LAST EDITED ON 04-13-02 AT 03:37 PM (EST)LAST EDITED ON 04-13-02 AT 03:33 PM (EST)
LAST EDITED ON 04-13-02 AT 03:30 PM (EST)
In EP7 Jeff Prost says, "You can give up your immunity and give it somebody else." Well that's just plain stupid, and I can't see anybody who wins immunity doing something as lame and stupid as that. Especially if your giving up your immunity right out in the open.
This new "rule" could have been great for the show if more twist and turns were put on it..... I mean if Mark Burnette was trying to change things up a bit, he failed to change anything.
I just can't help my thoughts on this, so here are a few things that come to my mind on how the new rule SHOULD have been.
Now if Jeff would have said at TC "Here is the new rule change on immunity:
1) You can give up your immunity to somebody who needs it, but your decision is not revealed until after the votes are cast.
2) The person with immunity must write their decision on the voting ballet of who their voting against, and if you've given immunity to somebody.
3) This also means the survivors can still vote against you, but if you decided to keep your immunity, the votes against you don't count.
4) Voting will only be once per tribal council, and in the event of a tie, a question and answer will be the tiebreaker.
These rules would have made the show sooooooo much more fun and interesting. I get really bored with the same old alliance thing. Big Yawn. It just makes it to easy for these people.
So with that, the scenario would be something like this as it would have pertained to EP7.....
Kathy voted against Zoe, and she gave immunity to Rob. I know I'll probably get bashed for saying this. But I can't help it; I'm a true believer in routing for the underdog.
So with the votes falling where they were, we have 2 votes John, and 1 Zoe. That means John is voted out. I would have loved to see this happen.
Of course, this immunity rule leaves many scenarios open for debate. But it also provides much more suspense, chance, and luck for the survivors. It will also make winning immunity much more important and critical. Maybe if John had known about the rule change, he wouldn't have thrown his immunity out when he supposedly was reaching for his shirt.
I sure hope MB is going to pull out another twist this season, because now were left with a boring survivor for another 7 weeks.
Maybe Gina's radio show spoiler will be true. I can't remember which post she said it in, but she was asked on the radio if there is going to be a 14 person jury, and she said "if you are referring to the traditional survivor, then no there won't be." or something like that.
I sure hope so, because then everybody will have a say on who should win. As for K/N/P and even Sean, I'm routing for you guys. Long live the underdogs.
Email this topic to a friend
Printer-friendly version of this topic
Bookmark this topic (Registered users only)
