"next week 2 versus 3?" - Reality TV World Message Board Forums

Reality TV World Message Board Forums PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats, but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are encouraged to read the complete guidelines. As entertainment critic Roger Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."

"next week 2 versus 3?"

Conferences The Apprentice Spoilers/Speculation Forum (Protected)
Email this topic to a friend Printer-friendly version of this topic Bookmark this topic (Registered users only)		Previous Topic \| Next Topic
Original message

gnosis92 78 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Hollywood Squares Square"	11-27-04, 11:19 PM (EST)
"next week 2 versus 3?"
doesn't seem all that fair! perhaps 1- kelly should sit out or 2- bring in a third person, like kwame or bill rancic 3- divide revenue per person
Alert	Edit \| Reply \| Reply With Quote \| Top

Table of Contents

  Subject     Author     Message Date     ID

RE: next week 2 versus 3? seahorse 11-28-04 1

   RE: next week 2 versus 3? Wolfcat 11-28-04 2

       RE: next week 2 versus 3? StarryLuna 11-28-04 3

           RE: next week 2 versus 3? gnosis92 11-28-04 4

               RE: next week 2 versus 3? ARnutz 11-28-04 5

RE: next week 2 versus 3? banzai 11-28-04 6

   RE: next week 2 versus 3? kidflash212 11-28-04 7

RE: next week 2 versus 3? okaychatt 11-28-04 8

Lobby | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

Messages in this topic

seahorse 14337 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
11-28-04, 01:59 AM (EST)

1. "RE: next week 2 versus 3?"

I don't remember what they did last year but 3 vs. 2 is a big advantage.

Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Wolfcat 84 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Hollywood Squares Square"
11-28-04, 09:35 AM (EST)

2. "RE: next week 2 versus 3?"

I think it was Troy and Kwame vs Bill, Nick and Amy.
Troy and Kwame were in the Boardroom.
I dont remember what the task was though

>I don't remember what they did
>last year but 3 vs.
>2 is a big advantage.
>
>
>

Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

StarryLuna 4771 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Stuff Magazine Centerfold"
11-28-04, 11:13 AM (EST)

3. "RE: next week 2 versus 3?"

No, last year was Bill, Kwame and Troy versus Nick and Amy. (Kwame and Troy had taken Bill from Nick, Amy, and Katrina the previous week during the Atlantic City task.) The task was to rent out one of Trump's sky high apartments for the highest amount. Troy went into slimy car salesman mode and tried dangling two people to get the higher price and almost wound up with nothing. In one of those strange "coincidences," Nick and Amy didn't have any bites until 10 minutes before the task ended. Nick and Amy ulitmately won and Bill, Kwame, and Troy headed to the boardroom where Kwame and Troy finally faced off and Troy was fired.

A JSlice of holiday spirit!

Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

gnosis92 78 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Hollywood Squares Square"
11-28-04, 11:56 AM (EST)

4. "RE: next week 2 versus 3?"

it seems like this task, like the ice cream task, is which team makes the most profit (or revenue) selling candy.
seems to me that having 3 people is a huge advantage over 2.
- that and ivanna willing to sell sex literally.
looks really bad for mosaic. (which is now all-women, ironic, isn't it?)

Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

ARnutz 13792 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
11-28-04, 12:18 PM (EST)

5. "RE: next week 2 versus 3?"

seems to me that having 3 people is a huge advantage over 2.
Not necessarily - I think it depends on their plans for the "sale"... of course, I hope you are correct.
looks really bad for mosaic. (which is now all-women, ironic, isn't it?)
... and next week, if Ivana is fired, (which I would do for taking down her skirt) we could potentially have the 2 men left on Apex

A J Slice original (c)2004

Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

banzai 556 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Reality Show Commentator"
11-28-04, 01:41 PM (EST)

6. "RE: next week 2 versus 3?"

It is an unfair task. Because for the next task, they have to make candies, pass the quality control department, and then wrap up the candy bars.
With 3 people especially 2 men, they can churn out more candies since they have more manpower.
For a fair task, M&M should give out 100 boxes free to each team. And then, whatever they make more on their own will be a good addition. And then, it's up to their marketing strategy.
How come they don't do wholesaling to the mom&pop stores?

Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

kidflash212 3854 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Thong Contest Judge"
11-28-04, 10:08 PM (EST)

7. "RE: next week 2 versus 3?"

Are you being funny? They have to make the candy and wrap it?!?!?!? That's insane. I was under the impression they would just be selling the candy.
It is an unfair task though - last years task at this point had very little advantage for the team with three people but this year they could split up in three and sell more. This task is kinda lame for this point in the show, isn't it? How creative can they get in selling candy? Retailers will not buy at such a high cost when they usually get a bulk discount so they will be left with selling individual bars. Are they going to to try the tired Charity scam again?

Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

okaychatt 2810 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Howard Stern Show Guest"
11-28-04, 11:34 PM (EST)

8. "RE: next week 2 versus 3?"

<doesn't seem all that fair!
You're right, but who ever claimed that a real business is concerned with making sure all companies start from the same point?
Given these peeps' record of infighting and disastrous ideas, it might be an advantage to their having only two on the team. Perhaps teamwork will thrive with only two on the task.
I'll enjoy watching them duke it out for Final Four this week.

Everyone is entitled to my opinion.

Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Lock | Archive | Remove

Lobby | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -

about this site • advertise on this site • contact us • privacy policy •