|
|
PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate
attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't
be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats,
but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other
posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out
how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are
encouraged to read the
complete guidelines.
As entertainment critic Roger
Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue
with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
|
|
"Thoughts on "The Reebok Theory" and other speculations"
Cherberrie 1285 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Beef Jerky Spokesperson"
|
08-27-00, 08:01 AM (EST)
|
"Thoughts on "The Reebok Theory" and other speculations" |
Now that the final episode has aired, it is very amusing to look back on all our speculations! So much for my Rudy theory! And, to think, for me, the final clincher that it was Rudy was a photo of the final four which depicted, what looked like just Rudy wearing a Reebok shirt. There has been other speculation now that Kelly also was wearing a Reebok shirt in that photo but the logo was obscured due to the angle the photo was taken at. Anyhow, to think that the true winner was blatantly broadcasted right under our noses during all the episodes now makes sense(i.e., all the air time given to Rich)! Ummmm, I wonder if the CBS editors will do the same thing in Survivor 2 (i.e., extra airtime to winner)? Probably not. P.S. RC- I received your email that you sent me on 8/23, Subject: The Reebok theory. When I tried to reply to it, I received an error message that there was "no such user." Anyhow, this post is my reply to your email. Alas, I hope you are still around and that we will see you in January for Survivor 2! -CB
|
|
Top |
| |
SuperPole2000 120 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Blistex Spokesperson"
|
08-27-00, 08:15 AM (EST)
|
1. "RE: Thoughts on "The Reebok Theory" and other speculations" |
Heee..don't feel bad. My Sean theory kind of bit the dust too.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
|
|