|
|
PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate
attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't
be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats,
but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other
posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out
how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are
encouraged to read the
complete guidelines.
As entertainment critic Roger
Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue
with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
|
|
"Naughty Ingrid"
ladro 1168 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Politically Incorrect Guest"
|
03-14-05, 10:00 PM (EST)
|
1. "RE: Naughty Ingrid" |
It's OK, post the link. There are probably 100,000 women that look like Ingrid though.
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
 |
volntitan 4 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "American Cancer Society Spokesperson"
|
03-28-05, 01:05 AM (EST)
|
4. "RE: Naughty Ingrid" |
LOL...Like I said, a buddy of mine found it. I never asked him how because, well honestly, I just don't want to know. I didn't think it was because you know someone would have picked up on it. They do look alot alike though.
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
 |
ladro 1168 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Politically Incorrect Guest"
|
03-28-05, 02:41 AM (EST)
|
6. "RE: Naughty Ingrid" |
The girl in the picture looks at least 5 years younger than Ingrid. So I guess it 'could' have been her from 5+ years ago. Me thinks that the owner of those photos would have promoted them during the show if it was indeed her. So, my bottomline is 20-1 against.
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
AyaK 10083 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
03-28-05, 02:06 PM (EST)
|
7. "Post 2 removed" |
I removed post 2 (containing the link) because the site that it linked to was XXX, without any real warning about how hard-core the site was.
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
|
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
|
|