|
|
PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate
attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't
be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats,
but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other
posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out
how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are
encouraged to read the
complete guidelines.
As entertainment critic Roger
Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue
with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
|
|
"Munson's Law"
Krautboy 2750 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Howard Stern Show Guest"
|
03-18-02, 05:12 PM (EST)
|
"Munson's Law" |
Earlier this season Munson made some very interesting observations. He did an analysis of the previous editions of Survivor and found several patterns that have repeated themselves in all of them. I like to refer to them as “Munson’s Laws”. The original thread discussing them can be found here: http://community.realitytvworld.com/boards/DCForumID2/2170.shtmlMunson observed that the Final 3 have always been from the same original tribe. The nature of the game is such that alliances formed early tend to last and betrayals are quickly retaliated against. The Rotu have had time to bond and establish strong lasting alliances, while the Maraamu are a fragmented tribe. Rotu has won the first six challenges and the tribe members have been able to bond without the distraction of preparing for tribal councils. No one has had to choose sides or make any commitments about voting strategy. While the “End of Innocence” is coming, the Rotu have not had to face it yet, and as a result, are the more unified tribe. Significant weight loss reports for several Rotu members also seem to suggest a greater likelihood of Rotu success. The Rotu have dominated the challenges and the Maraamu have responded by voting off two of their strongest male members. If the game is allowed to continue without a swap/twist, it is very likely the Rotu will go into the merge united and with a numerical advantage. In that case a “Pagonging” is inevitable. An early merge would have the same result. Unfortunately, if some kind of a swap or reshuffeling takes place in EP4 the whole “Pagoning” process is just accelerated. Right now if the Rotu go to TC they have to vote off one of their own, but any swap or reshuffle just provides the dominant Rotu with the sacrificial lambs in the event the new tribe goes to TC. A reshuffle would also encourage the Rotu to consider throwing challenges in order to vote off the Maraamu members of the reorganized tribe. In any case, it seems inevitable that the Rotu will dominate, and the Final 3 will all be from the original tribe…it’s “Munson’s Law”. Krautboy
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
|
Krautboy 2750 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Howard Stern Show Guest"
|
03-18-02, 06:04 PM (EST)
|
4. "TV Guide: EP5" |
It's from the TV Guide...Survivor: Marquesas The End of Innocence 60 min. A fifth person is voted off the island. Jeff Probst is the host. Visit our Survivor: Marquesas show page Category: Reality TV Release Year: 2002 I've been thinking this refers to Rotu finally going to Tribal Council, but I'm still undecided if it refers to TC4 or TC5? Does the "End of Innocence" refer to the aftermath of TC4 during EP5 or the actual TC at the end of EP5? Does the "innocence" refer to Neleh trying to save Paschal, or is she the one voted out? Krautboy
|
|
Top |
| |
|
lazydazes 28 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Beauty Pageant Celebrity Judge"
|
03-18-02, 07:30 PM (EST)
|
7. "RE: TV Guide: EP5" |
I think the Ep. 5 title "End of Innocence" could refer to several things:1) the end of a simple "camping vacation" for the Maaramu (ie, the laziness around the camp) b/c in Ep. 5 the tribes merge (possibly) and they are forced to keep up and work around the camp to prove they deserve to stay and not get voted off 2) it could refer to the "twist" episode - maybe it is really going to occur in Ep. 5 (the title of 4 is trying to mislead us into thinking the merge happens this week instead of next). The twist may include a tribe swap of some kind forcing Rob and Sarah to split ways - ending their relationship 3) maybe the end of innocence is referring to Rob and Sarah b/c they finally realized that for one of them to win one will have to vote against the other in TC???? 4) maybe Rotu continues to lose IC (continuing as in - yes! I think they may possibly lose the IC this week) and it is the end of innocence for their tribe since they have not been to TC and had to vote one of their own off 5) maybe Rotu the "love tribe" is starting to not be so full of love anymore. Up until now, they have been winning - everything is easy and it is all fun and games until the losing starts. Maybe fingers start to point and alliances become more apparent OR they begin to form - therefore ending the innocence of a "everyone gets along" tribe Those are just some more possibilites in addition to Krautboy's Neleh and Paschal scenario.
|
|
Top |
| |
katem 3315 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Car Show Celebrity"
|
03-18-02, 05:45 PM (EST)
|
3. "RE: Munson's Law" |
LAST EDITED ON 03-18-02 AT 05:47 PM (EST)Kraut, I have not read a lot of postings from you lately, and to tell you the truth it has made kind of bitter. As GT says, there has not been much to go on lately and I have started to pull my hair out. You usually bring logic, lots of it, to your arguments and I usually lean on them to make my predictions. Now, having read this post, what you say does seem fair and logical, a Rotu will win the game, but (sorry to go a tad off topic) who do you think is going THIS week? From all the info (caps, weather reports, etc.) we have on the table, I am leaning towards assuming that Rotu will be weak this next ep and will lose the IC , giving Gina a break from certain elimination, with a possible Kathy boot. What do YOU think?
|
|
Top |
| |
TheWanderer 267 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Network TV Show Guest Star"
|
03-18-02, 06:20 PM (EST)
|
6. "RE: Munson's Law" |
As always, very well done Krautboy.Consider the following: 1) There is some evidence that a storm may hit. This may or may not have an affect on an early merge as I have been promoting. 2) We've been told by castaways and MB that they were informed from the start that a switch was possible (i.e., that it could happen, not that it would happen). If it does happen, the tribe members would be asked to send representatives. That would give them a clue (at least it would give Rotu a clue... Gina would probably recognize it, I'm not sure about the other Maraamu). 3)As a tribe, Rotu would be faced with a challenge similar to that at TC: who do you "vote off" Why? well, if a switch is invoked, JP/MB will probably have a 2 for three switch. Two Maraamu go to Rotu, 3 Rotu go to Maraamu. Rotu has 7 to Maraamu's 6. Which members are more likely to go the the new tribes? - Maraamu: Gina and Vee would go. As mentioned in other threads, we know Gina would want out. Rob and Sarah wouldn't wnat to be split. Sean and Vee are probably ambivalent, but Sean would want to stay with Rob. - Rotu: This is tough. Since the new Maraamu would consist of 3 from each tribe, a chance is being taken for votes along tribal lines in TC. I'd like some suggesstions here. I can see Rotu throwing a challenge to "pagong" old Maraamu, however, that may not occur in this instance, depending upon who goes over. If Gina & Vee are sent, I can see Vee getting the boot and Gina making new friends.
|
|
Top |
| |
PepeLePew13 26134 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
03-19-02, 12:15 PM (EST)
|
10. "RE: Munson's Law" |
Your explanations and analysis is very sound, Krautboy, and the theory does seem to fit this year as well with Rot-u taking such a stranglehold of the game at this point in time.I would submit, though, that it is still very possible (though unlikely with the way the editing has gone thus far) that it could be a final 3 of Maamuus. How? Let's say a 3 Rotu for 2 Maamuu switch happens this week. In Maamuu you've got 3 former Rotus and 3 current Maamuus with the Robfather controlling his group. They lose the IC and win a TC tiebreaker and boot a former Rotu. Rob's gang wins the next 2 ICs after that and boot the remaining former Rotus. If the traditional merge happens here, then you've got 5 from each original tribe and all the old Maamuus need to do is to win the tiebreaker and they're in control from there on. Of course, we might not get a switch or early merge at all and the Rotus go to TC the next 3 times to lose their advantage. An early merge would most certainly doom Maamuu but another scenario that isn't likely to happen but would benefit Maamuu is to for them to lose this week's IC, be down to 4 and then have Rotus split into half, creating 3 tribes of 4 -- in which case, the Maamuus just keep winning all ICs from there on. Having said all that, I'm not holding my breath expecting Rotu to fall apart and let Maamuu gain control of the game. I think Gabe, Paschal and Tammy, amongst others, are too smart to let their people get too out of control. The logic thus far says that it'll be a Rotu final three.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
|
|