|
|
PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate
attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't
be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats,
but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other
posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out
how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are
encouraged to read the
complete guidelines.
As entertainment critic Roger
Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue
with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
|
|
"Christina's photos"
texaslawman 5 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "American Cancer Society Spokesperson"
|
11-11-05, 07:55 PM (EST)
|
"Christina's photos" |
I am a law student at the University of Texas and I have been given a mock trial assignment regarding the fate of Christina’s upcoming lawsuit with the various webmasters that hold her pictures as consensual property. It is going to be very difficult for Ken Townson to proceed with legal action with any of the webmasters since Christina signed release forms and the pictures actually belong to the company of the web host. He is using scare tactics to try and settle out of court. My solution is there is a loophole in contracts dealing in signing under emotional distress. So my project requires me to contact the webmasters as their advocates but my searching for the websites Christiana has done work for have turned out very few leads and there are millions of these sites out there. If anyone knows of any of the sites she has signed waivers for it would be very helpful.
|
|
Top |
| |
nancydeeann44 7 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "American Cancer Society Spokesperson"
|
11-11-05, 08:55 PM (EST)
|
1. "RE: Christina's photos" |
why would you want that information unless you just want to see the pictures wierd! You know she is getting all the legal help she needs from the show. She a con artist anyway so who cares!
|
|
Top |
| |
|
texaslawman 5 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "American Cancer Society Spokesperson"
|
11-12-05, 01:47 AM (EST)
|
5. "RE: Christina's photos" |
My Team is defending the right of the websites to continue to post photos they purchased under contract. I must combat the argument of duress as a defense so I have to dig deep into the loopholes favoring the defense. Remember to everyone responding to my post – I have no opinion nor interest in the show. This is a class room project one of many I’ve argued in the past three years.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
texaslawman 5 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "American Cancer Society Spokesperson"
|
11-12-05, 01:54 AM (EST)
|
6. "RE: Christina's photos" |
This is a class project - my wife will be playing the role of Ken Townson, Christina's attorney. There is no bearing on the real litigation process. And my wife gives me all the pictures I need, but thanks for asking P.S. she told me to put that in.
|
|
Top |
| |
Snowflake1988 28 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Beauty Pageant Celebrity Judge"
|
11-11-05, 10:52 PM (EST)
|
3. "RE: Christina's photos" |
I may have misunderstood your post, but I don't see how you can become involved in her case without her consent. I realize that it is a mock trial, but the people involved are real human beings. They are not hypothetical. The information related to her case is confidential even though she is still appearing on websites. She is supplying the necessary information to her attorney. I am sure SO can offer her the best assistance available to solve the issue.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
texaslawman 5 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "American Cancer Society Spokesperson"
|
11-12-05, 02:00 AM (EST)
|
7. "RE: Christina's photos" |
We are given a choice of all the currently publicized cases. I decided on this one because my mother-in-law watches the show. Better than Andrea Yates!!!!
|
|
Top |
| |
|
texaslawman 5 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "American Cancer Society Spokesperson"
|
11-12-05, 02:27 AM (EST)
|
8. "RE: Christina's photos" |
By the why y'all - I'm not looking for photo's - I'm looking for waives (contracts) - I searched back through the threads and could not find the websites mentioned - could someone repost them please?
|
|
Top |
| |
|
AshLanie 895 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Fitness Correspondent"
|
11-13-05, 08:10 AM (EST)
|
14. "RE: Christina's photos" |
And she used them for geting *Exposure*. I don't feel she is as uninformed as many think she is. She is a calcualting person (she has proven that ardy with her hustling within the house) who is using the show for *exposure*
She has seen what being on a reality show can do for contestant....the female from survivor who posed for Playboy, or one of those magazines. She knew exactly what she was doing by applying......she wanted a broader audience...... She made herself a public figure by being on the show.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
|
AshLanie 895 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Fitness Correspondent"
|
11-13-05, 09:06 AM (EST)
|
15. "RE: Christina's photos" |
>Through some research I was able >to track down the website >of the attorney that worked >on Christina's case. I sent >him an email about the >result of his efforts and >much to my surprise he >actually responded to my message. > > >In essence, he said that Christina >was initially on several websites, >many of which are not >listed in these message boards. >Because he is still in >the process of removing some >of her pictures and because >of attorney-client confidentiality, he would >not reveal the names of >the sites. But he said >both he and Christina were >pleased with his results--apparently, 70% >of her content was successfully >removed from the web. He >said that this matter is >not as black and white >as some of you may >think and that contrary to >what the future Mrs. Guccione >may think, there are nuances >to model releases that can >make them subject to litigation. > > >How cool! Anyway, he said he's >going to be on again >and maybe his next appearance >will shed some light on >this. Hmmmmmm...he is still working with her? Wonder who is paying him? The show began taping back in June, which means this probally happened in July, meaning the attorney being on the show.
I don't imagine Christine is still in the house five months later.
I question his ethics in typing any kind of reply back to you. I work for a law firm and only reply you would have received back, if there was a reply, would have been no comment.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
frogfan72 95 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Hollywood Squares Square"
|
11-12-05, 09:56 PM (EST)
|
13. "RE: Christina's photos" |
Lawyers being liars? :-O who woulda thunk it? ;D frogfan72
|
|
Top |
| |
|
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
|
|