|
|
PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate
attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't
be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats,
but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other
posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out
how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are
encouraged to read the
complete guidelines.
As entertainment critic Roger
Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue
with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
|
|
"Survivor 2 nastier?"
The Fool 5 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "American Cancer Society Spokesperson"
|
08-25-00, 03:42 PM (EST)
|
"Survivor 2 nastier?" |
Just read an article ( http://www.themestream.com/gspd_browse/browse/view_article.gsp?c_id=152995 ) that brought up some good points. Now that everyone knows the way to win, won't Survivor 2 be nastier?I think the show won't be as fun to watch if everyone is mean and paranoid all the time. Then again, it would definitely make it INTERESTING. I don't know. Just a thought. The fool
|
|
Top |
| |
BlueDude 17 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Got Milk? Spokesperson"
|
08-25-00, 04:00 PM (EST)
|
1. "RE: Survivor 2 nastier?" |
At first I thought a nastier, more cutthroat Survivor would be a drag or depressing. But after reminiscing about all those airheaded Pagongers and their "I'm too good for an alliance" crap while they watched each other be picked off one by one, I'm all for a show Machiavelli would be proud of. This will be Lord of the Flies without the threat of death and it will be fascinating....a real live anthro experiment!
|
|
Top |
| |
|
zerokewl999999 70 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Hollywood Squares Square"
|
08-27-00, 01:00 PM (EST)
|
5. "RE: Survivor 2 nastier?" |
There's no doubt that there will be people who will want to form alliances, but I think maybe the one's who don't want to will see it coming and vote off the alliance heads(the Rich types). It would be much more fun to watch a non alliance bound version of Survivor where anyoone can go.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
SuperPole2000 120 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Blistex Spokesperson"
|
08-27-00, 05:44 AM (EST)
|
4. "RE: Survivor 2 nastier?" |
I agree. I expect the most interesting battle of wits will take place between MB and the inquiring public (us), and he's already proven himself a worthy opponent. I think the funnest part of the whole show is trying to figure out ahead of time who will win. With the zillions of dollars he stands to make, we can expect him to pull out all the stops in guarding his secret.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
|
|