Rob can win if he can convince the jury.
Here's his speech:We've all played this game before, we've all watched each other play on TV. We're all students of the game, we know how this game is played. It is a game of deception, a game of alliances, and a game of broken alliances.
Survivor demands that you to work with people, bond with people, laugh sweat sleep and starve with people that you eventually intend to betray. It is a tough place to make friends, and as we now know, it is not a game you should play with friends.
In the past 39 days I have lied, I have decieved, I have betrayed. Regrettably, I have hurt people who were my friends. But please remember this: It was all done in the context of the game. There is a million dollars at stake, and I played this game as hard as anyone ever has.
Through it all, I have played most of this game with a target on my back. There were a lot of conversations, I'm sure, about booting me. I'm still here.
I won a lot of immunity challenges that kept me here. Winning challenges can save you once, but it always increases the size of the target. I'm still here.
My alliance with Amber was out in the open. I didn't play this game under the radar, and I didn't lay back and wait for the power players to knock each other off. I was out in the open the whole way. I'm still here.
Why is that?
Outwit. Outplay. Outlast.
I can see that some of you may not like me right now. I'm sorry if our friendships have been damaged. I hope that we can put this game, and it is a game, into the proper context.
I've played the game of Survivor, and I've played it well.
I've played it every moment I was here, and I've played it well enough to win.
You are the jury, and you have the decision in your hands. All I ask is that you put any hard feelings aside, and chose the winner who played the best game.
If Rawb actually says any of this, I want a cut.
Email this topic to a friend
Printer-friendly version of this topic
Bookmark this topic (Registered users only)
