"More reason to question Paul's motives" - Reality TV World Message Board Forums

Reality TV World Message Board Forums PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats, but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are encouraged to read the complete guidelines. As entertainment critic Roger Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."

"More reason to question Paul's motives"

Conferences Cupid Forum (Protected)
Email this topic to a friend Printer-friendly version of this topic Bookmark this topic (Registered users only)		Previous Topic \| Next Topic
Original message

HappyDayz 278 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Network TV Show Guest Star"	08-10-03, 02:03 PM (EST)
"More reason to question Paul's motives"
Paul lists in his bio, and he mentioned during his second date with Lisa, that he has a play opening soon. Here is a write-up I found from last November, http://www.httheater.org/season5/RockShow.html (don't know if it's the same play that is upcoming), listing his background....he was a member of the Blue Man Group, and has a lot of theatre credits (acting, writing, and directing). This guy is in it for publicity....I have little doubt.....why else would he be willing to be sequestered for all this time right before he has a play opening? To try and milk his publicity from Cupid for every last drop he can get from it. He's a player...I totally don't trust him! http://www.httheater.org/season5/RockShow.html
Alert	Edit \| Reply \| Reply With Quote \| Top

Table of Contents

Subject Author Message Date ID

RE: More reason to question Paul's ... Swami 08-11-03 1

RE: More reason to question Paul's ... Darylg 08-11-03 2

p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -

about this site • advertise on this site • contact us • privacy policy •