentioned by sleek, just around the time of E3 or E4. If sleek is legit, here's where we get the answer to motive. Hmmm, issues with several contestants and others invloved with the show? Could that be any more vague? He also mentions that some of his intel comes second-hand, implying most is first-hand, and the remainder is deductive reasoning. At this point, I really could care less if the list is legit. I do want to know if sleek28 is, though. Honestly, I'm such a sucker for this stuff that I couldn't ignore this guy now if I tried.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
|
munson 1314 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Beef Jerky Spokesperson"
|
02-02-04, 07:12 PM (EST)
|
67. "RE: Tina's CBS Web Chat" |
The Patagonia3 were spotted by a co-worker of colleenlover the week that filming wrapped. colleenlover posted her spoiler on Monday, December 15, the day her co-worker returned to work.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
shakes the clown 3366 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Car Show Celebrity"
|
02-05-04, 10:30 PM (EST)
|
71. "can we please lock this NOW!" |
Rudy-- This tribe does not start off well, and that is obvious- Rudy has lost a few steps since survivor one, Rupert does lie to Rudy- whether or not the final editing shows this or not remaiins to be seen- i just laugh because Rupert is seen as a hero but he is just as bad as those he Criticized in PI- Rudy thinks he is Ok but easily is the second boot- Rupert justifies the boot afterward (as usual)...thanks for playing Unkle, but the gig is up. There is no way the "info" about Rupert screwing over Rudy can be justified/rationalized or blamed on selective editing. Simply put, this "spoiler" has been proven a fake 100% tonight and anyone dumb enough to even think of defending it from now on will be flamed relentlessly.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Brad Lascelle 26 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Beauty Pageant Celebrity Judge"
|
02-05-04, 11:17 PM (EST)
|
74. "RE: can we please lock this NOW!" |
Sleek's response to Shakes & The 'Sucks Cynics (try saying that 5 times fast)... (courtesy of the Survivor Sucks forums)"You have got to be kidding me??" What i have said is not true? i have lied? All of you that are now trying to say that i am not for real are just plain wrong. At first Q called me some very abusive names that i overlooked- i am not going to take that kind of abuse anymore- Let me make it clear- i have said all i need to say, and i said it to griffe- that is all i can talk about- I am not a cameraman. I do not know who won the rewards, or many other things that some of you seem to think would legitimize what i am saying I have honnestly been responsible for 2%-5% of any actual footage- For you to say it is not easy to fill in the blanks, then you do not know my capacity with Survivor Here is what i find the biggest joke of all. I told all of you that i have had NO exposure ahead of time to these boards. Let's just say for the sake of argument that i am lying to all of you and i am some random person posting a dream message- Like i told all you before- i spent a ton of time on all of these sites AFTER my original post, but once again for the sake of argument lets just say i did a ton of research before my post: After my message i found only 2 "spoilers" that came even close to anything that i said: One was the horseback post involving Tina, Rob C, and Rudy- The other was Chill's bootlist which had Ethan First and then a correction to Tina first and Ethan second- wait a minute, then a correction to Rudy being second- Changes like this and you are questioning what I AM SAYING??? Give me a break There is a huge difference between Ethan going 7th like i say or Ethan going first or second like chill says- i do not know chill, but i will soon find out who this is- i have a hard time believing some broken english speaking worker keeps contact with Chill as he "remembers" things- I am not saying chill is lying, just please don't put our info in the same context Just because i am truly non-stop thinking and irritated i will play your game and show how those that are speaking out against me are really going out of their way to take my truths and spin them into their "lies" Here is what i said about Tina (keeping in mind that i do not see actual game footage, challenges, or tribal councils- while i did work on the most important part of the game, truly knowing what is going on): ((Tina: Tina did not want to do this show- the media says different, but she was very hesitant and did not seem to be very positive from the beginning- She is the first booted player and while i cannot tell you the vote count (Q knows why) she seems to feel doomed from the start- The tribe does get along well, and even Jerri is kind (at the beginning) In confessionals Jerri does talk about seeing the ouster of Tina and Colby as her main priority- Tina is one you will see that defends her position in survivor history and dismisses this game as a true measure of "survivor"- Jenna and Jerri seem to persuade at least one other to vote off Tina)) Anyone with a brain can read the above post and see that if i did not have inside info that i could not have just predicted that out of thin air- use your freakin' brains!! 1000's of hours into each episode, including hundreds of confessional situations- Jerri DID talk about wanting to see the ouster of Tina and Colby- it was just not necessary to show it- I knew for sure, by hearing reaction of their votes, that Jerri and Jenna voted for Tina- i said clearly that they convinced AT LEAST ONE MORE PERSON to vote her out- i stated i did not know the final result, but i knew that AT LEAST one more person DID vote for her- So because it was two more that voted for her, i am lying?? give me break, you egomaniacs Now onto this episode's statements: ((Rudy-- This tribe does not start off well, and that is obvious- Rudy has lost a few steps since survivor one, Rupert does lie to Rudy- whether or not the final editing shows this or not remaiins to be seen- i just laugh because Rupert is seen as a hero but he is just as bad as those he Criticized in PI- Rudy thinks he is Ok but easily is the second boot- Rupert justifies the boot afterward (as usual))) NO ONE IN YOUR SURVIVOR COMMUNITY PREDICTED THAT RUDY WOULD BE VOTED OUT SECOND- 99% of you in your reactions said that i was crazy and would be disproven- So AFTER my prediction- Snewser (who you all know has his own source predicts Rudy TODAY)- IF I had never posted this original message, i have no doubt that Snewser would have made this prediction, but the fact is that i made this prediction, with explanation over two weeks ago- WHO ELSE PREDICTED THIS BEFORE ME?? now to break down what i said "This tribe does not start off well, and that is obvious- Rudy has lost a few steps since survivor one"--- I cant believe any of you are actually trying to say this is incorrect- finishing last of three in two immunity challenges is not starting off good, plain and simple- anyone arguing this is just not worth listening too "Rupert does lie to Rudy- whether or not the final editing shows this or not remaiins to be seen- i just laugh because Rupert is seen as a hero but he is just as bad as those he Criticized in PI-" Anyone behind the scenes on PI knows that Rupert did get the good edit- personally i like him, BUT why do you all think that the entire cast of PI felt Rupert was a hypocrite? he was mad at Jon for voting for him, but Rupert turned around and instead of voting for Jon (who backstabbed him), he voted off Sean (who saved Rupert's ass the TC before)- If any other survivor had done this, they would have been persecuted by all of you....... RUPERT DID LIE TO RUDY, and this will come out- I never said i knew that Rupert VOTED for RUDY- i could not say that one way or another- If you see confessionals right before TC, many times you think that someone else is going- I will say this one time- IF Rupert had been broadsided i could understand your disbelief, BUT you saw the discussions Rupert was having about voting Rudy off- do you think Rudy as Ruperts true ally, ever heard about that from Rupert? HE DID NOT HEAR ANYTHING OF THE SORT from Rupert- Rudy flat our asked Rupert if there was a chance he was going to be voted out- Rupert told him no- Rupert also knew that there was a likelyhood that the girls were going to join Ethan in voting out Rudy- IF Rupert was a great ally, why would he not mention this discussion to Rudy- Look most of you are pretty smart- If you cannot see what really happened by viewing less than 1% of the actual footage shown, then don't blame me because i know more than you- Two weeks ago you called me crazy, seeing no way that this could happen- you see Rupert choosing not to tell Rudy any of the negative conversations he had with the others- Rupert knew however he voted, HE WAS NOT A SWING VOTE- he knew he was safe, so he chose not to stir the water and protect his friend- he let Jenna and Jerri lie to Rudy when he knew there was the possibility Rudy was leaving Many of you think that as the story goes on, my predictions are more believable- YET look back when i posted originally- you all thought that the story did not make sense- Now it is making sense, and you say i am getting lucky- For the record, i am more concerned about the attacks on my credibility than i am on what you think of my predictions- Don't look back afterward, when every word i have said is true, and dismiss it with your bullshit- i do not and have not seen any final edited episodes- there are 100's of one on one interactions, group interactions etc- most of them never make the light of day past the editing room- i tried to focus on the storylines that i thought would make it out, and so far i am batting 100%- i will continue to bat 100% Finally once and for all, for those of you with a brain (most of you do have one)- many of you have nailed my exact thoughts- some of you choose to spin my 100% proven truths and turn them into lies- I AM THE ONLY ONE THAT HAS PREDICTED THE BOOT ORDER, AND I AM THE ONLY ONE THAT HAS BEEN 100% RIGHT in every single thing i have said through 2 episodes- i will continue to be right, and in a few weeks, when the story breaks, you should all know my reasoning- Until then feel free to question chillone (for gods sakes he deserves it)- feel free to find out who snewser's source is (i really want to know that one), BUT please, be smart when you judge as the show goes along- put yourselves back almost 3 weeks ago, and think about how crazy you all thought my original post was- walk in my shoes and you will see that even through just two episodes, there is no way i could have made this up For the 75% of you that have used logic in your posts and supported my statements, i give a big shout out ---- Until next time Sleek28
|
|
Top |
| |
|
shakes the clown 3366 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Car Show Celebrity"
|
02-06-04, 12:54 PM (EST)
|
89. "yet another reason why its BS" |
...if this was true then why would he feel the need to come back with this lengthly defense last night? It seems pretty obvious to me that if it was true the author would simply write a one sentence response akin to "I don't care if you don't believe me, you'll see in time who has the last laugh." Why go into a 5 page defense if you truly feel that you don't need to do any explaining?Its BS, plain and simple, no matter how accurate the boot list is. Call it a good guess or good speculation, but its no more a spoiler than Unklecameraman. And another thing, if this spoiler proves true I vow to never return to the spoiler boards again as a punishment for my negativity towards the "greatest spoiler in survivor history". That's called putting your money where your mouth is.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
GetMeOuttaHere 43 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Beauty Pageant Celebrity Judge"
|
02-06-04, 05:52 PM (EST)
|
99. "RE: yet another reason why its BS" |
Why come back Shakes? One too many martinis?
|
|
Top |
| |
|
GetMeOuttaHere 43 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Beauty Pageant Celebrity Judge"
|
02-06-04, 06:15 PM (EST)
|
102. "RE: yet another reason why its BS" |
Er...I was actually replying to Shakes post? Huh?
|
|
Top |
| |
|
tribephyl 12393 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
02-06-04, 06:15 PM (EST)
|
101. "RE: yet another reason why its BS" |
... oooooo ....Now were taunting the evil clown. Shouldn't be much longer till the moniker becomes past tense. But you can call me tribe. S7ABCABP Winner
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SurvivorBlows 15230 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
02-06-04, 00:11 AM (EST)
|
79. "RE: can we please lock this NOW!" |
LAST EDITED ON 02-06-04 AT 00:39 AM (EST)I'm not a fan of this spoiler (I have a hard time believing anyone in a position to be handling the actual film would run to a Survivor website -- and if someone is, then Burnett has an even bigger problem than anyone ever thought) but I can certainly see a case where Rupert might have "lied" to Rudy. As Ice points out in the East Coast thread, Rudy apparently thought Ethan was going. And Rupert appears to have had knowledge that Jerri and Jenna were actually going to vote for Rudy -- not Ethan. It might be a lie of omission, and a mercy killing, but it's still a lie. The "gig" that should be "up" is the one that involves making impulsive proclamations based on a couple of minutes of pre-TC footage from tonight. For all we know, Rupert could open Ep3 by saying "I knew J&J were planning on going after Rudy, and I approached Ethan about allying with Rudy and I, but Ethan said he'd rather take his chances at getting booted tonight rather than be teamed with a crippled and soon to possibly be sick old man for the next 33 days, so there was nothing I could do but let it play out..." -SB
|
|
Top |
| |
|
dabo 26942 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
02-06-04, 00:23 AM (EST)
|
81. "RE: can we please lock this NOW!" |
Or Rupe may have tried to get Jeri or Jenna to change their votes and that wasn't shown either.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
mavsfan 693 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Reality Show Commentator"
|
02-06-04, 02:24 AM (EST)
|
85. "Rudy WAS lied to" |
<< There is no way the "info" about Rupert screwing over Rudy can << be justified/rationalized or blamed on selective editingCorrect me if I'm wrong, but didn't Rudy say in his post TC confessional something along the line of "2 hours ago I was told I was safe. These folks better look out 'cause I've got friends"? It sounds to me like someone lied to Rudys face - someone like oh I don't know, Maybe Rupert. This fits perfectly with Sleeks pregame post. Wasn't Sleek vetted by Q and Griff? Two "established spoilers" who know the smell of BS? Maybe Sleek just guessed all this, but I doubt it. I suspect Sleek is either legit, or an MB plant. And not just a 13 year old kid with an overactive imagination looking for attention. << anyone dumb enough to even think of defending it from now on << will be flamed relentlessly. Nothing like flaming to discourage Debate and Newbies.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
MDSkinner 716 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Reality Show Commentator"
|
02-06-04, 11:59 AM (EST)
|
86. "RE: can we please lock this NOW!" |
Shakes, you are welcome to flame me relentlessly, but I am interested to see how this pans out when we get to the Jerri vote out on his list. At this point nothing that sleek has said has been false (to my knowledge) since it is tough to say whether or not Rupert lied to Rudy. Rupert stayed loyal to Rudy in that he never did vote for him and in fact he did vote with him, but he may well have known that the other three were going to vote Rudy out. That being said, you could look at him as having lied to Rudy, by not informing him. This is something we can not know, due to the editing.That being said, I have no reason to totally discount this spoiler until the Jerri boot, which I am not thoroughly convinced will happen. Chillone on the other hand, is a total jackass trying to sell a book. He has now changed both of his picks? He is a worthless lemming. The sleek list may turn out to be the same, but I personally will keep it in mind at least for a few more episodes. Bring the flames.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
|
SurvivorBlows 15230 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
02-06-04, 12:35 PM (EST)
|
88. "RE: can we please lock this NOW!" |
LAST EDITED ON 02-06-04 AT 12:36 PM (EST)>Chillone on the other hand, is a total jackass trying to >sell a book. He has now changed both of >his picks? He is a worthless lemming. Glad to see some other folks now realizing with what was already obvious to some of us months ago... the guy is a total fraud -- and has been since he first started with his "revisionist history" of what he proclaimed and when it was proclaimed. -SB
|
|
Top |
| |
crayZoZ 29 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Beauty Pageant Celebrity Judge"
|
02-05-04, 11:55 PM (EST)
|
77. "SLeek28's Stuff - No Clowning around" |
I for one think sleeks legit and am keen to see an episode by episode topic devoted to sleek's stuff being confirmed or disected.Shakes has a great sense of humour and a good bite.. Hope I dont get any teeth marks in me Wouldn't it be good to cut sleek some slack as he will provide lots of spoiling discussion which surely is the main reason we are all here. Cheers crayZoZ
|
|
Top |
| |
|
Get Bent 293 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Network TV Show Guest Star"
|
02-06-04, 00:40 AM (EST)
|
82. "RE: SLeek28's Stuff - No Clowning around" |
It is interesting Sleek is posting here now. This is a much better site, let's give him some slack.Shakes, I had the exact same reaction you did with the Rupert thing. I thought Sleek could now be discounted. BUT... I think it can be in the perception of the event. I love Rupert for so many reasons, so I percieve that he kept his word to Rudy by not voting for him, and rationalized not telling Rudy. Personally, I don't hold the omission against Rupert. What can I say, I love the guy. But Sleek doesn't have the same perception as 90 percent of the viewers and doesn't love Rupert, therefore he felt Rupert wronged Rudy. And that case can be made I am sure. Anyway, after a few minutes of consideration, I don't think that we can hold Sleeks perception of Rupert against him for now. Now that he is posting here, let's pick his brain! See what else he has. Of course it could be a load of crap, but hey, thats what we are here for. To make our own perception.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
|
lovetowatch 123 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Blistex Spokesperson"
|
02-06-04, 02:13 PM (EST)
|
90. "RE: SLeek28's Stuff - No Clowning around" |
I was also wondering about their choice of boards to post on. Snewser doesn't post here either. This board has class. Over there they are nasty posters. Maybe that's the point. More attention over there?
|
|
Top |
| |
|
GetMeOuttaHere 43 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Beauty Pageant Celebrity Judge"
|
02-06-04, 07:16 PM (EST)
|
106. "RE: SLeek28's Stuff - No Clowning around" |
Call me boring,stupid,or whatever. If I could have logged onto the 2003 Fiesta Bowl and found out who won before it was played out,I would have.Therefore missing the most exciting sports moment in college sports to me,ever.(OSU,I am a Buckeye) But this is a reality show,it's not live like football.I never watch football,basketball,or baseball recasts.But I love knowing who will win. That's just me,and obviously many other Survivor fans or we would not be posting here.
|
|
Top |
| |
munson 1314 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Beef Jerky Spokesperson"
|
02-06-04, 04:29 PM (EST)
|
95. "sleek on E3" |
OK, no harm to play along, I guess. Let's take a look at what sleek has for E3:Jenna (leaves, not voted out-symbolic tribal council) Jenna leaves game, and i guess that is already known- Originally they were not going to make this a huge part of the episode, BUT the overwhelming feelings of the whole cast were evident- Just to make you Jenna fans feel better- She and Colby were going to be targeted anyway- if they had lost i think Jenna would have been the first boot anyway (we will never know for sure) Do we know if two people leave the game this week? I'm not sure if there is any consensus yet. Tough call here. Thanks to Snewser (I believe) we knew before sleek posted that Jenna6 left on Day 8. sleek mentions this. A symbolic TC lends some credibilty to sleek's info I guess, but this was speculated before his post as well. As for JennaM and Colby as targets, any reference to this point would have to be considered a hit. While it makes sense - a previous winner and a F2 challehge ho - Rich is the obvious target. It's not like he's been a big help around camp this time around either. Of course, because sleek never claimed to see the final edited version, any discussion of Mogo targets could get left on the cutting room floor. If we get the Jenna6 voluntary exit along with a standard boot, then the next bit of intel could be telling, whether it comes in E3 or 4: Rob Cesternino- Rob is well liked by his tribemates- believe it or not this tribe really is the love tribe- they all are very respectful of each other- i thought there would be more friction early on in this tribe and it turned out to be just the opposite- In their confessionals- they are mean and dirty- especially ROBM.- he does this the whole game- If things go as orginally planned, alot of this episode talks about Rob C's strategy and i have to admit that he does not see it coming- the editing starts to show the true tribel leader, Rob M as the leader We had Rob6 in Patagonia with Tina and Rudy a long time before sleek showed up. This one isn't a stretch. The fact that Rob4 is the architect of this boot is, again, not a surprise. What? Like it was going to be Amber's call? Or Tom for that matter? (Does bodog or intertops give odds on whether or not Big Tommy will give Sue a "wake-up" vote, a la Clarence, if everyone is voting Rob6?) The "love tribe"? Really? I know everyone is trying to play nice but c'mon. Yep, the confessionals can be brutal but the tension in Chapera is palpable. Alicia has had moments with Rob4 and Tom. Tom has issues with Sue and Alicia. Rob4 and Sue? Oil and water. And from the website preview, the tension continues in E3. Even if we give sleek the benefit of the doubt about Rupert's "lie," this information is already questionable, IMHO. And in rebuttal to sleek's most recent post, I think plenty of us had Rudy as the second boot. We didn't need sleek's help for that one. Sorry, buddy.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
|
MDSkinner 716 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Reality Show Commentator"
|
02-06-04, 05:07 PM (EST)
|
97. "RE: sleek on E3" |
I agree with you munson, in that we should not blindly believe the sleek spoiler, but I do not think it should be totally discounted yet either. I tend to agree with you that Jenna leaving the game, and Rob6 getting the following boot would not be that big of a stretch, due to other spoilers that came out before sleek. I really think that the episode where he has Jerri getting the boot will be more telling than any of these first 4. Even if he hits that one on the head, we should still question the reliability of this spoiler, but I think it would be nuts to just throw it out. Questionable, it definitely is, but it is also a bit too close to discount all together, this week anyway.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
VerucaSalt 1580 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Peanut Festival Grand Marshall"
|
02-06-04, 05:25 PM (EST)
|
98. "RE: sleek on E3" |
Well far be it from me to pass up an entertaining read, made up or not The first couple of boots have already been posted, re-posted and then posted again and the original spoiler (if you will) was the sighting of Tina, Rudy, Rob C. together along with our known information about Jenna M./mother sooooo this lengthy post by this "sleek" doesn't mean anything to me until after these boots are finished since "sleek" could simply be using the information we all had access to for quite some time. Now, I will say if Jerri does indeed go I'll maybe only raise one eyebrow at "sleek", not two of them. This "swap" he/she mentions however could have easily been "gleaned" from SNN report which states The three tribes merged into two tribes on or before Day 13 (Nov. 15th) so his "information" of "swap time" is something that has already been put forth. However, I am not sure that Jerri, IMO, would be the candidate to go either; frankly it could be a crapshoot between a couple of people. Regardless, this is just yet another "list" that makes me want to throw my hands up and say my job is now obsolete as speculation based on clues, caps and watching the show is no longer necessary (sniff) So
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
|
|
Raistlin212 17 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Got Milk? Spokesperson"
|
02-06-04, 07:47 PM (EST)
|
107. "RE: Sleek28's "boot list"" |
Reviewing his next couple of picks and explainations:3. Jenna Morasca leaves game, and i guess that is already known...She and Colby were going to be targeted anyway We'll see quickly, but this seems to fit everything we know. It's 99% certain she leaves during early stage filming. And analysis of her tribe indicates that her and Colby are the weaker links. Many people figured Rich would be the least liked person in camp, so he bucked the trend and is probably right. 4. Rob Cesternino...Rob is well liked by his tribemates...this tribe really is the love tribe...they all are very respectful of each other...In their confessionals they are mean and dirty...especially ROBM...If things go as orginally planned, alot of this episode talks about Rob C's strategy...the editing starts to show the true tribel leader Rob M Obviously we have a few hints about the fact that RobC is anearly boot. If Chapera does have to go to TC in episode 4, he's probably on the chopping block. Look at other parts though: they actually get along fairly well in camp but rip on each other in confessionals. That's pretty accurate. There could have been a lot of fighting, but after the whole beds vs fire fight they've been pretty good to each other. Even when Alicia kind of stepped in and took charge of the fire, there wasn't a lot of grumbling (mainly because she was right). RobM has been awfully cocky in his confessionals. RobC knows he needs to do something now, so there would be a lot of action on his part. His best bet is to recruit Sue and Alicia and if he loses it's going to be because one of them doesn't go along. Sleek claims that RobC doesn't see it coming, perhaps either Sue or Alicia switches sides at the last second....very possible and playing right into his spoilers since he has Sue getting kicked out next opportunity and Alicia being carreid to near the end. If RobC thinks he's got Alicia but she crosses him to join with Tom/Amber/RobM....then I think this guy's onto something. After the swap: 5. Jerri Manthey...Jerri is the obvious boot in her new living environment
6. Susan Hawke -- Sue thinks she is in a position of power, she is not however Lex and Shi Ann lead to her dismissal By here we should be able to tell how legit he is. He's basically giving us how the first swap/merge recombines the remaining people, and the week it happens. When I went through all his later info I found something out. He says that in Ep6 that Sue, Lex, and Shii Ann are in the same tribe. He says that in Ep9 JennaL, Lex, Kathy, Shii Ann and Rupert are in a tribe. He says that in Ep8 that Rich, Rupert, and Kathy are in one tribe. He says all of this happens before the final merge in Ep10. That means one of the tribes would have to be (in his boot order): Tribe A Sue (gone pre-merge) Rich (gone pre-merge) Lex Kathy Shii Ann JennaL Rupert Tribe B Jerri (gone pre-merge) Ethan (gone pre-merge) Colby (gone pre-merge) Alicia Tom Amber RobM
Argue the dynamics of those hypothetical tribes for a few minutes...
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Brad Lascelle 26 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Beauty Pageant Celebrity Judge"
|
02-07-04, 05:31 AM (EST)
|
117. "RE: Sleek28's "boot list"" |
LAST EDITED ON 02-07-04 AT 05:33 AM (EST)We've had some extensive discussion over on Sucks tonight about the expected tribal shuffle for Episode 5 as per Sleek's episode descriptions. My initial suggestion from a week ago is as follows... TRIBE A - Jenna L., Jerri, LEX, Rob M., SHII ANN, SUSAN, TOM TRIBE B - Alicia, Amber, Colby, ETHAN, KATHY, RICHARD, RUPERT My reasoning for the above breakdown can be found in the link Munson mentioned above and the Sleek thread over on Sucks. The most legit criticisms against this breakdown was that it was too structured and lacked the random element that Burnett likes to employ for twists to ensure he doesn't get called for fixing the game. It also split up the lovebirds. With the understanding that sleek28's intel more or less mandates that the names in CAPS above be together on separate tribes (Raistlin's suggestion would have Colby as the odd man out and likely to get tossed before Jerri due to tribe dynamics), Bluto Delta suggested the following makeup which I really like. TRIBE A - Alicia, Colby, Jerri, LEX, SHII ANN, SUSAN, TOM TRIBE B - Amber, ETHAN, Jenna L., KATHY, RICHARD, Rob M., RUPERT Swapping Jenna L. and Rob M. for Alicia and Colby allows for the following. 1) Jerri's boot has been described as 'obvious'. What better way for a boot to be obvious than for her to be separated from the rest of Saboga? It ensures her boot is cinched without requiring the immediate reformation of the Lex-Tom bond as per my original scenario. Colby even gets to boot Jerri again. That's good TV. 2) The switch breakdown is more random and less structured. It's not surprising that Ethan would get taken out in that scenario as it would not be hard to sell Jenna on voting against him and Rob M. gets to relish in the fact that Ethan's getting sold up the river by his ex-GFs (Amber & Jenna). 3) The lovebirds get to remain together through the entire game. This may well be our swap tribe configuration. == Brad Lascelle <blascelle@gto.net>
|
|
Top |
| |
|
Raistlin212 17 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Got Milk? Spokesperson"
|
02-07-04, 09:48 AM (EST)
|
119. "RE: Sleek28's "boot list"" |
Speculation:TRIBE A - Alicia, Colby, Jerri, LEX, SHII ANN, SUSAN, TOMTRIBE B - Amber, ETHAN, Jenna L., KATHY, RICHARD, Rob M., RUPERT sleek:Jenna Lewis turns her back on her "new" alliance that includes Lex, Cathy, Shi-ann and Rupert This doesn't hold up. The only way for there to be two tribes of 7, and still have sleek be perfect is to use the following clues: Sue thinks she is in a position of power, she is not however Lex and Shi Ann lead to her dismissal Rich and Kathy have a huge blowup...with Rupert calling Rich a pathetic shell Combined with sleek's other quote above, Rich, Kathy, Rupert, Shii Ann, Lex, JennaL, and Sue all MUST be on the same team.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
Brad Lascelle 26 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Beauty Pageant Celebrity Judge"
|
02-07-04, 11:21 AM (EST)
|
121. "RE: Sleek28's "boot list"" |
> Speculation:TRIBE A - Alicia, Colby, Jerri, LEX, SHII ANN, > SUSAN, TOM > > TRIBE B - Amber, ETHAN, Jenna L., KATHY, RICHARD, Rob M., > RUPERT > > sleek:Jenna Lewis turns her back on her "new" alliance > that includes Lex, Cathy, Shi-ann and Rupert > > This doesn't hold up. The only way for there to be two > tribes of 7, and still have sleek be perfect is to use the > following clues:You're incorrectly using Colby's boot criteria when deducing the tribal shuffle makeup. According to sleek, Colby's getting tossed in the traditional merger episode with 10 people remaining in the game. The reason why Jenna's "new" alliance is in quotes is that everyone's alliance loyalties are reset at the merge for the end game. At merge, we'll have 4 Chapera, 4 Mogo Mogo and 2 Saboga... Kathy reunites with the rest of Mogo Mogo and probably attempts to bring both Rupert and Jenna with her into that alliance to help them pick off the 4 remaining Chapera (starting with Alicia or the Robfather). Jenna's not too crazy about this new pact (as per sleek's description) and jumps ship to assist in Colby's boot. == Brad Lascelle <blascelle@gto.net>
|
|
Top |
| |
|
dabo 26942 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
02-07-04, 09:31 PM (EST)
|
123. "RE: Sleek28's "boot list"" |
fake merge like in Thailand followed by actual merge later on?
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
|
Raistlin212 17 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Got Milk? Spokesperson"
|
02-06-04, 10:25 PM (EST)
|
111. "RE: Sleek28's "boot list"" |
LAST EDITED ON 02-06-04 AT 10:27 PM (EST)When you mention the Mogo Mogo tribe I don't immediately think it is obvious that Colby is the weak link and the obvious next boot. Richard isn't even making himself apart of the tribe, he has even admitted as much. The insider transcript posted indicates that Rich is at least sociable with the others. He'll hang around the fire and play in the games. Colby seems to be a little more distant. People are saying that he's not focused on this one, he's not really giving it his all. I haven't seen that yet, but if that's the case...Rich is definately trying to win. All he needs is two people to side with him. I think he can get Shii Ann and Lex or Kathy. He has to look at that as a good 4 person group to take into the merge...they really are kinda sheep for him to herd. If I'm Rich I'm worried about Colby and try to take him out. I think he can do it. Then with the Chapera tribe you say that Rob C. is another easy choice. Alicia is already on Rob M. and Tom's nerves and has been the one that instigated the the little spats we have been shown. Susan has also been somewhat of a loner and the loners usually are not in it for the long haul. There's a good discussion of this in the "Dynamics after Ep2" thread (in addition to the Patagonia Spoiler), but there's several reasons who RobC is an obvious choice. Mostly because he's more of a threat than Alicia, even if she's obnoxious. If RobM/Amber/Tom take out RobC then they own the tribe and can kick anyone else at any time. I bet if they head to TC, RobC will get worried and try to get Alicia and Sue on his side...then one will turn on him and join RobM/Amber/Tom.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
|
fredscott 16 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Got Milk? Spokesperson"
|
02-08-04, 01:53 AM (EST)
|
124. "RE: Sleek28's "boot list"" |
Judging by this article,(http://jam.canoe.ca/Television/feb7_survivor-sun.html) quite a few people are taking this spoiler seriously, even people who usually don't pay attention to spoilers.
|
|
Top |
| |
munson 1314 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Beef Jerky Spokesperson"
|
02-09-04, 11:49 PM (EST)
|
128. "Update" |
OK, for all of you who have been following the Sleek28 saga over at Sucks, it's taken another turn. Sleek returned and started a new thread this evening after finding his original thread removed from the Spoliers forum and dumped in The Dump.Nothing spoilerish of note really but more of a goodbye and farewell post (again), taking a final shot of the rude and nasty posters who compromise, in Sleek's estimation, about 10% of the Sucks community. Obviously this statement did not go over well with some of the regulars. Oh, yeah. Sleek continued to make his "last" post before returning minutes later to continue debating, defending, etc.. Pretty hilarious. They just ate him up. Problem is, he's right. Anyway... After finishing page 8 of a twelve page (and growing by the minute) thread, it was deleted. Yep. Not locked but deleted. Whatever your thoughts about the Sucks board in general or the mods, Q specifically, there is something mighty fishy about their reaction to Sleeks original post. Whatever. Makes the whole thing more enjoyable for me to read with all the background drama anyway. Deena Bennett (triadog), DarkRivers and Snewser himself had cameos in the thread. Deena and Wezzie got into a bit of a pissing match as well. Our new friend Brad Lascelle got in a few hilarious comments and a shout out from the Sleeker himself for his analysis of the information Sleek provided, even if he's not completely buying it. Not sure what I missed on the four pages that were deleted but probably nothing of substance. But why does everybody try to take the entertainment out of spoiling? It's a TV show, people. Sheesh, lighten the hell up. Sleek did say we would understand more about him and his motives following some type of announcement in 3 weeks and if true, methinks this Sleek business is far from done. For what it's worth, I saved Sleeks original post from the thread he started tonite. sleek28 Registered User Posts: 23 (2/9/04 6:20 pm) Reply Final message to the board and readers -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I know i am breaking a rule by starting a new thread, and i expect it to get locked- this morning i tried to find the original thread and it looked to me like it was not even in the dump anymore- and that is fine with me- i just wanted to use this opportunity to let you know how i feel about this. I came here originally for all of the right reasons, to simply giver info that most of you wanted or else you would not be here. You debated my information, and i have had no problem with that. I have said several times that the only thing that bothers me are the mean and insulting comments that have come from many of you. The problem is that up until now, i have not spent a ton of time on the internet, whether it be on boards or in any type of chat. So being new to the internet experience, i would treat the people the same way i would treat them face to face. What i see is many posters who want to be vulgar and HIDE behind their computers. That is their right to do so, but i also have a right to ask to be treated with a little respect. Final thoughts on this subject- Be decent to people- and stop trying to make it sound that i am so "angry" over whether someone believes my story or not, because that is not true Back to some of the people on the board and what i have seen as hypocrites. I originally posted this, and had all intention of NOT posting again. What i did not realize are the reasons why this little community is considered the gem of survivor spoiling, along with Survivor News. Because of these reasons and because of the challenges, any legitimate person or anyone that follows human nature, would defend themselves or want to interact with posters. I think about 90% of you, regular or not, are probably enjoyable people in real life. 10% of you have posted messages to my inbox, telling me how fun this has been and wanting more info from me, then turn around and bash me on this board. That is what i find the most disturbing- One of thos was the marquesan godfather- if you read what he wrote to you all as a community, he completely backpeddles when he finds out i sent HIS stalking type messages to me, to Griffe. That is one example of the two faced attitude that i am talking about- One of the "long time posters" had the nerve to tell me i should not assault MG's character, when all i did was PROVE him to be lying to all of you One thing that cracks me up that i forgot to post originally is how the great chillone (who i dearly like) and others who have been wrong through 2 picks, are still alive and kicking, where my accurate thread is now gone. I think many here have hindsight disease- the ability to look back and make a puzzle out of my info- no one had predicted the first 2 boots well before hand like myself, and yet my thread gets the boot-just like in life, bullshit spreads its love to all- I will encourage Burnett's boys to make up a name like "greenena" or "blackeena", or redeena, make up things as they go along and act like it is inside scoop I can tell you that something huge was coming in a few weeks, and i have not been banned by then, i will be more than happy to share that info, if it is not readily available in the media- I have lots to say about why i came here vs. going to the enquirerer, or what my true intentions are, etc. , what Mark Burnett is doing to counter future spoilers, etc,but i guess it does not matter now- If Q wants to ban the Sleek28 name then i have no problem with that. I am not out for glory, just out to be treated with some respect. If Q chooses to ban me then i will just email the big news to Griffe in about 3 weeks from now Sorry again to have started a new thread, i just did not know where else to post this For the 90% of you that have been civil have a great life Sleek28
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
|
munson 1314 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Beef Jerky Spokesperson"
|
02-10-04, 09:26 AM (EST)
|
136. "RE: Update" |
Q takes enough shots from Sucks members and whatever I personally think of SurvivorSucks as a spoiling site, he's got a tough job on his hands moderating within that community. But why anyone with legit info would post there is beyond me. That said, here's a thread that was locked, unlocked, dumped, moved again, etc.. I imagine Q, or someone, investigated the info Sleek provided about himself and was satisfied enough the leave the thread open at the same time dismissing the validity of the information. Griffe seemed to feel it was best for Sleek to just walk away less he risk the further ire of SEG. Valid info or not, it seems someone is satisfied that the guy is who he says he is. It's just the motives that are unclear. Just curious is all. Lock it or dump it, just be decisive. No doubt some fear of legal recourse is driving some of the decision making. I just find the whole thing fascinating. Now back to real life...
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
TeamJoisey 3558 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Thong Contest Judge"
|
02-10-04, 00:36 AM (EST)
|
131. "RE: Update" |
I dearly wish sleek would come over here instead. There are reasonable people here who would give his info the proper scrutiny. Of course, there are those of us who would be (have been) less than receptive to this "spoiler" (yeah, the clown); but overall, this is a more civil forum. And I for one would be happy to secretly establish Sleek's credentials. He went to the wrong board. Curse on Sucks. These reality show contestants need a reality check!
|
|
Top |
| |
|
dabo 26942 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
02-10-04, 09:20 AM (EST)
|
135. "RE: Update" |
He ought to come over here. Despite my skepticism, I would prefer to see intellectual dissection of the material rather than some of what is allowed at Sucks. As long as he doesn't come here with Bingo cards, if ya know what Ah mean.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Brad Lascelle 26 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Beauty Pageant Celebrity Judge"
|
02-12-04, 11:16 PM (EST)
|
149. "RE: Update" |
For what it's worth, a new plant/spoiler/intel resource surfaced over the last couple days in the wake of sleek28's departure and provided point-by-point details on comments various Mogo Mogo tribemates made after Rich brought the shark back to camp. These were bang on quote attributions to Colby and Shii Ann that simply could not be disputed.The guy's name is silverstarz and he promises to deliver more goods in due time. But, of course, once again only to the rabid Sucksters. Maybe some of you can persuade him to come here if he's plans on offering something more than pre-episode quotes. Ten bucks says he's a plant but I'll take constructive dialogue with a plant versus incessant badgering of a plant any day. BTW, I'm with Shakes. Tonight's episode was one of my faves of all-time. Wouldn't say it's my favorite as it didn't actually affect the game in any grand fashion but for pure storytelling, tribal interaction and seeing Survivors with REFRESHING editing spins, it was an absolute treat. == Brad Lascelle <blascelle@gto.net>
|
|
Top |
| |
munson 1314 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Beef Jerky Spokesperson"
|
02-12-04, 04:46 PM (EST)
|
144. "The latest and the last?" |
For what it's worth <sigh>Griffe Brian Posts: 2053 (2/12/04 3:10 pm) Reply ezSupporter Re: 3 weeks up? -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Message from Sleek saying that he has been told from above to cease and desist from any further messages on the board. I'm just passing the message along and don't know any more than that Cease and desist? From who above? How convenient after showing up in The Dump and promising the posters there that he would return to answer all of their questions. But just in case , sleek calls for a symbolic TC for Jenna and some reference to Jenna6 and Colby as the primary targets in Mogo2 in E3.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
Blow by Blow 895 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Fitness Correspondent"
|
02-12-04, 04:57 PM (EST)
|
145. "Lame..." |
Disappearing just before boots are a little less obvious... -BbB I do more to not work than actual work.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Get Bent 293 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Network TV Show Guest Star"
|
02-13-04, 02:51 AM (EST)
|
154. "RE: Sleek Poll" |
Forest Gump Forest,I wish you'd give us a little more. Why are you so sure this person is full of it? Is there some detail he gave that is so wrong? I agree, it is easy to be sued and probably not worth the trouble. Even if you won, your legal fees would be so high, so why post a list of boots? So what is your take on Snewser? SNN (Survior News Network). They spoil the show very accurately without spilling lists ahead of time. Insider information? Lucky guess? If Sleek is silly to post here, why do you? Just curious, not trying to be a smart ass. Can you tell us any other information or details that would be of interest to the spoiling community regarding Sleek or ASS in general? It seems you are a night owl like myself. I wish I had better questions! My brain is fried however!
|
|
Top |
| |
|
pmspml5 3263 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Car Show Celebrity"
|
02-13-04, 07:52 AM (EST)
|
155. "RE: Sleek Poll" |
Considering that there is absolutely NO tribal counsel and there wasnt anything close to it - I'd say that's proof enough for me that he is full of it.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
Brownroach 15341 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
02-13-04, 10:27 AM (EST)
|
156. "Episode 3 Post-Mortem" |
Rudy thinks he is Ok but easily is the second boot- Rupert justifies the boot afterward (as usual)If Rupert did, we didn't see it. Jenna leaves game, and i guess that is already known- Originally they were not going to make this a huge part of the episode, BUT the overwhelming feelings of the whole cast were evident- Yes, the feelings of the cast were evident, but how could they NOT make this a big part of the episode? Just to make you Jenna fans feel better- She and Colby were going to be targeted anyway- if they had lost i think Jenna would have been the first boot anyway. We saw no evidence of either of them being targeted. Jenna said on the Early Show that, had she stayed, she would have aligned with Kathy, Shii Ann, and probably Lex since she was close to them and things were sort of heading in that direction (I'm paraphrasing, but that was the gist of it.) Sleek28's info isn't holding up well in the details.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
okaloosajohn 1259 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Beef Jerky Spokesperson"
|
02-13-04, 11:59 AM (EST)
|
162. "RE: Episode 3 Post-Mortem" |
How can we possibly know anything about what is really going on in the game when all we get to see is what MB lets us see? And what little we can glean from the bootees?I mean the entire sequence at the Saboga beach in the early part of last night's show was edited to lead us to believe that they carried on a full morning of fishing and cooking and whatever before they got the "Trading Spaces" kit and challenge from tree mail, when actually that footage was shot the day after Rupert's ill thought out "log cabin" was already completed. For all we know, there was plenty of plotting going on at Mogo Mogo against Colby and/or JennaM and we didn't get shown one second of it. Why would he show it to us? That would not have fit in very well with the tearful departure at all, would it? Going back to first epsisode, who would have guessed, from the editing, that Tina made a long and impassioned plea at TC to Rupert to vote with her and not with JennaL and Jerri? I think that would be an excellent question to ask Kathy at next week's party. Was there any talk about booting Jenna as a prior winner? Or Colby as a runner up? And I'd also like to know whether or not her 'cancer' comment was edited into the show out of sequence or if she was just really being that insensitive. Sleek's story is presumably based upon footage that he/she saw. Considering how much footage must be shot each day, and considering the fact that we get to see only a very, very small percentage of it, and considering that every second that we get to see is exactly what MB allows us to see...well, Sleek's boot selections are still 100%. I'm not gonna throw that list away, or make any decisions about its accuracy until I see much more conclusive evidence than what I've seen so far.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
forestforest 28 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Beauty Pageant Celebrity Judge"
|
02-13-04, 11:38 AM (EST)
|
160. "RE: Sleek Poll" |
Hmmm. Lemme see if I can give satisfactory answers to your questions, GetBent.First, I'm not positive that Sleek is wrong in his list of boots. What I am positive about is that no one with the kind of insider edge that he's claiming would do what he's doing. It's just not logical behavior, at least not from anyone I know working at the level of trust that SURVIVOR demands. If you get hired by SURVIVOR, you'd better believe that MB has had you thoroughly vetted. MB might miss something -- are you really Clyde Barrow's love child? -- but he wouldn't miss the kind of madness that must be evident in anyone who's working the show and then, under cover of anonymity, is sneaking over here to tattle. It doesn't make sense for anyone intent on spoiling SURVIVOR bigtime to do it here. The contract -- I've heard -- is perfectly straightforward. YOU DON'T TELL. PERIOD. There are, as proof of my thinking, very very few leaks. If someone did leak the boot order, I'd have my money on one of the contestants having done so in a rather innocent setting. The contestants are not pros. Do you have any idea how COMMON it is for many people in television production to keep secrets, guarding them jealously? I doubt that, with all the talent available, MB, of all paranoid people, hired a mutt as Stupid as Sleek. His behavior is what I'd expect from a slow teenager, not someone who can get hired in a position of trust. All that saying goodbye and then coming back for encores. SNN -- my experience of SNN is that he checks and rechecks everything he "publishes." As I think I mentioned, I've tipped SNN to a couple of things and I know he's checked and checked to see if he can second-source my info. And he knows exactly who I am. So, I know from the other side just how carefully he works. In this mess of informants, SNEWSER is the one I'd trust. Plus, SNN has awesome contacts in the islands and on the mainland of Panama, and he stays in touch with them. Good man, the SNEWSER. A REAL spoiler would be someone more like me: calm, sane, credible, and probably wise enough to work through a "beard" rather than expose myself as Sleek is doing. What I'd do is tip SNEWSER and let him get the info out. That's what I've done in the past. I'm not sure how to use the quoting thingie on this program, but I hope I've answered all your questions. By the way, when the current Pope was elected, I was one of the first people in the world to know the name of the man. Did I tell anyone? Some things you don't leak. I see no evidence of any of the sort of discretion Sleek would need to be part of the world he's claiming to know. FF
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
|
|
munson 1314 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Beef Jerky Spokesperson"
|
02-13-04, 11:05 AM (EST)
|
157. "Crawling out of the woodwork" |
In the neverending saga that is Sleek28, another newbie arrives on the Sucks scene to add fuel to the fire. Here's the background. Early Wednesday morning, a poster named silverstarz starts a thread on Sucks with this post: silverstarz Osten Posts: 3 (2/11/04 2:50 am) Reply New spoilers for this thursdays episode...... -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I was told this from a very valid source that on this weeks episode Richard who was bitten by the shark on the arm will get alot of awe from fellow contestants. We will see colby start in on some dialog with richard to the degree of "Is it possible for a gay man to be called a stud?" Shii Ann gives credit to Richard for being a fishing god before his unfortunate arm bite. I have been in the industry and know that these facts are completely valid. I will have more information about when Jerry and rupert get in there fight today. I will keep you posted. thanks Edited by: silverstarz at: 2/11/04 12:35 pm Pretty spot on, huh? Of course, the Sucks poster jumped on this guy, questioning his "industry" status, etc.. His response: silverstarz Osten Posts: 4 (2/11/04 1:19 pm) Reply more spoilers..... -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Although I am a newbie here it doesn't mean that I can't have valid information. If the majority of people come on this forum to spoil events that take place in the show and people find pleasure in it then only time will tell about my facts. This is not some challenge or competition of who is right or wrong. I have been in the industry for quite some time and have a my own reasons for posting on this forum. My sources confirm that sleeks information is correct as well. I don’t like the fact that sleek only gives mild details and facts that are left incomplete. I will be filling in the gaps as the week progresses. As for the fight between Rupert and Jerry, what people don’t know yet is that Ethan is going to get very excited because it gives him hope for his own survival in the game. until next time.... So now silverstarz is confirming Sleek's list based on his industry connections and promises more episode detail. Last night, after the show aired, he posts: silverstarz Osten Posts: 5 (2/12/04 8:07 pm) Reply more info for tonight.... -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Some of you are noticing that the info I have given to this point is 100% true. I do know what I'm talking about and don't want to play games. You just need to take the time to collect all the info I give to see the big picture. I know things...and soon you will too. Edited by: silverstarz at: 2/12/04 8:20 pm What to make of all this? Well, it's likely silverstarz, or someone he knows, saw the final edit of E3. No way he has dialog detail like that otherwise. I'm not sure how the press preview copies of the show work - or even if there is such a thing - but that could explain why the episode information was confined to E3. But even if there are copies of the show floating around, MB has never included the IC and TC results. But why try to validate Sleek's list? If you have information about upcoming episodes a few days ahead of time, even if it doesn't include boot information, why not just post that and accept the kudos from the jaded and cynical Sucks posters? Why go all cryptic with "I know things" and "see the big picture?"
|
|
Top |
| |
|
Krautboy 2750 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Howard Stern Show Guest"
|
02-13-04, 11:29 AM (EST)
|
158. "New Silverstarz thread please?" |
Munson, interesting information. As you say, it's difficult to dispute the fact that he has access to detailed information...Since you've been following silverstarz so closely, would you mind starting a seperate thread for his posts so this thread doesn't get too long. Thanks... Krautboy
|
|
Top |
| |
Brownroach 15341 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
02-13-04, 01:24 PM (EST)
|
165. "No more posts in this thread, please" |
...as it's gotten extremely long.If -- BIG "IF" -- you want to dissect this matter any further, please do so in munson's Silverstarz thread here: http://community.realitytvworld.com/boards/DCForumID2/4814.shtml I am reposting the basic "spoiler" and a link back here in that thread. Thanks! --BR
|
|
Top |
| |
|
dabo 26942 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
02-17-04, 09:16 AM (EST)
|
168. "RE: Sleek28's "boot list"" |
It is curious. However, sometimes early boots get little attention until the episode in which they are booted (Kel is Oz is the classic example). The comment by Alicia about RobC getting by with the least possible effort may have been foreshadowing.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
erickman 61 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Hollywood Squares Square"
|
02-18-04, 10:14 AM (EST)
|
169. "RE: Sleek28's "boot list"" |
well Q found out this is a hoax and he won't let us talk about it anymore.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
VerucaSalt 1580 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Peanut Festival Grand Marshall"
|
02-18-04, 10:41 AM (EST)
|
171. "RE: Sleek28's "boot list"" |
Just to make it officialPosted by Q at SS Sleek has admitted to me that the boot order is false. He wanted to announce this himself, but I don't make a habit of letting hoaxers get their way. He made up a brand new story which is comical, it's about plants and conspiracies and MB actually giving a damn about spoiling, but it's a laughably transparent attempt to wriggle out of the nosedive the bootlist will eventually take, and it did not stand up to the slightest bit of scrutiny when I ran it by some contacts (it's a spoiler COMMUNITY, dipshit). This topic is important to some of you so I apologize for ending it abruptly, but hoaxes do not get attention here. Do not start new discussions on this topic. Sleek wants attention, and probably has a few accomplices, so the new rule is Any poster posting or paraphrasing a message from sleek will be immediately banned, no warnings, no questions. To the posters of this thread: go to the MESS Hall and study vidcaps. That's called SPOILING. To sleek: you failed. Well-crafted. Poorly executed.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
|
pmspml5 3263 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Car Show Celebrity"
|
02-18-04, 11:48 AM (EST)
|
176. "RE: Sleek28's "boot list"" |
I also think that Susan as outspoken as she is - has contributed more in the challenges and is stronger.
|
|
Top |
| |
I_Got_Nutn 897 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Fitness Correspondent"
|
02-18-04, 03:06 PM (EST)
|
177. "Looks like Sleek's run is over." |
Q Administrator Posts: 1348 (2/18/04 12:52 am)The sleek shall inherit the earth Sleek has admitted to me that the boot order is false. He wanted to announce this himself, but I don't make a habit of letting hoaxers get their way. He made up a brand new story which is comical, it's about plants and conspiracies and MB actually giving a damn about spoiling, but it's a laughably transparent attempt to wriggle out of the nosedive the bootlist will eventually take, and it did not stand up to the slightest bit of scrutiny when I ran it by some contacts (it's a spoiler COMMUNITY, dipshit). This topic is important to some of you so I apologize for ending it abruptly, but hoaxes do not get attention here. Do not start new discussions on this topic. Sleek wants attention, and probably has a few accomplices, so the new rule is Any poster posting or paraphrasing a message from sleek will be immediately banned, no warnings, no questions. To the posters of this thread: go to the MESS Hall and study vidcaps. That's called SPOILING. To sleek: you failed. Well-crafted. Poorly executed. Link Here Yeah, It's a JSlice Majority Whip
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
|
dabo 26942 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
02-18-04, 11:47 PM (EST)
|
179. "Lock, Please." |
The Q in all their omniscience have spoken.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
westgirl98 92 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Hollywood Squares Square"
|
02-19-04, 03:02 PM (EST)
|
180. "RE: Lock, Please." |
please do, enough already maybe hes right but I sure hope not I dont like Rob M or Amber!!
|
|
Top |
| |
|
shakes the clown 3366 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Car Show Celebrity"
|
02-19-04, 03:16 PM (EST)
|
181. "As usual, I was right" |
...does this mean I can officially start calling out the various idiots on this board that bought into this OBVIOUS load of crap?For those of you scoring at home, that makes the alltime score as follows... Shakes: 1,275 Ignorant Newbies: 0
|
|
Top |
| |
|
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
|
|