|
|
PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate
attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't
be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats,
but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other
posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out
how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are
encouraged to read the
complete guidelines.
As entertainment critic Roger
Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue
with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
|
|
"Charla horror"
fasin8n 2 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "American Cancer Society Spokesperson"
|
05-29-06, 10:06 AM (EST)
|
"Charla horror" |
Charla has NO CLASS, no wonder she was the only gurl not able to hook up and was turned down. To not share her undeserved winnings with the REASON she was kept on the whole time shows no character. 2 faced back stabber is all I can say, Disgusted just looking at that face. Kharma will be running rampant on this one. So happy that Dave wasn't infected, and he got over his crush quickly. She gives humanity a bad name. What a greedy pig.
|
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
paradisehotelfanatic 1 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "American Cancer Society Spokesperson"
|
05-29-06, 10:56 AM (EST)
|
1. "RE: Charla horror" |
i totally agree, i watched the show when it aired originally on fox about two years ago, and i watched it again when they did it on the fox reality tv channel. I knew charla was mean but i didn't realize how mean she really was until i watched it again the second time. after all the crap dave went throught to put her there. she was even the only ##### to not vote for dave when he was pleading to be admitted into the hotel, she told him that little detail on their last day in paradise, how sneaky!!! it was partly because of her that people didn't really like Dave. as far as i'm concerned, i LOVED everone else in that hotel, especially ZACK (oh, ZACK, LOL) BUT the one person i absolutely couldn't stand in real life would be charla. What a selfish brat!!!!!
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
 |
ChadB 31 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Beauty Pageant Celebrity Judge"
|
06-22-06, 11:56 PM (EST)
|
3. "RE: Charla horror" |
LAST EDITED ON 06-23-06 AT 00:01 AM (EST) Charla did not use Dave. You're seeing in the show what you WANT to see apparently. I saw the show too, and did not see what you guys see. Charla consistently from start to finish went out of her way to show and tell Dave that she was not interested in him in any other way than partner for the game. I mean is it possible to make it any more clear to somebody you AREN'T INTERESTED than to not only tell him you don't like him to touch you, but to tell him that in front of everybody? How could she POSSIBLY have made her feelings any clearer. She wouldn't sleep with him, she didn't even want him to touch her. Somebody illuminate for me how in the world her behavior could be taken as leading him on. Charla didn't owe Dave a dime. IF she owed anybody any money, it would be Keith. It was not Dave that got her to the end, it was Keith. Dave lost. It is spelled L O S T. Dave lost because he made a lot of enemies, so he ACTUALLY lost the game for Charla too, if you use a rational mind and THINK ABOUT THAT. There is a logical reason Keith shared his money with Tara. He and Tara were actually a couple (Dave and Charla were not). Keith and Tara moved in together after the show and remain close though they separated. I'll bet you that had Keith and Tara had NO intimate feelings towards one another whatsoever, he'd not have shared the money. There was really no logical reason to share the money with Dave. You will say "but Dave got her to the end". No he did not. He got her to ALMOST the end. I mean if you even believe that probably the most enemied guy on the show was an advantage to her. But the fact was he did NOT get her to the end, in the end there was 2 winners, not 4. Keith and Charla won, EVERYBODY else lost. As stated before there was a VERY LOGICAL reason Keith shared his half; NO such reason existed for Charla except in small and IMO irrational minds.
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
|
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
|
|