|
|
PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate
attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't
be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats,
but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other
posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out
how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are
encouraged to read the
complete guidelines.
As entertainment critic Roger
Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue
with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
|
|
"Tax and tax and tax and tax. (no spend)"
Estee 57126 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
11-07-08, 02:45 PM (EST)
|
"Tax and tax and tax and tax. (no spend)" |
Michael Bloomberg, the erstwhile (yeah, right) mayor of New York City, a man who once tried to put a toll in the middle of Manhattan because who needs to drive anywhere in under three hours, the politician in your kitchen, someone who managed to rewrite the city laws just so he'd have another four years of killing everyone with less money than him, has just come up with another brilliant idea for emptying out the pockets of city residents. He wants to charge a five-cent tax on plastic bags.No, not for buying them. For being given them. Every time you get a plastic bag at the supermarket? Five cents. Double-bagging a heavy item? Make that ten cents. Need to carry a newspaper home in the rain? One nickel, please. And to give the stores an incentive to do it, they will generously be allowed to charge an extra penny and keep it for themselves, making the tax effectively six cents a bag. (This penny is expected to be taxed as bonus revenue.) It's supposed to cut down on recycling by forcing people to buy cloth bags. Want to know about the tax on cloth bags? GOP OTers, if you do nothing else, please keep this one out of high office...
|
|
Top |
| |
|
cahaya 19891 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
11-07-08, 02:56 PM (EST)
|
4. "RE: Tax and tax and tax and tax. (no spend)" |
Wow, think of the fortune the dumpster divers could make out of this!
|
|
Top |
| |
|
Estee 57126 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
11-07-08, 02:58 PM (EST)
|
5. "RE: Tax and tax and tax and tax. (no spend)" |
Of course there's a tax on the cloth bags: sales tax. Plus since they're made of cloth, they might be eligible for a clothing tax. You could wear one, right? You might have to after you're done paying your other taxes. Oh, and then there's the Privilege Of Paying Mayor Bloomberg Tax Tax, can't forget that one...
|
|
Top |
| |
|
Estee 57126 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
11-07-08, 05:17 PM (EST)
|
10. "RE: Tax and tax and tax and tax. (no spend)" |
NJ has no sales tax on clothing. NY varies by the region: sometimes clothes under $100 have no tax, sometimes they do, sometimes everything has tax, and sometimes the mayor drops by to mug you in person. He's thoughtful that way.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
jbug 17146 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
11-07-08, 09:00 PM (EST)
|
13. "RE: Serious Question" |
Memphis has the same kind of mayor. Residents are brain washed or something. The media refers to him as King Willie.
|
|
Top |
| |
mysticwolf 10692 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
11-07-08, 06:55 PM (EST)
|
11. "RE: Tax and tax and tax and tax. (no spend)" |
The worst part is that as more stores start charging for them your .06 is turning into .11 (most stores that have started charging price them at .05). Possibly more, if you're also being charged tax on the original nickle charge from the store.Seriously, this is something that more and more places are turning to. IKEA now charges .05 for each plastic bag. The UK and Ireland have both started requiring charges for them, and I don't think they're alone. There's a similar bill pending in California, and, again, I'm not sure that they're alone. Around here I don't know of any stores that charge outright for them, although some have indicated that they might. We do have stores that are giving you a .10 discount on your purchase if you bring your own bag, and is it's their bag. I've got probably 15-20 of the things, both with logos from the different area stores, and generic. We got pretty good at remembering to use them. If I forget to take one in with me, unless I need wastebasket liners or have a cart full, I reject one and carry the stuff to my car without. I had one clerk question me, in all seriousness, about whether I could carry the stuff without one. I pointed out that I'd managed to carry it all to the checkout. "Oh. Uh, I Guess you have a point."
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
cahaya 19891 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
11-07-08, 10:43 PM (EST)
|
15. "Waste and waste and waste and waste. (no keeping)" |
LAST EDITED ON 11-07-08 AT 10:45 PM (EST)One thing that struck me upon returning to the U.S. is the amount of waste Americans produce without even thinking about it. So much packaging, so little content relative to all the effort and cost put into the wrapping. One way to prevent excessive waste is to make people pay for it. In the good old days, it seems, we Americans were a frugal lot, doing simple things like saving aluminum foil for reuse. Now? it all goes in the trash can. Having said that, we still pay for all that plastic (or paper) we constantly bring home. Maybe not directly, but surely indirectly in the cost of the goods we put in them. What has been the result of a 'plastic bag tax' imposed elsewhere? Far less use (and waste) of plastic bags, more so with a higher tax as in some European countries. The purpose of this tax is not so much to raise revenue (as it will decline rapidly, more so with a higher 'tax'), as to change behavior. That's right - change behavior. And is changing behavior towards less waste a good idea? Your call, but there is a reasonable argument in favor of it. What does my local community do? Every week, trash is collected. For every trash bag, you have to place a $2 sticker on it to pay for waste collection and disposal. Every other week, recyclables are collected - including paper, plastic, aluminum, steel/tin, and other raw materials (in a list provided in noticed and on the web) collected and placed outside for collection. On these weeks, waste collection is free of charge. The result? One single bag of trash per week, and the equivalent of one container of recyclables per week. I've seen this same practice while I worked in the Netherlands and Belgium. Maybe Bloomberg is a greedy tax collector. On the other hand, the concept of encouraging people to think twice about thoughtlessly collecting, wasting and tossing into our environment non-biodegradable packaging isn't such a bad idea. If people won't change behavior out of good will, they will certainly reconsider changing behavior out of increased cost, especially during these economic times.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
CTgirl 8013 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
11-08-08, 12:21 PM (EST)
|
17. "RE: Waste and waste and waste and waste. (no keeping)" |
Cahaya, I agree with you 100%.The waste we create with packaging drives me nuts. I really do try to "reduce, reuse, recycle," but a lot of the packaging can't be reused or recycled and must be thrown out. It is such a waste of our resources. I love that you have to pay per bag of trash. It really makes you think twice before using something and then throwing it out. I'm all for a tax on bags to get people to reduce their use of them. I did a little search to get some background information on the pros and cons of plastic bags, and I found this debate on paper versus plastic of interest: http://www.reason.org/commentaries/smithheisters_20080417.shtml But bottom line, we just need to reduce waste in general.
Another Tribe Creation
|
|
Top |
| |
|
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
|
|