The Amazing Race   American Idol   The Apprentice   The Bachelor   The Bachelorette   Big Brother   The Biggest Loser
Dancing with the Stars   So You Think You Can Dance   Survivor   Top Model   The Voice   The X Factor       Reality TV World
   
Reality TV World Message Board Forums
PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats, but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are encouraged to read the complete guidelines. As entertainment critic Roger Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
"Episode 3: Going to the Dogs"
Email this topic to a friend
Printer-friendly version of this topic
Bookmark this topic (Registered users only)
 
Previous Topic | Next Topic 
Conferences Project Runway Forum (Protected)
Original message

tribephyl 9688 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"

07-27-06, 05:47 AM (EST)
Click to EMail tribephyl Click to send private message to tribephyl Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
"Episode 3: Going to the Dogs"
Designers attempt to make a woman and a dog look good together.
First, I loved the idea only because the objective of the challenge was to come up with a narrative for each woman and their dog. Making up a story/theme, matching the outfit, hair/makeup etc.
It was great to see Alison really take charge with this challenge, she deserved to win in my opinion because she really got into the details and also made an incredible outfit for both the model and the dog.

Uli ended up winning. Granted her dress was great! Her dog kinda matched but was a little uninspired for me. (I guess pandering to the lady judges works.)


I'm fairly shocked Angela made it through again. But at least she designed something this week. It looked awful together and din't have a clear narrative. Nor was her dog outfit anywhere near interesting. But she made it.
Katherine ended up being the designer to leave because she obviously spent more time on the dog outfit than on her dress.
That Silk Hoodie was adorable. Almost adorable enough to go out and buy a girl puppy dog just so I can purchase her that outfit. Alas, this isn't Project Westminster.


  Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

  Table of Contents

  Subject     Author     Message Date     ID  
 What's up for next week? JudyB 07-27-06 1
   RE: What's up for next week? ohmyheck 07-27-06 3
       RE: What's up for next week? JudyB 07-27-06 5
       RE: What's up for next week? Snidget 07-27-06 9
       RE: What's up for next week? Angelflutter 07-28-06 15
   RE: What's up for next week? drooler 07-27-06 13
   RE: What's up for next week? RonReports 07-29-06 24
 RE: Episode 3: Going to the Dogs NewFan 07-27-06 2
   RE: Episode 3: Going to the Dogs Angelflutter 07-28-06 16
       RE: Episode 3: Going to the Dogs tac_2 07-28-06 18
 RE: Episode 3: Going to the Dogs Snidget 07-27-06 4
   RE: Episode 3: Going to the Dogs CattyChat 07-27-06 10
 RE: Episode 3: Going to the Dogs frodis 07-27-06 6
   RE: Episode 3: Going to the Dogs Tahj 07-27-06 7
       RE: Episode 3: Going to the Dogs JudyB 07-27-06 8
           RE: Episode 3: Going to the Dogs ginger 07-27-06 11
               RE: Episode 3: Going to the Dogs frodis 07-27-06 12
                   RE: Episode 3: Going to the Dogs ginger 07-27-06 14
                       RE: Episode 3: Going to the Dogs tac_2 07-28-06 17
                           RE: Episode 3: Going to the Dogs tribephyl 07-29-06 20
       RE: Episode 3: Going to the Dogs linz79 07-29-06 25
   RE: Episode 3: Going to the Dogs tac_2 07-29-06 19
       RE: Episode 3: Going to the Dogs tribephyl 07-29-06 21
           RE: Episode 3: Going to the Dogs KLicK 07-29-06 22
               RE: Episode 3: Going to the Dogs tribephyl 07-29-06 23

Lobby | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

Messages in this topic

JudyB 35 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Beauty Pageant Celebrity Judge"

07-27-06, 08:01 AM (EST)
Click to EMail JudyB Click to send private message to JudyB Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
1. "What's up for next week?"
Anyone out there have any idea who will be thrown out next week? I can't wait.
  Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

ohmyheck 1919 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Herbal Healing Drugs Endorser"

07-27-06, 09:24 AM (EST)
Click to EMail ohmyheck Click to send private message to ohmyheck Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
3. "RE: What's up for next week?"
I think Keith because of the collar that he put on the dog.
  Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

JudyB 35 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Beauty Pageant Celebrity Judge"

07-27-06, 09:59 AM (EST)
Click to EMail JudyB Click to send private message to JudyB Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
5. "RE: What's up for next week?"
I think Keith as well but because he has such a bad attitude that I think he does something next week that will get him in trouble.
  Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Snidget 43862 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"

07-27-06, 11:40 AM (EST)
Click to EMail Snidget Click to send private message to Snidget Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
9. "RE: What's up for next week?"
Tim's blog says the bracelet was off the Macy's accessory wall and I think that is fair game for the designers for jewelry and stuff.

I'm not sure if this will be challenge oriented or not as to what rule was broken. May be a more general rule (like LCS with contact with outside people) or something like that rather than didn't do the challenge the way it was set up.


Lost with PhoenixMons

  Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Angelflutter 64 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Hollywood Squares Square"

07-28-06, 10:10 PM (EST)
Click to EMail Angelflutter Click to send private message to Angelflutter Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
15. "RE: What's up for next week?"
Yeah Keith. Isn't he just a royal #####? I sure would like to see him gone. Maybe he's the one getting kicked out for using the bracelet as his dogs " fashion statement"


.

  Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

drooler 67 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Hollywood Squares Square"

07-27-06, 01:19 PM (EST)
Click to EMail drooler Click to send private message to drooler Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
13. "RE: What's up for next week?"
LAST EDITED ON 07-27-06 AT 01:21 PM (EST)

I've heard Keith because several of his portfolio drawings were sketches of other designers work. Can't remember where I saw the site but the pix of models on the runway at other designers shows next to Keith's drawings were really damning.

Edit: Ooops, it's in the Season 3 Dirt and Spoilers by Bebekid.

  Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

RonReports 218 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Network TV Show Guest Star"

07-29-06, 07:23 PM (EST)
Click to EMail RonReports Click to send private message to RonReports Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
24. "RE: What's up for next week?"
>Anyone out there have any idea
>who will be thrown out
>next week?

Project Runway is unpredictable because some designers who should know better often make stupid mistakes that can result in their being cut. One example is designing a dress that did not have a finished hem, and this week's example was completing only part of the challenge and pretty much ignoring the requirement to design something for the dog.

  Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

NewFan 139 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Blistex Spokesperson"

07-27-06, 09:20 AM (EST)
Click to EMail NewFan Click to send private message to NewFan Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
2. "RE: Episode 3: Going to the Dogs"
I think if Catherine had heeded Tim's advice and made a matching shrug or hoodie for her model, she would have been safe. Angela's outfit was really atrocious, in my opinion. The top had those spread-out cups that totally flattened her model, and it looked to me like the waist on her skirt was rolling down. Obviously I'm not fashion-savvy, because Vera Wang thought it was great (ugh!)
  Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Angelflutter 64 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Hollywood Squares Square"

07-28-06, 10:14 PM (EST)
Click to EMail Angelflutter Click to send private message to Angelflutter Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
16. "RE: Episode 3: Going to the Dogs"
What does Vera Wang know" I have never liked anything that she has done. Some of her bridal gowns are extremey stupid looking. When you buy Vera - you are just buying the name. As for myself, I'd rather get married in a paper grocery bag as to one of her gowns. Just my extremely humble opinion.
  Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

tac_2 351 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Cooking Show Host"

07-28-06, 11:49 PM (EST)
Click to EMail tac_2 Click to send private message to tac_2 Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
18. "RE: Episode 3: Going to the Dogs"
LAST EDITED ON 07-29-06 AT 00:36 AM (EST)

>What does Vera Wang know"


Vera seemed very programmed to me, as if during one the huddle-ups the judges do she was told what to say. Michael Kors needs to get back and pronto.

eta: weird, but I don't see my original reply so I'll just say, I agree with you! And, basically, Vera isn't doing her career any favors by appearing on PR.


  Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Snidget 43862 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"

07-27-06, 09:34 AM (EST)
Click to EMail Snidget Click to send private message to Snidget Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
4. "RE: Episode 3: Going to the Dogs"
I wondered how many times over the seasons one of the models wished they could just roll around on the runway trying to get the outfit foisted upon them off like a couple of the dogs did.


It's a tribe creation!

  Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

CattyChat 3379 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Car Show Celebrity"

07-27-06, 11:57 AM (EST)
Click to EMail CattyChat Click to send private message to CattyChat Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
10. "RE: Episode 3: Going to the Dogs"
LOL!!! Makes you wonder. Also, I thought the dog rolling around was hilarious and cute.


Kind Creation of ARNutz

  Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

frodis 4442 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Jerry Springer Show Guest"

07-27-06, 10:10 AM (EST)
Click to EMail frodis Click to send private message to frodis Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
6. "RE: Episode 3: Going to the Dogs"
I was surprised that Angela wasn't booted. To me, her outfit looked like something pulled together from some old bags of clothes (and the bag itself.) Old bags of clothes from the 80s. Which the 80s rejected. It just needed legwarmers.

I get it, she likes those taffeta poofy skirts - so much that she wears them herself. I understand that there's a wide range of fashion tastes out there, but if I saw someone walking down the street in that get-up I'd wonder from what movie set she'd escaped. (Who's That Girl part II?)

When I saw Bradley's model come down the runway I was pretty sure he'd be safe. His blouse reminded me (slightly) of the top Daniel V. made last season in the photo inspiration challenge.

Oh Keith, you're so pompous. I'd like to hate you, but for some reason I don't. That dress? Lovely.

Vincent, what's with you and the hats?

Michael has been under the radar so far, but he has been turning out some really beautiful, elegant dresses. I've been surprised each week that his designs haven't been in the top, but as long as he stays safe I can look forward to what he'll come up with next.

What I said about Michael? Goes for Laura, too. Her designs are very tailored and look expensive, and it surprises me that she manages to come up with that look on a small budget. My worry for her is that so far, her style reminds me of the "matronly" section of the flagship department stores (and not necessarily young or modern.) Classic - yes. Beautiful - yes. Now, believe me, I know that not everything needs to be young and modern, but I guess I'd like to see Laura's range.

I thought Katharine's dress was very pretty, albeit simple. I agree, that had she made a hoodie for the model she would have been safe. I thought her dress was infinitely better than Angela's, but it seems that this season, if you're making big construction errors, you're toast.

  Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Tahj 4136 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Jerry Springer Show Guest"

07-27-06, 11:02 AM (EST)
Click to EMail Tahj Click to send private message to Tahj Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
7. "RE: Episode 3: Going to the Dogs"
I thought this week all the designers stepped up and had some good designs to offer. I was really impressed.

Michael has been under the radar so far, but he has been turning out some really beautiful, elegant dresses. I've been surprised each week that his designs haven't been in the top, but as long as he stays safe I can look forward to what he'll come up with next.

I wonder why the show has basically ignored him so far. His design last night was really outstanding, my favorite, and we just don't get to see it during the show at all. I wonder if he turns out to be a frontrunner so we'll see more of him later. Hope so.

I basically hated Bradley's design. I couldn't believe it when the judges loved it so much.


Tribe rocks my sig

  Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

JudyB 35 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Beauty Pageant Celebrity Judge"

07-27-06, 11:23 AM (EST)
Click to EMail JudyB Click to send private message to JudyB Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
8. "RE: Episode 3: Going to the Dogs"
I was so totally blown away that Bradley got such good reviews from the Judges. I almost fell off my couch. It just goes to show you how editing can make you think one thing and the outcome is totally different. I thought his outfit was not good at all.
  Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

ginger 22511 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"

07-27-06, 12:37 PM (EST)
Click to EMail ginger Click to send private message to ginger Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
11. "RE: Episode 3: Going to the Dogs"
They really love blousy simple stuff. Danny V. had some similar hits last year.

Angela is like gum stuck to the shoe of the season. I wish they'd scrape her off.



  Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

frodis 4442 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Jerry Springer Show Guest"

07-27-06, 01:18 PM (EST)
Click to EMail frodis Click to send private message to frodis Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
12. "RE: Episode 3: Going to the Dogs"
If Angela is gum, she's one of those obnoxiously fruity neon-colored gums, like Bubbalicious. Just as sticky, too, apparently.
  Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

ginger 22511 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"

07-27-06, 01:38 PM (EST)
Click to EMail ginger Click to send private message to ginger Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
14. "RE: Episode 3: Going to the Dogs"
Given this week's challenge, I guess I should have used a dog poop metaphor instead.


  Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

tac_2 351 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Cooking Show Host"

07-28-06, 11:43 PM (EST)
Click to EMail tac_2 Click to send private message to tac_2 Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
17. "RE: Episode 3: Going to the Dogs"
How come nobody designed a dog pooper scooper? Or maybe they did...I was so distracted by the runway spectacle I may not have noticed.

ya know...the dogs were cute and all but the concept was just too goofy. I'm with Keith on that. (But then I felt the same way about the Barbie assignment, too. Was stupid, imo.)

And the Trump daughter as a judge? What a joke! Exactly what qualifies her I'd like to know.

What's wrong with straight forward assignments with no gimmicks?
I sure hope the nonsense is about over and these designers are allowed to really get down to showing us what they got.

  Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

tribephyl 9688 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"

07-29-06, 05:02 AM (EST)
Click to EMail tribephyl Click to send private message to tribephyl Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
20. "RE: Episode 3: Going to the Dogs"
the dogs were cute and all but the concept was just too goofy. and I sure hope the nonsense is about over and these designers are allowed to really get down to showing us what they got.

I think that Keith along with quite a few of the others completely missed the point of this challenge.
Sure on the surface it's about making a dog sweater and a "matching" dress.
But the producers were on target with trying to get the contestants to focus on the entire package.
"Come up with a story about your woman. Why she has the dog? What is she doing? Where does she live? etc."
This was purely to encourage the designers to really think about having a statement, with their designs.

Besides, if Keith (or many of the others) ever is in the position to have his own runway show he's gonna have to think about all aspects of a show. Not just the dresses but the theme, the hair, the lighting, the music, the makeup and yes maybe even an accessory on a leash.

I said this above but I'll restate it here. Alison should have won this challenge.
Her whole package was thought out and well executed. Dog, dress, hair, makeup, theme, story, vision.

IMO, Uli's dress was cute but her whole package fell a bit short.
She makes up for it by already possesing a personal design vision.

They'll all find out soon enough when more and more of the "scatterbrained" non-consistent, "visionless" players start exposing themselves.
People with a clear vision of their design style will succeed in this game.
It's what the judges look for.
Including VeraWang. Who does indeed have a vision.
Not one I'm personally attacted to but it is done with a vision of her design style.



  Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

linz79 23 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Got Milk? Spokesperson"

07-29-06, 09:25 PM (EST)
Click to EMail linz79 Click to send private message to linz79 Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
25. "RE: Episode 3: Going to the Dogs"
i totally agree Tajh. everything tha Michael has put out on that runway has been sensational. He gets no respect. Whats up with that!!!!
  Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

tac_2 351 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Cooking Show Host"

07-29-06, 00:19 AM (EST)
Click to EMail tac_2 Click to send private message to tac_2 Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
19. "RE: Episode 3: Going to the Dogs"

>
>Oh Keith, you're so pompous.
>I'd like to hate you,
>but for some reason I
>don't. That dress?
>Lovely.
>
True. And I thought it was odd (even mean-spirited) they mentioned he would have won had he designed something for the dog. His dress was elegant and oh my, the colors, just beautiful.
Too bad we couldn't see the construction all that well, thanks to that foolish looking dog.

Angela should have gotten the boot. Why she didn't is a mystery and it totally escapes me how that mess o' material she put together is considered 'well constructed'. It was absolutely the worse design I've seen on PR.

Laura - she's starting to get boring and it's only what..three weeks now? That said, I'd probably trust her the most at this point to design something for me.

I forget now who did the chanel plaid skirt and top - loved that one.


  Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

tribephyl 9688 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"

07-29-06, 05:07 AM (EST)
Click to EMail tribephyl Click to send private message to tribephyl Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
21. "RE: Episode 3: Going to the Dogs"
I forget now who did the chanel plaid skirt and top - loved that one.

Kayne did it.
Remember him and Laura having that exchange about how they think each other has bad taste. Funny stuff.

It was a cute outfit. Very smart looking.


  Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

KLicK 316 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Cooking Show Host"

07-29-06, 07:17 AM (EST)
Click to EMail KLicK Click to send private message to KLicK Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
22. "RE: Episode 3: Going to the Dogs"
Wasn't it Robert?

Kayne did the print skirt that reminded me of Nick's Barbie dress from last season.

  Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

tribephyl 9688 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"

07-29-06, 03:21 PM (EST)
Click to EMail tribephyl Click to send private message to tribephyl Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
23. "RE: Episode 3: Going to the Dogs"
You're right. It was Robert.

Here's Kayne's dress...

You're right about the Nick-Barbie comparison. They do look very similar.

  Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top


Lock | Archive | Remove

Lobby | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
about this site   •   advertise on this site  •   contact us  •   privacy policy   •