|
|
PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate
attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't
be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats,
but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other
posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out
how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are
encouraged to read the
complete guidelines.
As entertainment critic Roger
Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue
with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
|
|
"Sean on Early Show/Potential Kathy spoiler"
cowboyroo 590 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Reality Show Commentator"
|
05-17-02, 10:13 AM (EST)
|
"Sean on Early Show/Potential Kathy spoiler" |
I didn't see the whole show but one thing popped up in a major way. When asked about Kathy, Sean stated very confidently that he thought Kathy would have fared better if she aligned herself with him and Vee. I know he could have been talking about the past, and in that moment, but he seemed so confident about it, I personally take it that she doesn't go all the way. I would also speculate that she would win a jury vote against any of the 3 so I'd put her to come in 3rd or 4th...He also spoke nicely about Neleh but somewhat cringed when they were discussing her. Said she is a real sweet person out of game, but was fierce competition there. His facial expressions said a lot more than his words. He spoke well of Pappy as well, and not much on Vee.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
Loree 8616 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
05-17-02, 12:53 PM (EST)
|
4. "RE: Sean on Early Show/Potential Kathy spoiler" |
I thought it was interesting how he said it was up to him to expose that Neleh wasn't the sweet girl next door. I got the impression that he assumed he had done that and she doesn't win. He seemed rather pleased with himself. But then we all read his body language different. I didn't think anything he said meant Kathy doesn't win.
|
|
Top |
| |
katem 3315 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Car Show Celebrity"
|
05-17-02, 01:40 PM (EST)
|
5. "RE: Sean on Early Show/Potential Kathy spoiler" |
There absolutely NO spoilers here. When Sean spoke of Kathy, he did it answering Jane Clayson's questions about his rant in last night's TC.He said basically that he thought he had stated his enough, so that Kathy would know that she had a better chance with him and Vee. Which is something most people have been saying here. But, I did not perceive that, either from his tone of voice or body language, he was intuiting that Kathy did not win. He was very charismatic, funny and fun. I think it was probably one of the most entertaining Survivor-Early Show interview in quite some time, maybe since John was there. In conclusion, I got no spoilers from his interview.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
dangerkitty 1913 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Herbal Healing Drugs Endorser"
|
05-17-02, 03:16 PM (EST)
|
6. "RE: Sean on Early Show/Potential Kathy spoiler" |
I agree, I didn't take what he said about Kathy, or how he said it, as any big deal (and I realize that it can be seen differently, that's just how I reacted to it).The only possible spoiler, to me, was about Neleh. It seems crystal clear to me that Sean would NEVER vote for Neleh to win - he basically said, "I wasn't going to let her take that girl-next-door act all the way to a million dollars" - so I assume that if Neleh is F2, she doesn't get Sean's vote. Now, that may be obvious anyway, of course - what is relevant to me is, would he have said so much if in fact Neleh IS in Final 2? Now there is where I saw the confidence - and if she were F2, he wouldn't know for sure that she hadn't won; nor, quite likely, would he have been quite as free with talking about that so specifically. One COULD surmise that Neleh is not F2 from this.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
|
|